Choon Sik Chung, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Dong Keun Lee
{"title":"根据经肛门和经阴道直肠前突深度变化的长期临床结果比较","authors":"Choon Sik Chung, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Dong Keun Lee","doi":"10.3393/jksc.2012.28.3.140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was aimed to compare the results of a transanal repair with those of a transvaginal levatorplasty and to determine the long-term clinical outcomes according to the change in the depth of the rectocele after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 50 women who underwent a rectocele repair from March 2005 to February 2007, 26 women (group A) received a transanal repair, and 24 (group B) received a transvaginal repair with or without levatorplasty. At 12 months after the procedures, 45 (group A/B, 22/23 women) among the 50 women completed physiologic studies, including anal manometry and defecography, and clinical-outcome measurements. The variations of the clinical outcomes with changes in the depth of the rectocele were also evaluated in 42 women (group A/B, 20/22) at the median follow-up of 50 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the defecographic findings, the postoperative depth of the rectocele decreased significantly in both groups (group A vs. B, 1.91 ± 0.20 vs. 2.25 ± 0.46, P = 0.040). At 12 months after surgery, 17 women in each group (group A/B, 77/75%) reported improvement of their symptoms. However, only 11 and 13 women (group A/B, 55/59%) of groups A and B, respectively, maintained their improvement at the median follow-up of 50 months. Better results were reported in patients with a greater change in the depth of their rectocele (≥4 cm) after the procedure (P = 0.001)</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In both procedures, clinical outcomes might become progressively worse as the length of the follow-up is increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":17346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/6b/jksc-28-140.PMC3398109.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes according to the Change in the Rectocele Depth between Transanal and Transvaginal Repairs for a Symptomatic Rectocele.\",\"authors\":\"Choon Sik Chung, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Dong Keun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3393/jksc.2012.28.3.140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was aimed to compare the results of a transanal repair with those of a transvaginal levatorplasty and to determine the long-term clinical outcomes according to the change in the depth of the rectocele after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 50 women who underwent a rectocele repair from March 2005 to February 2007, 26 women (group A) received a transanal repair, and 24 (group B) received a transvaginal repair with or without levatorplasty. At 12 months after the procedures, 45 (group A/B, 22/23 women) among the 50 women completed physiologic studies, including anal manometry and defecography, and clinical-outcome measurements. The variations of the clinical outcomes with changes in the depth of the rectocele were also evaluated in 42 women (group A/B, 20/22) at the median follow-up of 50 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the defecographic findings, the postoperative depth of the rectocele decreased significantly in both groups (group A vs. B, 1.91 ± 0.20 vs. 2.25 ± 0.46, P = 0.040). At 12 months after surgery, 17 women in each group (group A/B, 77/75%) reported improvement of their symptoms. However, only 11 and 13 women (group A/B, 55/59%) of groups A and B, respectively, maintained their improvement at the median follow-up of 50 months. Better results were reported in patients with a greater change in the depth of their rectocele (≥4 cm) after the procedure (P = 0.001)</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In both procedures, clinical outcomes might become progressively worse as the length of the follow-up is increased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/6b/jksc-28-140.PMC3398109.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.3.140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.3.140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
目的:本研究旨在比较经肛门修复与经阴道提肛成形术的结果,并根据手术后直肠前突深度的变化确定长期临床结果。方法:在2005年3月至2007年2月间接受直肠前突修复术的50名妇女中,26名妇女(a组)接受经肛门修复术,24名妇女(B组)接受经阴道修复术,有或没有提肛成形术。在手术后12个月,50名女性中有45名(A/B组,22/23名女性)完成了生理研究,包括肛门压力测量和排便造影,以及临床结果测量。42名女性(A/B组,20/22组)在中位随访50个月时,临床结果随直肠前突深度变化的变化也进行了评估。结果:在排便造影上,两组患者术后直肠突深度均明显减小(A组vs B组,1.91±0.20 vs 2.25±0.46,P = 0.040)。术后12个月,每组17名妇女(A/B组,77/75%)报告症状改善。然而,在中位随访50个月时,A组和B组分别只有11名和13名妇女(A/B组,55/59%)保持改善。手术后直肠前突深度(≥4 cm)变化较大的患者疗效较好(P = 0.001)。结论:两种手术的临床结果都可能随着随访时间的延长而逐渐恶化。
Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes according to the Change in the Rectocele Depth between Transanal and Transvaginal Repairs for a Symptomatic Rectocele.
Purpose: This study was aimed to compare the results of a transanal repair with those of a transvaginal levatorplasty and to determine the long-term clinical outcomes according to the change in the depth of the rectocele after the procedure.
Methods: Of 50 women who underwent a rectocele repair from March 2005 to February 2007, 26 women (group A) received a transanal repair, and 24 (group B) received a transvaginal repair with or without levatorplasty. At 12 months after the procedures, 45 (group A/B, 22/23 women) among the 50 women completed physiologic studies, including anal manometry and defecography, and clinical-outcome measurements. The variations of the clinical outcomes with changes in the depth of the rectocele were also evaluated in 42 women (group A/B, 20/22) at the median follow-up of 50 months.
Results: On the defecographic findings, the postoperative depth of the rectocele decreased significantly in both groups (group A vs. B, 1.91 ± 0.20 vs. 2.25 ± 0.46, P = 0.040). At 12 months after surgery, 17 women in each group (group A/B, 77/75%) reported improvement of their symptoms. However, only 11 and 13 women (group A/B, 55/59%) of groups A and B, respectively, maintained their improvement at the median follow-up of 50 months. Better results were reported in patients with a greater change in the depth of their rectocele (≥4 cm) after the procedure (P = 0.001)
Conclusion: In both procedures, clinical outcomes might become progressively worse as the length of the follow-up is increased.