急诊医师对谷歌文档演示文稿的看法:一项调查协议。

Patrick M Archambault, Danielle Blouin, Julien Poitras, Renée-Marie Fountain, Richard Fleet, Andrea Bilodeau, France Légaré
{"title":"急诊医师对谷歌文档演示文稿的看法:一项调查协议。","authors":"Patrick M Archambault,&nbsp;Danielle Blouin,&nbsp;Julien Poitras,&nbsp;Renée-Marie Fountain,&nbsp;Richard Fleet,&nbsp;Andrea Bilodeau,&nbsp;France Légaré","doi":"10.14236/jhi.v19i4.815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Web 2.0 collaborative writing technologies have shown positive effects on medical education. One such technology, Google Docs(™), offers collaborative writing applications that improve healthcare students' sharing of information. Since 2008, all graduating residents in emergency medicine in Canada have had access to an online Google Docs(™) slideshow designed to help them share summaries of landmark articles in preparation for their Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification exam. A recent evaluation showed that contributions to the presentation were low.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study will identify the factors that influence residents' decision to contribute or not to contribute to this online collaborative project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour, semistructured interviews will be conducted with 25 graduating emergency medicine residents in Canada. Content from the interviews will be analysed to determine the most important beliefs in relation to the defined behaviour.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this study will be the first to use a theory based framework to identify healthcare trainees' salient beliefs concerning their decision whether to contribute to an online collaborative writing project using Google Docs(™).</p>","PeriodicalId":30591,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Primary Care","volume":"19 4","pages":"207-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency medicine residents' beliefs about contributing to a Google Docs presentation: a survey protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick M Archambault,&nbsp;Danielle Blouin,&nbsp;Julien Poitras,&nbsp;Renée-Marie Fountain,&nbsp;Richard Fleet,&nbsp;Andrea Bilodeau,&nbsp;France Légaré\",\"doi\":\"10.14236/jhi.v19i4.815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Web 2.0 collaborative writing technologies have shown positive effects on medical education. One such technology, Google Docs(™), offers collaborative writing applications that improve healthcare students' sharing of information. Since 2008, all graduating residents in emergency medicine in Canada have had access to an online Google Docs(™) slideshow designed to help them share summaries of landmark articles in preparation for their Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification exam. A recent evaluation showed that contributions to the presentation were low.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study will identify the factors that influence residents' decision to contribute or not to contribute to this online collaborative project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour, semistructured interviews will be conducted with 25 graduating emergency medicine residents in Canada. Content from the interviews will be analysed to determine the most important beliefs in relation to the defined behaviour.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this study will be the first to use a theory based framework to identify healthcare trainees' salient beliefs concerning their decision whether to contribute to an online collaborative writing project using Google Docs(™).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatics in Primary Care\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"207-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatics in Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v19i4.815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v19i4.815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:Web 2.0协同写作技术对医学教育产生了积极的影响。其中一项技术是Google Docs(™),它提供协作写作应用程序,可改善医疗保健专业学生的信息共享。自2008年以来,加拿大所有急诊医学专业的毕业生都可以访问在线Google Docs(™)幻灯片,该幻灯片旨在帮助他们分享具有里程碑意义的文章摘要,以准备加拿大皇家内科医生和外科医生学院的认证考试。最近的一项评估显示,对演示文稿的贡献很低。目的:本研究将找出影响居民参与或不参与此线上合作计画的因素。方法:运用计划行为理论,对加拿大25名即将毕业的急诊科住院医师进行半结构化访谈。将分析访谈内容,以确定与定义行为相关的最重要信念。结论:据我们所知,这项研究将是第一个使用基于理论的框架来确定医疗学员在决定是否使用谷歌文档(™)为在线协作写作项目做出贡献时的突出信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emergency medicine residents' beliefs about contributing to a Google Docs presentation: a survey protocol.

Background: Web 2.0 collaborative writing technologies have shown positive effects on medical education. One such technology, Google Docs(™), offers collaborative writing applications that improve healthcare students' sharing of information. Since 2008, all graduating residents in emergency medicine in Canada have had access to an online Google Docs(™) slideshow designed to help them share summaries of landmark articles in preparation for their Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification exam. A recent evaluation showed that contributions to the presentation were low.

Objective: This study will identify the factors that influence residents' decision to contribute or not to contribute to this online collaborative project.

Methods: Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour, semistructured interviews will be conducted with 25 graduating emergency medicine residents in Canada. Content from the interviews will be analysed to determine the most important beliefs in relation to the defined behaviour.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study will be the first to use a theory based framework to identify healthcare trainees' salient beliefs concerning their decision whether to contribute to an online collaborative writing project using Google Docs(™).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring an informed decision-making framework using in-home sensors: older adults' perceptions. Undertaking sociotechnical evaluations of health information technologies. Privacy protection for personal health information and shared care records. Coding errors in an analysis of the impact of pay-for-performance on the care for long-term cardiovascular disease: a case study. Effective pseudonymisation and explicit statements of public interest to ensure the benefits of sharing health data for research, quality improvement and health service management outweigh the risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1