Jane C. Tan MD, PhD , Jane P. Kim PhD , Glenn M. Chertow MD, MPH , F. Carl Grumet MD , Manisha Desai PhD
{"title":"肾移植中的供体-受体性别不匹配","authors":"Jane C. Tan MD, PhD , Jane P. Kim PhD , Glenn M. Chertow MD, MPH , F. Carl Grumet MD , Manisha Desai PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The lack of reliable human proxies for minor (ie, non-HLA) histocompatibility loci<span> hampers the ability to leverage these factors toward improving transplant outcomes. Despite conflicting reports of the effect of donor–recipient sex mismatch on renal allografts<span>, the association between acute rejection<span> of renal allografts and the development of human alloantibodies to the male H-Y antigen suggested to us that donor–recipient sex mismatch deserved re-evaluation.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether the relationships between donor sex and allograft failure differed by recipient sex.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We studied recipients of deceased-donor (n = 125,369) and living-donor (n = 63,139) transplants in the United States Renal Data System. Using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by donor type, we estimated the association between donor–recipient sex mismatch and death-censored allograft failure with adjustment for known risk factors, with and without the use of multiple imputation methods to account for potential bias and/or loss of efficiency due to missing data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The advantage afforded by male donor kidneys was more pronounced among male than among female recipients (8% vs 2% relative risk reduction; interaction </span><em>P</em> < 0.01). This difference is of the order of magnitude of several other risk factors affecting donor selection decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>Donor–recipient sex mismatch affects renal allograft survival in a direction consistent with immune responses to sexually determined </span>minor histocompatibility antigens. Our study provides a paradigm for clinical detection of markers for minor histocompatibility loci.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55124,"journal":{"name":"Gender Medicine","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 335-347.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.004","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donor–Recipient Sex Mismatch in Kidney Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Jane C. Tan MD, PhD , Jane P. Kim PhD , Glenn M. Chertow MD, MPH , F. Carl Grumet MD , Manisha Desai PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The lack of reliable human proxies for minor (ie, non-HLA) histocompatibility loci<span> hampers the ability to leverage these factors toward improving transplant outcomes. Despite conflicting reports of the effect of donor–recipient sex mismatch on renal allografts<span>, the association between acute rejection<span> of renal allografts and the development of human alloantibodies to the male H-Y antigen suggested to us that donor–recipient sex mismatch deserved re-evaluation.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether the relationships between donor sex and allograft failure differed by recipient sex.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We studied recipients of deceased-donor (n = 125,369) and living-donor (n = 63,139) transplants in the United States Renal Data System. Using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by donor type, we estimated the association between donor–recipient sex mismatch and death-censored allograft failure with adjustment for known risk factors, with and without the use of multiple imputation methods to account for potential bias and/or loss of efficiency due to missing data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The advantage afforded by male donor kidneys was more pronounced among male than among female recipients (8% vs 2% relative risk reduction; interaction </span><em>P</em> < 0.01). This difference is of the order of magnitude of several other risk factors affecting donor selection decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>Donor–recipient sex mismatch affects renal allograft survival in a direction consistent with immune responses to sexually determined </span>minor histocompatibility antigens. Our study provides a paradigm for clinical detection of markers for minor histocompatibility loci.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 335-347.e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.004\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550857912001350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550857912001350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38
摘要
缺乏可靠的人类替代次要(即非hla)组织相容性位点阻碍了利用这些因素改善移植结果的能力。尽管关于供体-受体性别错配对同种异体肾移植的影响的报道相互矛盾,但同种异体肾移植急性排斥反应与人类对男性H-Y抗原产生同种异体抗体之间的关系表明,供体-受体性别错配值得重新评估。目的探讨供体性别与同种异体移植失败的关系是否因受体性别而异。方法我们研究了美国肾脏数据系统中死亡供者(n = 125,369)和活体供者(n = 63,139)的移植受者。使用按供体类型分层的Cox比例风险模型,我们估计了供体-受体性别不匹配与死亡审查的同种异体移植物失败之间的关系,调整了已知的风险因素,并使用和不使用多种imputation方法来解释数据缺失导致的潜在偏差和/或效率损失。结果男性供肾的优势在男性中比在女性受体中更为明显(相对风险降低8% vs 2%;相互作用P <0.01)。这种差异是影响供体选择决定的其他几个风险因素的数量级。结论供体-受体性别错配影响同种异体肾移植存活的方向与对性别决定的次要组织相容性抗原的免疫应答一致。我们的研究为临床检测次要组织相容性位点的标记提供了一个范例。
Donor–Recipient Sex Mismatch in Kidney Transplantation
Background
The lack of reliable human proxies for minor (ie, non-HLA) histocompatibility loci hampers the ability to leverage these factors toward improving transplant outcomes. Despite conflicting reports of the effect of donor–recipient sex mismatch on renal allografts, the association between acute rejection of renal allografts and the development of human alloantibodies to the male H-Y antigen suggested to us that donor–recipient sex mismatch deserved re-evaluation.
Objective
To evaluate whether the relationships between donor sex and allograft failure differed by recipient sex.
Methods
We studied recipients of deceased-donor (n = 125,369) and living-donor (n = 63,139) transplants in the United States Renal Data System. Using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by donor type, we estimated the association between donor–recipient sex mismatch and death-censored allograft failure with adjustment for known risk factors, with and without the use of multiple imputation methods to account for potential bias and/or loss of efficiency due to missing data.
Results
The advantage afforded by male donor kidneys was more pronounced among male than among female recipients (8% vs 2% relative risk reduction; interaction P < 0.01). This difference is of the order of magnitude of several other risk factors affecting donor selection decisions.
Conclusions
Donor–recipient sex mismatch affects renal allograft survival in a direction consistent with immune responses to sexually determined minor histocompatibility antigens. Our study provides a paradigm for clinical detection of markers for minor histocompatibility loci.