肾移植中的供体-受体性别不匹配

Jane C. Tan MD, PhD , Jane P. Kim PhD , Glenn M. Chertow MD, MPH , F. Carl Grumet MD , Manisha Desai PhD
{"title":"肾移植中的供体-受体性别不匹配","authors":"Jane C. Tan MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jane P. Kim PhD ,&nbsp;Glenn M. Chertow MD, MPH ,&nbsp;F. Carl Grumet MD ,&nbsp;Manisha Desai PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The lack of reliable human proxies for minor (ie, non-HLA) histocompatibility loci<span> hampers the ability to leverage these factors toward improving transplant outcomes. Despite conflicting reports of the effect of donor–recipient sex mismatch on renal allografts<span>, the association between acute rejection<span> of renal allografts and the development of human alloantibodies to the male H-Y antigen suggested to us that donor–recipient sex mismatch deserved re-evaluation.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether the relationships between donor sex and allograft failure differed by recipient sex.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We studied recipients of deceased-donor (n = 125,369) and living-donor (n = 63,139) transplants in the United States Renal Data System. Using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by donor type, we estimated the association between donor–recipient sex mismatch and death-censored allograft failure with adjustment for known risk factors, with and without the use of multiple imputation methods to account for potential bias and/or loss of efficiency due to missing data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The advantage afforded by male donor kidneys was more pronounced among male than among female recipients (8% vs 2% relative risk reduction; interaction </span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). This difference is of the order of magnitude of several other risk factors affecting donor selection decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>Donor–recipient sex mismatch affects renal allograft survival in a direction consistent with immune responses to sexually determined </span>minor histocompatibility antigens. Our study provides a paradigm for clinical detection of markers for minor histocompatibility loci.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55124,"journal":{"name":"Gender Medicine","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 335-347.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.004","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donor–Recipient Sex Mismatch in Kidney Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Jane C. Tan MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jane P. Kim PhD ,&nbsp;Glenn M. Chertow MD, MPH ,&nbsp;F. Carl Grumet MD ,&nbsp;Manisha Desai PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The lack of reliable human proxies for minor (ie, non-HLA) histocompatibility loci<span> hampers the ability to leverage these factors toward improving transplant outcomes. Despite conflicting reports of the effect of donor–recipient sex mismatch on renal allografts<span>, the association between acute rejection<span> of renal allografts and the development of human alloantibodies to the male H-Y antigen suggested to us that donor–recipient sex mismatch deserved re-evaluation.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether the relationships between donor sex and allograft failure differed by recipient sex.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We studied recipients of deceased-donor (n = 125,369) and living-donor (n = 63,139) transplants in the United States Renal Data System. Using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by donor type, we estimated the association between donor–recipient sex mismatch and death-censored allograft failure with adjustment for known risk factors, with and without the use of multiple imputation methods to account for potential bias and/or loss of efficiency due to missing data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The advantage afforded by male donor kidneys was more pronounced among male than among female recipients (8% vs 2% relative risk reduction; interaction </span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). This difference is of the order of magnitude of several other risk factors affecting donor selection decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>Donor–recipient sex mismatch affects renal allograft survival in a direction consistent with immune responses to sexually determined </span>minor histocompatibility antigens. Our study provides a paradigm for clinical detection of markers for minor histocompatibility loci.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 335-347.e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.004\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550857912001350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550857912001350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

缺乏可靠的人类替代次要(即非hla)组织相容性位点阻碍了利用这些因素改善移植结果的能力。尽管关于供体-受体性别错配对同种异体肾移植的影响的报道相互矛盾,但同种异体肾移植急性排斥反应与人类对男性H-Y抗原产生同种异体抗体之间的关系表明,供体-受体性别错配值得重新评估。目的探讨供体性别与同种异体移植失败的关系是否因受体性别而异。方法我们研究了美国肾脏数据系统中死亡供者(n = 125,369)和活体供者(n = 63,139)的移植受者。使用按供体类型分层的Cox比例风险模型,我们估计了供体-受体性别不匹配与死亡审查的同种异体移植物失败之间的关系,调整了已知的风险因素,并使用和不使用多种imputation方法来解释数据缺失导致的潜在偏差和/或效率损失。结果男性供肾的优势在男性中比在女性受体中更为明显(相对风险降低8% vs 2%;相互作用P <0.01)。这种差异是影响供体选择决定的其他几个风险因素的数量级。结论供体-受体性别错配影响同种异体肾移植存活的方向与对性别决定的次要组织相容性抗原的免疫应答一致。我们的研究为临床检测次要组织相容性位点的标记提供了一个范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Donor–Recipient Sex Mismatch in Kidney Transplantation

Background

The lack of reliable human proxies for minor (ie, non-HLA) histocompatibility loci hampers the ability to leverage these factors toward improving transplant outcomes. Despite conflicting reports of the effect of donor–recipient sex mismatch on renal allografts, the association between acute rejection of renal allografts and the development of human alloantibodies to the male H-Y antigen suggested to us that donor–recipient sex mismatch deserved re-evaluation.

Objective

To evaluate whether the relationships between donor sex and allograft failure differed by recipient sex.

Methods

We studied recipients of deceased-donor (n = 125,369) and living-donor (n = 63,139) transplants in the United States Renal Data System. Using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by donor type, we estimated the association between donor–recipient sex mismatch and death-censored allograft failure with adjustment for known risk factors, with and without the use of multiple imputation methods to account for potential bias and/or loss of efficiency due to missing data.

Results

The advantage afforded by male donor kidneys was more pronounced among male than among female recipients (8% vs 2% relative risk reduction; interaction P < 0.01). This difference is of the order of magnitude of several other risk factors affecting donor selection decisions.

Conclusions

Donor–recipient sex mismatch affects renal allograft survival in a direction consistent with immune responses to sexually determined minor histocompatibility antigens. Our study provides a paradigm for clinical detection of markers for minor histocompatibility loci.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender Medicine
Gender Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vernetzung als Wissenspraktik der deutschsprachigen Lesben-/Frauenarchive und -bibliotheken in ihren Entstehungsjahren seit 1977 Die „grausamen Zyklen von Wiederholungen“ durchbrechen – wie Frauenbewegungen in das kulturelle Gedächtnis gelangen Vergessene Pionierinnen? Die Ausstellung Künstlerinnen international 1877–1977 als historiografische Intervention und Inspiration Norman Domeier/Christian Mühling (Hrsg.), 2020: Homosexualität am Hof. Praktiken und Diskurse vom Mittelalter bis heute. Frankfurt/Main: Campus. 403 Seiten. 39,95 Euro Michele White/Diane Negra (eds.), 2022: Anti-Feminisms in Media Culture. New York, London: Routledge. 212 pages. £ 35.99
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1