在生命结束时避免有害的姑息性化疗治疗:制定一份简短的患者完成的问卷,用于常规评估表现状态。

The journal of supportive oncology Pub Date : 2012-11-01 Epub Date: 2012-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.suponc.2012.06.003
Ulla Näppä, Olav Lindqvist, Bertil Axelsson
{"title":"在生命结束时避免有害的姑息性化疗治疗:制定一份简短的患者完成的问卷,用于常规评估表现状态。","authors":"Ulla Näppä,&nbsp;Olav Lindqvist,&nbsp;Bertil Axelsson","doi":"10.1016/j.suponc.2012.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Earlier studies have shown that up to 43% of patients with incurable cancer are treated with palliative chemotherapy in the last month of their lives. Although pretreatment blood tests are acceptable, the patient's general condition may not permit further palliative chemotherapy treatment (PCT). Presently, there is no patient self-assessment tool available to monitor performance status during PCT.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the development process of the Performance Status in Palliative Chemotherapy (PSPC) questionnaire, and the testing of its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire was developed by the authors based on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Rating (ECOG PSR) scale as well as their clinical experience with PCT. Adult patients who were diagnosed with epithelial cancers (n = 118) were enrolled to test the PSPC questionnaire for reliability, sensitivity for change, and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After stepwise modifications of the PSPC questionnaire, psychometric tests revealed acceptable values for reliability (via a test-retest method), sensitivity for change (via a comparison of patients with progressive disease over time), and validity (via a comparison of the PSPC vs the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>At this stage of questionnaire development, we are unable to conclude whether the PSPC is superior to the conventional ECOG PSR in the evaluation of performance status and the prediction of chemotherapy response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychometric tests suggest that the PSPC questionnaire may be a useful patient-completed tool in the late stages of cancer disease to routinely monitor performance status in palliative chemotherapy treatments so as to minimize the risk of inflicting more harm than good.</p>","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":"10 6","pages":"230-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.06.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Avoiding harmful palliative chemotherapy treatment in the end of life: development of a brief patient-completed questionnaire for routine assessment of performance status.\",\"authors\":\"Ulla Näppä,&nbsp;Olav Lindqvist,&nbsp;Bertil Axelsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suponc.2012.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Earlier studies have shown that up to 43% of patients with incurable cancer are treated with palliative chemotherapy in the last month of their lives. Although pretreatment blood tests are acceptable, the patient's general condition may not permit further palliative chemotherapy treatment (PCT). Presently, there is no patient self-assessment tool available to monitor performance status during PCT.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the development process of the Performance Status in Palliative Chemotherapy (PSPC) questionnaire, and the testing of its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire was developed by the authors based on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Rating (ECOG PSR) scale as well as their clinical experience with PCT. Adult patients who were diagnosed with epithelial cancers (n = 118) were enrolled to test the PSPC questionnaire for reliability, sensitivity for change, and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After stepwise modifications of the PSPC questionnaire, psychometric tests revealed acceptable values for reliability (via a test-retest method), sensitivity for change (via a comparison of patients with progressive disease over time), and validity (via a comparison of the PSPC vs the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>At this stage of questionnaire development, we are unable to conclude whether the PSPC is superior to the conventional ECOG PSR in the evaluation of performance status and the prediction of chemotherapy response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychometric tests suggest that the PSPC questionnaire may be a useful patient-completed tool in the late stages of cancer disease to routinely monitor performance status in palliative chemotherapy treatments so as to minimize the risk of inflicting more harm than good.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of supportive oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"230-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.06.003\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of supportive oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.06.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.06.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:早期的研究表明,高达43%的无法治愈的癌症患者在生命的最后一个月接受了姑息性化疗。虽然前血液检查是可以接受的,但患者的一般情况可能不允许进一步姑息性化疗(PCT)。目前,还没有一种可用于监测姑息化疗过程中患者表现状态的自我评估工具。目的:描述姑息化疗表现状态(PSPC)问卷的开发过程,并对其心理测量特性进行测试。方法:作者根据东部肿瘤合作小组绩效状态评定量表(ECOG PSR)以及他们在PCT方面的临床经验编制问卷,纳入确诊为上皮性肿瘤的成年患者(n = 118),对PSPC问卷的信度、变化敏感性和效度进行检验。结果:在逐步修改PSPC问卷后,心理测量测试显示了可接受的信度值(通过重新测试方法),对变化的敏感性(通过对进展性疾病患者的比较)和效度(通过PSPC与埃德蒙顿症状评估系统[ESAS]的比较)。局限性:在问卷开发的这个阶段,我们无法得出PSPC在评估表现状态和预测化疗反应方面是否优于传统ECOG PSR的结论。结论:心理测试提示PSPC问卷可作为晚期癌症患者在姑息性化疗中常规监测表现状态的有用工具,以减少弊大于利的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Avoiding harmful palliative chemotherapy treatment in the end of life: development of a brief patient-completed questionnaire for routine assessment of performance status.

Background: Earlier studies have shown that up to 43% of patients with incurable cancer are treated with palliative chemotherapy in the last month of their lives. Although pretreatment blood tests are acceptable, the patient's general condition may not permit further palliative chemotherapy treatment (PCT). Presently, there is no patient self-assessment tool available to monitor performance status during PCT.

Objectives: To describe the development process of the Performance Status in Palliative Chemotherapy (PSPC) questionnaire, and the testing of its psychometric properties.

Methods: The questionnaire was developed by the authors based on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Rating (ECOG PSR) scale as well as their clinical experience with PCT. Adult patients who were diagnosed with epithelial cancers (n = 118) were enrolled to test the PSPC questionnaire for reliability, sensitivity for change, and validity.

Results: After stepwise modifications of the PSPC questionnaire, psychometric tests revealed acceptable values for reliability (via a test-retest method), sensitivity for change (via a comparison of patients with progressive disease over time), and validity (via a comparison of the PSPC vs the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]).

Limitations: At this stage of questionnaire development, we are unable to conclude whether the PSPC is superior to the conventional ECOG PSR in the evaluation of performance status and the prediction of chemotherapy response.

Conclusion: Psychometric tests suggest that the PSPC questionnaire may be a useful patient-completed tool in the late stages of cancer disease to routinely monitor performance status in palliative chemotherapy treatments so as to minimize the risk of inflicting more harm than good.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the quality of palliative care and supportive oncology: principles and practice. Illness perceptions matter: understanding quality of life and advanced illness behaviors in female patients with late-stage cancer. Monitoring of health-related quality of life and symptoms in prostate cancer survivors: a randomized trial. Characterization of skin reactions and pain reported by patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer at different sites. Whole brain radiotherapy for poor prognosis patients with brain metastases: predictably poor results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1