普外科住院医师修复与减员:一项多机构研究。

Arezou Yaghoubian, Joseph Galante, Amy Kaji, Mark Reeves, Marc Melcher, Ali Salim, Matthew Dolich, Christian de Virgilio
{"title":"普外科住院医师修复与减员:一项多机构研究。","authors":"Arezou Yaghoubian,&nbsp;Joseph Galante,&nbsp;Amy Kaji,&nbsp;Mark Reeves,&nbsp;Marc Melcher,&nbsp;Ali Salim,&nbsp;Matthew Dolich,&nbsp;Christian de Virgilio","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the rates and predictors of remediation and attrition among general surgery residents.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Eleven-year retrospective analysis of 348 categorical general surgery residents at 6 West Coast programs.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rates and predictors of remediation and attrition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred forty-eight categorical general surgery residents were included. One hundred seven residents (31%) required remediation, of which 27 were remediated more than once. Fifty-five residents (15.8%) left their programs, although only 2 were owing to failed remediation. Remediation was not a predictor of attrition (20% attrition for those remediated vs 15% who were not [P = .40]). Remediation was most frequently initiated owing to a deficiency in medical knowledge (74%). Remediation consisted of monthly meetings with faculty (79%), reading assignments (72%), required conferences (27%), therapy (12%), and repeating a clinical year (6.5%). On univariate analysis, predictors of remediation included receiving honors in the third-year surgery clerkship, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 and/or step 2, and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores at postgraduate years 1 through 4. On multivariable regression analysis, remediation was associated with receiving honors in surgery (odds ratio, 1.9; P = .01) and USMLE step 1 score (odds ratio, 0.9; P = .02). On univariate analysis, the only predictor of attrition was the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination score at the postgraduate year 3 level (P = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost one third of categorical general surgery residents required remediation during residency, which was most often owing to medical knowledge deficits. Lower USMLE step 1 scores were predictors of the need for remediation. Most remediated residents successfully completed the program. Given the high rates of remediation and the increased educational burden on clinical faculty, medical schools need to focus on better preparing students to enter surgical residency.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"829-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1676","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General surgery resident remediation and attrition: a multi-institutional study.\",\"authors\":\"Arezou Yaghoubian,&nbsp;Joseph Galante,&nbsp;Amy Kaji,&nbsp;Mark Reeves,&nbsp;Marc Melcher,&nbsp;Ali Salim,&nbsp;Matthew Dolich,&nbsp;Christian de Virgilio\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the rates and predictors of remediation and attrition among general surgery residents.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Eleven-year retrospective analysis of 348 categorical general surgery residents at 6 West Coast programs.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rates and predictors of remediation and attrition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred forty-eight categorical general surgery residents were included. One hundred seven residents (31%) required remediation, of which 27 were remediated more than once. Fifty-five residents (15.8%) left their programs, although only 2 were owing to failed remediation. Remediation was not a predictor of attrition (20% attrition for those remediated vs 15% who were not [P = .40]). Remediation was most frequently initiated owing to a deficiency in medical knowledge (74%). Remediation consisted of monthly meetings with faculty (79%), reading assignments (72%), required conferences (27%), therapy (12%), and repeating a clinical year (6.5%). On univariate analysis, predictors of remediation included receiving honors in the third-year surgery clerkship, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 and/or step 2, and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores at postgraduate years 1 through 4. On multivariable regression analysis, remediation was associated with receiving honors in surgery (odds ratio, 1.9; P = .01) and USMLE step 1 score (odds ratio, 0.9; P = .02). On univariate analysis, the only predictor of attrition was the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination score at the postgraduate year 3 level (P = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost one third of categorical general surgery residents required remediation during residency, which was most often owing to medical knowledge deficits. Lower USMLE step 1 scores were predictors of the need for remediation. Most remediated residents successfully completed the program. Given the high rates of remediation and the increased educational burden on clinical faculty, medical schools need to focus on better preparing students to enter surgical residency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"147 9\",\"pages\":\"829-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1676\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1676\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

目的:了解普通外科住院医师的康复率和减员率及其预测因素。设计、环境和参与者:对西海岸6个项目的348名分类普通外科住院医生进行了11年的回顾性分析。主要结果测量:修复和磨损的比率和预测因素。结果:共纳入348名普通外科住院医师。107名居民(31%)需要修复,其中27名居民修复了一次以上。55名居民(15.8%)离开了他们的项目,尽管只有2名是由于整改失败。补救措施并不能预测员工的流失率(接受补救措施的员工流失率为20%,未接受补救措施的员工流失率为15% [P = .40])。补救措施最常见的原因是缺乏医学知识(74%)。补救措施包括每月与教师开会(79%)、阅读作业(72%)、必要的会议(27%)、治疗(12%)和重复临床年(6.5%)。在单变量分析中,补救的预测因素包括在第三年外科实习中获得荣誉,美国医疗执照考试(USMLE)第1步和/或第2步,以及在研究生1至4年的美国外科培训委员会考试成绩。在多变量回归分析中,补救措施与获得外科荣誉相关(优势比,1.9;P = 0.01)和USMLE第一步评分(优势比,0.9;P = .02)。在单变量分析中,唯一的减员预测因子是研究生三年级水平的美国外科培训考试委员会分数(P = 0.04)。结论:近三分之一的普通外科住院医师在住院期间需要补习,这主要是由于医学知识的不足。较低的USMLE第1步分数是需要补救的预测因子。大多数被修复的居民都成功地完成了这个项目。鉴于高补习率和临床教师教育负担的增加,医学院需要把重点放在更好地为学生进入外科住院医师做好准备上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
General surgery resident remediation and attrition: a multi-institutional study.

Objective: To determine the rates and predictors of remediation and attrition among general surgery residents.

Design, setting, and participants: Eleven-year retrospective analysis of 348 categorical general surgery residents at 6 West Coast programs.

Main outcome measures: Rates and predictors of remediation and attrition.

Results: Three hundred forty-eight categorical general surgery residents were included. One hundred seven residents (31%) required remediation, of which 27 were remediated more than once. Fifty-five residents (15.8%) left their programs, although only 2 were owing to failed remediation. Remediation was not a predictor of attrition (20% attrition for those remediated vs 15% who were not [P = .40]). Remediation was most frequently initiated owing to a deficiency in medical knowledge (74%). Remediation consisted of monthly meetings with faculty (79%), reading assignments (72%), required conferences (27%), therapy (12%), and repeating a clinical year (6.5%). On univariate analysis, predictors of remediation included receiving honors in the third-year surgery clerkship, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 and/or step 2, and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores at postgraduate years 1 through 4. On multivariable regression analysis, remediation was associated with receiving honors in surgery (odds ratio, 1.9; P = .01) and USMLE step 1 score (odds ratio, 0.9; P = .02). On univariate analysis, the only predictor of attrition was the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination score at the postgraduate year 3 level (P = .04).

Conclusions: Almost one third of categorical general surgery residents required remediation during residency, which was most often owing to medical knowledge deficits. Lower USMLE step 1 scores were predictors of the need for remediation. Most remediated residents successfully completed the program. Given the high rates of remediation and the increased educational burden on clinical faculty, medical schools need to focus on better preparing students to enter surgical residency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Surgery
Archives of Surgery 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Breast and Thyroid Cancer: Correlation Between two Pathologies and Management Challenges Vascularized Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Entrapment Syndrome at the Elbow Pseudohermaphroditism. Brothers. Preoperative biopsy evaluation of chemotherapy-associated liver injuries: looking for a needle in a haystack? Comment on "prospective evaluation of accuracy of liver biopsy findings in the identification of chemotherapy-associated liver injury".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1