乳腺癌妇女术前选择性磁共振成像:未降低再手术率。

Joseph J Weber, Lisa S Bellin, David E Milbourn, Kathryn M Verbanac, Jan H Wong
{"title":"乳腺癌妇女术前选择性磁共振成像:未降低再手术率。","authors":"Joseph J Weber,&nbsp;Lisa S Bellin,&nbsp;David E Milbourn,&nbsp;Kathryn M Verbanac,&nbsp;Jan H Wong","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The use of preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may have an effect on the reoperation rate in women with operable breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Women with operable breast cancer treated by a single surgeon between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2010.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Selective preoperative MR imaging based on breast density and histologic findings.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Reoperation rate and pathologically avoidable mastectomy at initial operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 313 patients in the study, 120 underwent preoperative MR imaging. Patients undergoing MR imaging were younger (mean age, 53.6 vs 59.5 years; P < .001), were more often of non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity (61.7% vs 52.3%, P < .05), and more likely had heterogeneously dense or very dense breasts (68.4% vs 22.3%, P < .001). The incidence of lobular carcinoma (8.3% in the MR imaging group vs 5.2% in the no MR imaging group, P = .27) and the type of surgery performed (mastectomy vs partial mastectomy, P = .67) were similar in both groups. The mean pathological size of the index tumor in the MR imaging group was larger than that in the no MR imaging group (2.02 vs 1.72 cm, P = .009), but the extent of disease was comparable (75.8% in the MR imaging group vs 82.9% in the no MR imaging group had pathologically localized disease, P = .26). The reoperation rate was similar between the 2 groups (19.1% in the MR imaging group vs 17.6% in the no MR imaging group, P = .91) even when stratified by breast density (P = .76), pT2 tumor size (P = .35), or lobular carcinoma histologic findings (P = .26). Pathologically avoidable mastectomy (multifocal or multicentric MR imaging and unifocal histopathological findings) was observed in 12 of 47 patients (25.5%) with preoperative MR imaging who underwent mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The selective use of preoperative MR imaging to decrease reoperation in women with breast cancer is not supported by these data. In a considerable number of patients, MR imaging overestimates the extent of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"834-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1660","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in women with breast cancer: no reduction in the reoperation rate.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph J Weber,&nbsp;Lisa S Bellin,&nbsp;David E Milbourn,&nbsp;Kathryn M Verbanac,&nbsp;Jan H Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The use of preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may have an effect on the reoperation rate in women with operable breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Women with operable breast cancer treated by a single surgeon between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2010.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Selective preoperative MR imaging based on breast density and histologic findings.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Reoperation rate and pathologically avoidable mastectomy at initial operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 313 patients in the study, 120 underwent preoperative MR imaging. Patients undergoing MR imaging were younger (mean age, 53.6 vs 59.5 years; P < .001), were more often of non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity (61.7% vs 52.3%, P < .05), and more likely had heterogeneously dense or very dense breasts (68.4% vs 22.3%, P < .001). The incidence of lobular carcinoma (8.3% in the MR imaging group vs 5.2% in the no MR imaging group, P = .27) and the type of surgery performed (mastectomy vs partial mastectomy, P = .67) were similar in both groups. The mean pathological size of the index tumor in the MR imaging group was larger than that in the no MR imaging group (2.02 vs 1.72 cm, P = .009), but the extent of disease was comparable (75.8% in the MR imaging group vs 82.9% in the no MR imaging group had pathologically localized disease, P = .26). The reoperation rate was similar between the 2 groups (19.1% in the MR imaging group vs 17.6% in the no MR imaging group, P = .91) even when stratified by breast density (P = .76), pT2 tumor size (P = .35), or lobular carcinoma histologic findings (P = .26). Pathologically avoidable mastectomy (multifocal or multicentric MR imaging and unifocal histopathological findings) was observed in 12 of 47 patients (25.5%) with preoperative MR imaging who underwent mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The selective use of preoperative MR imaging to decrease reoperation in women with breast cancer is not supported by these data. In a considerable number of patients, MR imaging overestimates the extent of disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"147 9\",\"pages\":\"834-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1660\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

假设:术前磁共振(MR)成像可能对可手术乳腺癌患者的再手术率有影响。设计:回顾性队列研究。地点:大学医疗中心。患者:2006年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间接受单一外科医生治疗的可手术乳腺癌患者。干预:术前选择性磁共振成像基于乳腺密度和组织学表现。主要观察指标:术后再手术率及病理可避免的乳房切除术。结果:在研究的313例患者中,120例接受了术前磁共振成像。接受磁共振成像的患者更年轻(平均年龄,53.6 vs 59.5岁;P < .001),非西班牙裔白人/族裔(61.7%对52.3%,P < .05),更可能患有异质性致密或非常致密的乳房(68.4%对22.3%,P < .001)。两组小叶癌的发生率(磁共振成像组为8.3%,无磁共振成像组为5.2%,P = 0.27)和手术类型(乳房切除术与部分乳房切除术,P = 0.67)相似。磁共振成像组指数肿瘤的平均病理大小大于无磁共振成像组(2.02 vs 1.72 cm, P = 0.009),但病变程度相当(75.8%的磁共振成像组vs 82.9%的无磁共振成像组,P = 0.26)。即使按乳腺密度(P = 0.76)、pT2肿瘤大小(P = 0.35)或小叶癌组织学表现(P = 0.26)分层,两组的再手术率相似(磁共振成像组19.1% vs无磁共振成像组17.6%,P = 0.91)。47例术前mri行乳房切除术的患者中有12例(25.5%)发现病理上可避免的乳房切除术(多灶或多中心MR成像和单灶组织病理学发现)。结论:术前选择性使用磁共振成像来减少乳腺癌患者的再手术,这些数据不支持。在相当数量的患者中,MR成像高估了疾病的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selective preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in women with breast cancer: no reduction in the reoperation rate.

Hypothesis: The use of preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may have an effect on the reoperation rate in women with operable breast cancer.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: University medical center.

Patients: Women with operable breast cancer treated by a single surgeon between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2010.

Intervention: Selective preoperative MR imaging based on breast density and histologic findings.

Main outcome measures: Reoperation rate and pathologically avoidable mastectomy at initial operation.

Results: Of 313 patients in the study, 120 underwent preoperative MR imaging. Patients undergoing MR imaging were younger (mean age, 53.6 vs 59.5 years; P < .001), were more often of non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity (61.7% vs 52.3%, P < .05), and more likely had heterogeneously dense or very dense breasts (68.4% vs 22.3%, P < .001). The incidence of lobular carcinoma (8.3% in the MR imaging group vs 5.2% in the no MR imaging group, P = .27) and the type of surgery performed (mastectomy vs partial mastectomy, P = .67) were similar in both groups. The mean pathological size of the index tumor in the MR imaging group was larger than that in the no MR imaging group (2.02 vs 1.72 cm, P = .009), but the extent of disease was comparable (75.8% in the MR imaging group vs 82.9% in the no MR imaging group had pathologically localized disease, P = .26). The reoperation rate was similar between the 2 groups (19.1% in the MR imaging group vs 17.6% in the no MR imaging group, P = .91) even when stratified by breast density (P = .76), pT2 tumor size (P = .35), or lobular carcinoma histologic findings (P = .26). Pathologically avoidable mastectomy (multifocal or multicentric MR imaging and unifocal histopathological findings) was observed in 12 of 47 patients (25.5%) with preoperative MR imaging who underwent mastectomy.

Conclusion: The selective use of preoperative MR imaging to decrease reoperation in women with breast cancer is not supported by these data. In a considerable number of patients, MR imaging overestimates the extent of disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Surgery
Archives of Surgery 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Breast and Thyroid Cancer: Correlation Between two Pathologies and Management Challenges Vascularized Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Entrapment Syndrome at the Elbow Pseudohermaphroditism. Brothers. Preoperative biopsy evaluation of chemotherapy-associated liver injuries: looking for a needle in a haystack? Comment on "prospective evaluation of accuracy of liver biopsy findings in the identification of chemotherapy-associated liver injury".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1