在手术室触诊是手术计划的最佳方法吗?

Richard J Bold
{"title":"在手术室触诊是手术计划的最佳方法吗?","authors":"Richard J Bold","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.2165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surgical resection of isolated pulmonary metastatic melanoma improves overall survival in a highly select group of patients. However, the devil is in the details. By that, I mean that a critical examination of how these “selected” patients are identified needs to be made to ensure a benefit from the surgical intervention while sparing those patients with poor outcomes the complications of a thoracic operation. Peterson et al 1 reported a series of more than 1700 patients with pulmonary metastasis from cutaneous melanoma; less than 20% underwent resection of the metastatic disease to the lung. From this and other studies, those patients most likely to benefit harbor solitary lesions; furthermore, incomplete resection offers minimal improvement in survival. Chua et al 2 recently reported a single-institution series of 292 consecutive patients; the median survival for patients undergoing resection of a solitary melanoma metastasis was 35 months, decreasing to 21 months for 2 or 3 melanoma metastases and 10 months for more than 3 distinct lesions, 2 which is not different from the median survival of 8 months for those patients who did not undergo resection of pulmonary metastatic melanoma. 1 Therefore, the preoperative selection of patients is essential to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thoracic surgery and to spare an unnecessary and potentially morbid operation for those who will not benefit. In the current series 3 reported from the group at the John Wayne Cancer Institute in Santa Monica, California,reportedinthisissueofArchives,26%ofpatientstaken to the operating room for a thoracic resection of pulmonary melanoma metastases have more lesions than anticipated based on preoperative imaging using contrastenhancedcomputedtomography.Theseadditionallesions were small (median size of 5 mm) and located in a different lobe than the index lesion in one-third of patients. Although Kidner et al 3 recommend caution when considering a thoracoscopic approach (because the additional lesions were identified by palpation or visual inspection), their data are really a plea for better preoperative imaging for more accurate patient selection. As additional unsuspected lesions are identified during the exploratory phase of the operation, the benefits of resection start to decrease. Although resection of all palpable or noticeable melanomas may seem a surgical success, biologywilltriumphattheendoftheday.Wemuststrive to move from “selected” patients for surgical procedures to “accurately and individually selected” patients. Until then, a surgeon’s hands may be the best tool to facilitate surgical planning.","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"875"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.2165","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is palpation in the operating room the best method for surgical planning?\",\"authors\":\"Richard J Bold\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archsurg.2012.2165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surgical resection of isolated pulmonary metastatic melanoma improves overall survival in a highly select group of patients. However, the devil is in the details. By that, I mean that a critical examination of how these “selected” patients are identified needs to be made to ensure a benefit from the surgical intervention while sparing those patients with poor outcomes the complications of a thoracic operation. Peterson et al 1 reported a series of more than 1700 patients with pulmonary metastasis from cutaneous melanoma; less than 20% underwent resection of the metastatic disease to the lung. From this and other studies, those patients most likely to benefit harbor solitary lesions; furthermore, incomplete resection offers minimal improvement in survival. Chua et al 2 recently reported a single-institution series of 292 consecutive patients; the median survival for patients undergoing resection of a solitary melanoma metastasis was 35 months, decreasing to 21 months for 2 or 3 melanoma metastases and 10 months for more than 3 distinct lesions, 2 which is not different from the median survival of 8 months for those patients who did not undergo resection of pulmonary metastatic melanoma. 1 Therefore, the preoperative selection of patients is essential to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thoracic surgery and to spare an unnecessary and potentially morbid operation for those who will not benefit. In the current series 3 reported from the group at the John Wayne Cancer Institute in Santa Monica, California,reportedinthisissueofArchives,26%ofpatientstaken to the operating room for a thoracic resection of pulmonary melanoma metastases have more lesions than anticipated based on preoperative imaging using contrastenhancedcomputedtomography.Theseadditionallesions were small (median size of 5 mm) and located in a different lobe than the index lesion in one-third of patients. Although Kidner et al 3 recommend caution when considering a thoracoscopic approach (because the additional lesions were identified by palpation or visual inspection), their data are really a plea for better preoperative imaging for more accurate patient selection. As additional unsuspected lesions are identified during the exploratory phase of the operation, the benefits of resection start to decrease. Although resection of all palpable or noticeable melanomas may seem a surgical success, biologywilltriumphattheendoftheday.Wemuststrive to move from “selected” patients for surgical procedures to “accurately and individually selected” patients. Until then, a surgeon’s hands may be the best tool to facilitate surgical planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"147 9\",\"pages\":\"875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.2165\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.2165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.2165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is palpation in the operating room the best method for surgical planning?
Surgical resection of isolated pulmonary metastatic melanoma improves overall survival in a highly select group of patients. However, the devil is in the details. By that, I mean that a critical examination of how these “selected” patients are identified needs to be made to ensure a benefit from the surgical intervention while sparing those patients with poor outcomes the complications of a thoracic operation. Peterson et al 1 reported a series of more than 1700 patients with pulmonary metastasis from cutaneous melanoma; less than 20% underwent resection of the metastatic disease to the lung. From this and other studies, those patients most likely to benefit harbor solitary lesions; furthermore, incomplete resection offers minimal improvement in survival. Chua et al 2 recently reported a single-institution series of 292 consecutive patients; the median survival for patients undergoing resection of a solitary melanoma metastasis was 35 months, decreasing to 21 months for 2 or 3 melanoma metastases and 10 months for more than 3 distinct lesions, 2 which is not different from the median survival of 8 months for those patients who did not undergo resection of pulmonary metastatic melanoma. 1 Therefore, the preoperative selection of patients is essential to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thoracic surgery and to spare an unnecessary and potentially morbid operation for those who will not benefit. In the current series 3 reported from the group at the John Wayne Cancer Institute in Santa Monica, California,reportedinthisissueofArchives,26%ofpatientstaken to the operating room for a thoracic resection of pulmonary melanoma metastases have more lesions than anticipated based on preoperative imaging using contrastenhancedcomputedtomography.Theseadditionallesions were small (median size of 5 mm) and located in a different lobe than the index lesion in one-third of patients. Although Kidner et al 3 recommend caution when considering a thoracoscopic approach (because the additional lesions were identified by palpation or visual inspection), their data are really a plea for better preoperative imaging for more accurate patient selection. As additional unsuspected lesions are identified during the exploratory phase of the operation, the benefits of resection start to decrease. Although resection of all palpable or noticeable melanomas may seem a surgical success, biologywilltriumphattheendoftheday.Wemuststrive to move from “selected” patients for surgical procedures to “accurately and individually selected” patients. Until then, a surgeon’s hands may be the best tool to facilitate surgical planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Surgery
Archives of Surgery 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Breast and Thyroid Cancer: Correlation Between two Pathologies and Management Challenges Vascularized Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Entrapment Syndrome at the Elbow Pseudohermaphroditism. Brothers. Preoperative biopsy evaluation of chemotherapy-associated liver injuries: looking for a needle in a haystack? Comment on "prospective evaluation of accuracy of liver biopsy findings in the identification of chemotherapy-associated liver injury".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1