询问自杀筛查问题(ASQ):儿科急诊科的一个简短工具。

Lisa M Horowitz, Jeffrey A Bridge, Stephen J Teach, Elizabeth Ballard, Jennifer Klima, Donald L Rosenstein, Elizabeth A Wharff, Katherine Ginnis, Elizabeth Cannon, Paramjit Joshi, Maryland Pao
{"title":"询问自杀筛查问题(ASQ):儿科急诊科的一个简短工具。","authors":"Lisa M Horowitz,&nbsp;Jeffrey A Bridge,&nbsp;Stephen J Teach,&nbsp;Elizabeth Ballard,&nbsp;Jennifer Klima,&nbsp;Donald L Rosenstein,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Wharff,&nbsp;Katherine Ginnis,&nbsp;Elizabeth Cannon,&nbsp;Paramjit Joshi,&nbsp;Maryland Pao","doi":"10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a brief screening instrument to assess the risk for suicide in pediatric emergency department patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, cross-sectional instrument-development study evaluated 17 candidate screening questions assessing suicide risk in young patients. The Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire served as the criterion standard.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three urban, pediatric emergency departments associated with tertiary care teaching hospitals.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A convenience sample of 524 patients aged 10 to 21 years who presented with either medical/surgical or psychiatric chief concerns to the emergency department between September 10, 2008, and January 5, 2011.</p><p><strong>Main exposures: </strong>Participants answered 17 candidate questions followed by the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the best-fitting combinations of screening questions for detecting elevated risk for suicide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 524 patients were screened (344 medical/surgical and 180 psychiatric). Fourteen of the medical/surgical patients (4%) and 84 of the psychiatric patients (47%) were at elevated suicide risk on the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire. Of the 17 candidate questions, the best-fitting model comprised 4 questions assessing current thoughts of being better off dead, current wish to die, current suicidal ideation, and past suicide attempt. This model had a sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI, 91.3-99.4), specificity of 87.6% (95% CI, 84.0-90.5), and negative predictive values of 99.7% (95% CI, 98.2-99.9) for medical/surgical patients and 96.9% (95% CI, 89.3-99.6) for psychiatric patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 4-question screening instrument, the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ), with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, can identify the risk for suicide in patients presenting to pediatric emergency departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8310,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine","volume":"166 12","pages":"1170-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1276","citationCount":"318","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ): a brief instrument for the pediatric emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa M Horowitz,&nbsp;Jeffrey A Bridge,&nbsp;Stephen J Teach,&nbsp;Elizabeth Ballard,&nbsp;Jennifer Klima,&nbsp;Donald L Rosenstein,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Wharff,&nbsp;Katherine Ginnis,&nbsp;Elizabeth Cannon,&nbsp;Paramjit Joshi,&nbsp;Maryland Pao\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a brief screening instrument to assess the risk for suicide in pediatric emergency department patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, cross-sectional instrument-development study evaluated 17 candidate screening questions assessing suicide risk in young patients. The Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire served as the criterion standard.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three urban, pediatric emergency departments associated with tertiary care teaching hospitals.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A convenience sample of 524 patients aged 10 to 21 years who presented with either medical/surgical or psychiatric chief concerns to the emergency department between September 10, 2008, and January 5, 2011.</p><p><strong>Main exposures: </strong>Participants answered 17 candidate questions followed by the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the best-fitting combinations of screening questions for detecting elevated risk for suicide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 524 patients were screened (344 medical/surgical and 180 psychiatric). Fourteen of the medical/surgical patients (4%) and 84 of the psychiatric patients (47%) were at elevated suicide risk on the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire. Of the 17 candidate questions, the best-fitting model comprised 4 questions assessing current thoughts of being better off dead, current wish to die, current suicidal ideation, and past suicide attempt. This model had a sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI, 91.3-99.4), specificity of 87.6% (95% CI, 84.0-90.5), and negative predictive values of 99.7% (95% CI, 98.2-99.9) for medical/surgical patients and 96.9% (95% CI, 89.3-99.6) for psychiatric patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 4-question screening instrument, the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ), with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, can identify the risk for suicide in patients presenting to pediatric emergency departments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine\",\"volume\":\"166 12\",\"pages\":\"1170-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1276\",\"citationCount\":\"318\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 318

摘要

目的:开发一种简单的筛查工具来评估儿科急诊患者的自杀风险。设计:一项前瞻性、横断面的仪器开发研究评估了17个评估年轻患者自杀风险的候选筛查问题。自杀意念问卷作为标准。设置:三个城市儿科急诊科与三级护理教学医院相关联。参与者:2008年9月10日至2011年1月5日期间,524名年龄在10至21岁之间的患者向急诊科提出了医疗/外科或精神科的主要问题。主要暴露:参与者回答了17个候选问题,然后是自杀意念问卷。主要结果指标:用于检测自杀风险升高的筛查问题的最佳拟合组合的敏感性、特异性、预测值、似然比和受试者操作特征曲线下面积。结果:共筛查524名患者(344名内科/外科患者和180名精神科患者)。在自杀意念问卷中,14名内科/外科患者(4%)和84名精神病患者(47%)的自杀风险较高。在17个候选问题中,最适合的模型包括4个问题,评估当前对死亡更好的想法、当前的死亡愿望、当前的自杀意念和过去的自杀企图。该模型对内科/外科患者的敏感性为96.9%(95%CI,91.3-99.4),特异性为87.6%(95%CI,84.0-90.5),对精神病患者的阴性预测值为99.7%(95%CI,98.2-99.9)和96.9%(95%CCI,89.3-99.6)。结论:提出自杀筛查问题(ASQ)是一种4个问题的筛查工具,具有高灵敏度和阴性预测价值,可以识别儿科急诊患者的自杀风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ): a brief instrument for the pediatric emergency department.

Objective: To develop a brief screening instrument to assess the risk for suicide in pediatric emergency department patients.

Design: A prospective, cross-sectional instrument-development study evaluated 17 candidate screening questions assessing suicide risk in young patients. The Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire served as the criterion standard.

Setting: Three urban, pediatric emergency departments associated with tertiary care teaching hospitals.

Participants: A convenience sample of 524 patients aged 10 to 21 years who presented with either medical/surgical or psychiatric chief concerns to the emergency department between September 10, 2008, and January 5, 2011.

Main exposures: Participants answered 17 candidate questions followed by the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire.

Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the best-fitting combinations of screening questions for detecting elevated risk for suicide.

Results: A total of 524 patients were screened (344 medical/surgical and 180 psychiatric). Fourteen of the medical/surgical patients (4%) and 84 of the psychiatric patients (47%) were at elevated suicide risk on the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire. Of the 17 candidate questions, the best-fitting model comprised 4 questions assessing current thoughts of being better off dead, current wish to die, current suicidal ideation, and past suicide attempt. This model had a sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI, 91.3-99.4), specificity of 87.6% (95% CI, 84.0-90.5), and negative predictive values of 99.7% (95% CI, 98.2-99.9) for medical/surgical patients and 96.9% (95% CI, 89.3-99.6) for psychiatric patients.

Conclusions: A 4-question screening instrument, the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ), with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, can identify the risk for suicide in patients presenting to pediatric emergency departments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊最新文献
Changing the conversation regarding pediatric cholesterol screening: the rare disease paradigm. Prioritization of comparative effectiveness research topics in hospital pediatrics. Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ): a brief instrument for the pediatric emergency department. Safety of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine administered routinely to females. Parental influence on substance use in adolescent social networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1