Bernard Floccard, Etienne Hautin, Laurence Bouillet, Brigitte Coppere, Bernard Allaouchiche
{"title":"伊卡替特治疗遗传性I型和II型血管性水肿急性发作的潜在作用的循证综述。","authors":"Bernard Floccard, Etienne Hautin, Laurence Bouillet, Brigitte Coppere, Bernard Allaouchiche","doi":"10.2147/CE.S24743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Icatibant, a first-in-class B2 bradykinin receptor antagonist, appears to have a favorable efficacy and safety profile for the treatment of acute attacks of hereditary angioedema in adults.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To update the evidence and provide an overview of the available data on icatibant.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>Peer reviewed articles published and listed in Medline Search and published updated guidelines for the treatment of acute attacks in hereditary angioedema type I and II in adults were reviewed. The validity and quality of evidence were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Place in therapy: </strong>Clinical evidence for the treatment of acute hereditary angioedema attacks with icatibant is strong. Approximately 10% of the patients require a second dose. No serious adverse reactions have been reported. The only significant side effects consistently registered by 90% of patients are transient local pain, swelling, and erythema at the local injection site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subcutaneously administered 30 mg icatibant has been shown to be a safe and efficacious treatment in clinical trials. It is the only specific treatment authorized for self-administration by the subcutaneous route offering increased patient independence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10764,"journal":{"name":"Core Evidence","volume":"7 ","pages":"105-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CE.S24743","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evidence-based review of the potential role of icatibant in the treatment of acute attacks in hereditary angioedema type I and II.\",\"authors\":\"Bernard Floccard, Etienne Hautin, Laurence Bouillet, Brigitte Coppere, Bernard Allaouchiche\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CE.S24743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Icatibant, a first-in-class B2 bradykinin receptor antagonist, appears to have a favorable efficacy and safety profile for the treatment of acute attacks of hereditary angioedema in adults.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To update the evidence and provide an overview of the available data on icatibant.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>Peer reviewed articles published and listed in Medline Search and published updated guidelines for the treatment of acute attacks in hereditary angioedema type I and II in adults were reviewed. The validity and quality of evidence were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Place in therapy: </strong>Clinical evidence for the treatment of acute hereditary angioedema attacks with icatibant is strong. Approximately 10% of the patients require a second dose. No serious adverse reactions have been reported. The only significant side effects consistently registered by 90% of patients are transient local pain, swelling, and erythema at the local injection site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subcutaneously administered 30 mg icatibant has been shown to be a safe and efficacious treatment in clinical trials. It is the only specific treatment authorized for self-administration by the subcutaneous route offering increased patient independence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Core Evidence\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"105-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CE.S24743\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Core Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CE.S24743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/9/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Core Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CE.S24743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An evidence-based review of the potential role of icatibant in the treatment of acute attacks in hereditary angioedema type I and II.
Introduction: Icatibant, a first-in-class B2 bradykinin receptor antagonist, appears to have a favorable efficacy and safety profile for the treatment of acute attacks of hereditary angioedema in adults.
Aims: To update the evidence and provide an overview of the available data on icatibant.
Evidence review: Peer reviewed articles published and listed in Medline Search and published updated guidelines for the treatment of acute attacks in hereditary angioedema type I and II in adults were reviewed. The validity and quality of evidence were evaluated.
Place in therapy: Clinical evidence for the treatment of acute hereditary angioedema attacks with icatibant is strong. Approximately 10% of the patients require a second dose. No serious adverse reactions have been reported. The only significant side effects consistently registered by 90% of patients are transient local pain, swelling, and erythema at the local injection site.
Conclusion: Subcutaneously administered 30 mg icatibant has been shown to be a safe and efficacious treatment in clinical trials. It is the only specific treatment authorized for self-administration by the subcutaneous route offering increased patient independence.
期刊介绍:
Core Evidence evaluates the evidence underlying the potential place in therapy of drugs throughout their development lifecycle from preclinical to postlaunch. The focus of each review is to evaluate the case for a new drug or class in outcome terms in specific indications and patient groups The emerging evidence on new drugs is reviewed at key stages of development and evaluated against unmet needs