初始和长期剂量小于5mg /天的强的松治疗类风湿关节炎有效——使用患者自我报告多维健康评估问卷(MDHAQ)进行记录

Theodore Pincus, Isabel Castrejón
{"title":"初始和长期剂量小于5mg /天的强的松治疗类风湿关节炎有效——使用患者自我报告多维健康评估问卷(MDHAQ)进行记录","authors":"Theodore Pincus,&nbsp;Isabel Castrejón","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of initial and long-term prednisone < 5 mg/ day in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by one academic rheumatologist over 25 years from 1980 to 2004 is summarized. Patient responses were assessed using a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), completed by all patients at all visits in the infrastructure of care. A database was maintained of all visits, which included medications and scores for physical function, pain, patient global estimate of status, and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3), an index of these 3 measures. Prednisone doses were higher in patients with more severe MDHAQ/RAPID3 scores, as expected, although formal criteria were not used to determine the initial dose. Similar improvements were seen in clinical status over 12 months in patients treated with < 5 vs ≥ 5 mg/day prednisone and maintained for > 8 years. Adverse effects were primarily bruising and skin-thinning; levels of hypertension, diabetes, and cataracts were not higher than expected, including in 148 patients monitored over > 4 years, 75 over > 8 years. Prednisone at initial and long-term doses of < 5 mg/day appears acceptable and effective for many patients with RA at this time, although further clinical trials and long-term observational studies are needed to optimize treatment of patients with RA with low-dose prednisone. The data also illustrate that MDHAQ scores in usual clinical care can be used to document results of therapy over long periods with no extra work for the physician.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective initial and long-term prednisone in doses of less than 5 mg/day to treat rheumatoid arthritis--documentation using a patient self-report Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ).\",\"authors\":\"Theodore Pincus,&nbsp;Isabel Castrejón\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The efficacy of initial and long-term prednisone < 5 mg/ day in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by one academic rheumatologist over 25 years from 1980 to 2004 is summarized. Patient responses were assessed using a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), completed by all patients at all visits in the infrastructure of care. A database was maintained of all visits, which included medications and scores for physical function, pain, patient global estimate of status, and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3), an index of these 3 measures. Prednisone doses were higher in patients with more severe MDHAQ/RAPID3 scores, as expected, although formal criteria were not used to determine the initial dose. Similar improvements were seen in clinical status over 12 months in patients treated with < 5 vs ≥ 5 mg/day prednisone and maintained for > 8 years. Adverse effects were primarily bruising and skin-thinning; levels of hypertension, diabetes, and cataracts were not higher than expected, including in 148 patients monitored over > 4 years, 75 over > 8 years. Prednisone at initial and long-term doses of < 5 mg/day appears acceptable and effective for many patients with RA at this time, although further clinical trials and long-term observational studies are needed to optimize treatment of patients with RA with low-dose prednisone. The data also illustrate that MDHAQ scores in usual clinical care can be used to document results of therapy over long periods with no extra work for the physician.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从1980年到2004年,一位学术风湿病学家总结了原发性和长期强的松< 5mg /天治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的疗效。采用多维健康评估问卷(MDHAQ)对患者的反应进行评估,该问卷由所有患者在医疗基础设施的所有访问中完成。维护所有就诊的数据库,其中包括药物和身体功能、疼痛评分、患者总体状态估计以及患者指数数据(RAPID3)的常规评估,RAPID3是这3项指标的指标。正如预期的那样,MDHAQ/RAPID3评分越重的患者泼尼松剂量越高,尽管没有使用正式的标准来确定初始剂量。在接受< 5 mg/天与≥5 mg/天强的松治疗的患者中,临床状态在12个月内也出现了类似的改善,并维持了> 8年。不良反应主要是瘀伤和皮肤变薄;高血压、糖尿病和白内障的水平没有高于预期,包括148名监测超过4年的患者,75名监测超过8年的患者。目前,对于许多RA患者来说,初始和长期剂量< 5mg /天的强的松似乎是可以接受和有效的,尽管需要进一步的临床试验和长期观察研究来优化低剂量强的松治疗RA患者。数据还表明,在常规临床护理中,MDHAQ评分可以用来记录长期治疗的结果,而不需要医生额外的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effective initial and long-term prednisone in doses of less than 5 mg/day to treat rheumatoid arthritis--documentation using a patient self-report Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ).

The efficacy of initial and long-term prednisone < 5 mg/ day in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by one academic rheumatologist over 25 years from 1980 to 2004 is summarized. Patient responses were assessed using a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), completed by all patients at all visits in the infrastructure of care. A database was maintained of all visits, which included medications and scores for physical function, pain, patient global estimate of status, and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3), an index of these 3 measures. Prednisone doses were higher in patients with more severe MDHAQ/RAPID3 scores, as expected, although formal criteria were not used to determine the initial dose. Similar improvements were seen in clinical status over 12 months in patients treated with < 5 vs ≥ 5 mg/day prednisone and maintained for > 8 years. Adverse effects were primarily bruising and skin-thinning; levels of hypertension, diabetes, and cataracts were not higher than expected, including in 148 patients monitored over > 4 years, 75 over > 8 years. Prednisone at initial and long-term doses of < 5 mg/day appears acceptable and effective for many patients with RA at this time, although further clinical trials and long-term observational studies are needed to optimize treatment of patients with RA with low-dose prednisone. The data also illustrate that MDHAQ scores in usual clinical care can be used to document results of therapy over long periods with no extra work for the physician.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
B-cell therapies for rheumatoid arthritis. Focal neurological deficits due to a contrast enhancing lesion in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: case report and review of literature. Anterior spinal cord syndrome in a patient with Behçet's disease. Symptomatic babesiosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: report of a case and review of the literature. Pregnancy in a patient with Wegener's granulomatosis: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1