针对成人骨密度的运动干预的退出和依从性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Osteoporosis Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-06-03 DOI:10.1155/2013/250423
George A Kelley, Kristi S Kelley
{"title":"针对成人骨密度的运动干预的退出和依从性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"George A Kelley,&nbsp;Kristi S Kelley","doi":"10.1155/2013/250423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Dropouts and compliance to exercise interventions targeting bone mineral density (BMD) in adults are not well established. The purpose of this study was to address that gap. Methods. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled exercise intervention trials in adults ≥18 years of age. The primary outcomes were dropouts in the exercise and control groups as well as compliance to the exercise interventions. A random-effects model was used to pool results. Moderator analyses were conducted using mixed-effects ANOVA-like models and metaregression. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results. Thirty-six studies representing 3,297 participants (1,855 exercise, 1,442 control) were included. Dropout rates in the exercise and control groups averaged 20.9% (95% CI 16.7%-25.9%) and 15.9% (11.8%-21.1%) while compliance to exercise was 76.3% (71.7%-80.3%). For both exercise and control groups, greater dropout rates were associated with studies conducted in the USA versus other countries, females versus males, premenopausal versus postmenopausal women, younger versus older participants, longer studies (controls only), and high- versus moderate-intensity training (exercisers only). Greater compliance to exercise was associated with being female, home- or facility-based exercise versus both, and shorter studies. Conclusion. These findings provide important information for researchers and practitioners with respect to exercise programs targeting BMD in adults. </p>","PeriodicalId":45384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteoporosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/250423","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dropouts and compliance in exercise interventions targeting bone mineral density in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"George A Kelley,&nbsp;Kristi S Kelley\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/250423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background. Dropouts and compliance to exercise interventions targeting bone mineral density (BMD) in adults are not well established. The purpose of this study was to address that gap. Methods. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled exercise intervention trials in adults ≥18 years of age. The primary outcomes were dropouts in the exercise and control groups as well as compliance to the exercise interventions. A random-effects model was used to pool results. Moderator analyses were conducted using mixed-effects ANOVA-like models and metaregression. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results. Thirty-six studies representing 3,297 participants (1,855 exercise, 1,442 control) were included. Dropout rates in the exercise and control groups averaged 20.9% (95% CI 16.7%-25.9%) and 15.9% (11.8%-21.1%) while compliance to exercise was 76.3% (71.7%-80.3%). For both exercise and control groups, greater dropout rates were associated with studies conducted in the USA versus other countries, females versus males, premenopausal versus postmenopausal women, younger versus older participants, longer studies (controls only), and high- versus moderate-intensity training (exercisers only). Greater compliance to exercise was associated with being female, home- or facility-based exercise versus both, and shorter studies. Conclusion. These findings provide important information for researchers and practitioners with respect to exercise programs targeting BMD in adults. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteoporosis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/250423\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteoporosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/250423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/250423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

背景。在成人中,针对骨密度(BMD)的运动干预的退出和依从性尚未得到很好的证实。这项研究的目的是解决这一差距。方法。≥18岁成人随机对照运动干预试验的meta分析。主要结果是运动组和对照组的退出以及对运动干预的依从性。随机效应模型用于汇总结果。使用混合效应anova样模型和元回归进行调节分析。P≤0.05,差异有统计学意义。结果。共纳入36项研究,3297名参与者(1855名运动参与者,1442名对照组)。运动组和对照组的辍学率平均为20.9% (95% CI 16.7%-25.9%)和15.9%(11.8%-21.1%),而运动依从性为76.3%(71.7%-80.3%)。对于运动组和对照组,在美国与其他国家、女性与男性、绝经前与绝经后妇女、年轻与年长参与者、更长的研究时间(仅限对照组)、高强度与中等强度训练(仅限锻炼者)进行的研究中,更高的辍学率相关。女性对锻炼的依从性更高,在家或在设施进行锻炼与两者相比,研究时间更短。结论。这些发现为研究人员和从业人员提供了针对成人骨密度的锻炼计划的重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dropouts and compliance in exercise interventions targeting bone mineral density in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background. Dropouts and compliance to exercise interventions targeting bone mineral density (BMD) in adults are not well established. The purpose of this study was to address that gap. Methods. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled exercise intervention trials in adults ≥18 years of age. The primary outcomes were dropouts in the exercise and control groups as well as compliance to the exercise interventions. A random-effects model was used to pool results. Moderator analyses were conducted using mixed-effects ANOVA-like models and metaregression. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results. Thirty-six studies representing 3,297 participants (1,855 exercise, 1,442 control) were included. Dropout rates in the exercise and control groups averaged 20.9% (95% CI 16.7%-25.9%) and 15.9% (11.8%-21.1%) while compliance to exercise was 76.3% (71.7%-80.3%). For both exercise and control groups, greater dropout rates were associated with studies conducted in the USA versus other countries, females versus males, premenopausal versus postmenopausal women, younger versus older participants, longer studies (controls only), and high- versus moderate-intensity training (exercisers only). Greater compliance to exercise was associated with being female, home- or facility-based exercise versus both, and shorter studies. Conclusion. These findings provide important information for researchers and practitioners with respect to exercise programs targeting BMD in adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Changes in Testing and Treatment Methods in Osteoporosis Care The Effects of Switch Therapy in Osteoporosis Treatment after Romosozumab after Comparing with Prior Treatment Quantitative MR Analysis of Changes in the Radius Bone Marrow in Osteoporosis. Skeletal Manifestations, Bone Pain, and BMD Changes in Albanian Type 1 Gaucher Patients Treated with Taliglucerase Alfa Osteoporosis Screening Disparities among Ethnic and Racial Minorities: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1