紧咬牙时下颌和颈部肌肉的神经肌肉相互作用。

Nikolaos Nikitas Giannakopoulos, Daniel Hellmann, Marc Schmitter, Bastian Krüger, Thomas Hauser, Hans J Schindler
{"title":"紧咬牙时下颌和颈部肌肉的神经肌肉相互作用。","authors":"Nikolaos Nikitas Giannakopoulos,&nbsp;Daniel Hellmann,&nbsp;Marc Schmitter,&nbsp;Bastian Krüger,&nbsp;Thomas Hauser,&nbsp;Hans J Schindler","doi":"10.11607/jop.915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To test the hypothesis that jaw muscles and specific neck muscles, ie, levator scapulae, trapezius, sternocleidomastoideus, and splenius capitis, co-contract at the different submaximum bite forces usually generated during jaw clenching and tooth grinding, and for different bite force directions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bite-force transducers that measured all three spatial force components were incorporated in 11 healthy subjects. The test persons developed feedback-controlled submaximum bite forces in a variety of bite-force directions. The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the levator scapulae, splenius capitis, and trapezius muscles was recorded, at the level of the fifth cervical vertebra, by use of intramuscular wire electrodes. The activity of the sternocleidomastoideus and masseter muscles was recorded by surface electrodes. For normalization of the EMG data, maximum-effort tasks of the neck muscles were conducted in eight different loading directions by means of a special force-transducer system. Differences between neck-muscle activity during chewing, maximum biting in intercuspation, and the force-controlled motor tasks were compared with the baseline activity of the various muscles by one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results confirmed the hypothesis. Co-contractions of the neck muscles in the range of 3% to 10% of maximum voluntary contraction were observed. Significant (P < .05) activity differences were recorded as a result of the different force levels and force directions exerted by the jaw muscles. Long-lasting action potential trains of single motor units triggered by jaw clenching tasks were also detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support the assumption of a relationship between jaw clenching and the neck muscle activity investigated. The low level of co-contraction activity, however, requires further study to elucidate possible pathophysiological interactions at the level of single motor units.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 1","pages":"61-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.915","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromuscular interaction of jaw and neck muscles during jaw clenching.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaos Nikitas Giannakopoulos,&nbsp;Daniel Hellmann,&nbsp;Marc Schmitter,&nbsp;Bastian Krüger,&nbsp;Thomas Hauser,&nbsp;Hans J Schindler\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jop.915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To test the hypothesis that jaw muscles and specific neck muscles, ie, levator scapulae, trapezius, sternocleidomastoideus, and splenius capitis, co-contract at the different submaximum bite forces usually generated during jaw clenching and tooth grinding, and for different bite force directions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bite-force transducers that measured all three spatial force components were incorporated in 11 healthy subjects. The test persons developed feedback-controlled submaximum bite forces in a variety of bite-force directions. The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the levator scapulae, splenius capitis, and trapezius muscles was recorded, at the level of the fifth cervical vertebra, by use of intramuscular wire electrodes. The activity of the sternocleidomastoideus and masseter muscles was recorded by surface electrodes. For normalization of the EMG data, maximum-effort tasks of the neck muscles were conducted in eight different loading directions by means of a special force-transducer system. Differences between neck-muscle activity during chewing, maximum biting in intercuspation, and the force-controlled motor tasks were compared with the baseline activity of the various muscles by one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results confirmed the hypothesis. Co-contractions of the neck muscles in the range of 3% to 10% of maximum voluntary contraction were observed. Significant (P < .05) activity differences were recorded as a result of the different force levels and force directions exerted by the jaw muscles. Long-lasting action potential trains of single motor units triggered by jaw clenching tasks were also detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support the assumption of a relationship between jaw clenching and the neck muscle activity investigated. The low level of co-contraction activity, however, requires further study to elucidate possible pathophysiological interactions at the level of single motor units.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orofacial pain\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"61-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.915\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orofacial pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.915\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

目的:验证颌骨肌肉与颈部特定肌肉(肩胛提肌、斜方肌、胸锁乳突肌、头脾肌)在咬合和磨牙时通常产生的不同次极大咬合力及不同咬合力方向下共同收缩的假设。方法:在11名健康受试者身上植入可测量所有三种空间力分量的咬合力传感器。试验人员在各种咬合力方向上开发了反馈控制的次最大咬合力。利用肌内丝电极记录了在第五颈椎水平的肩胛提肌、头脾肌和斜方肌的肌电图活动。用表面电极记录胸锁乳突肌和咬肌的活动。为了对肌电数据进行归一化,利用一种特殊的力传感器系统在8个不同的加载方向上进行了颈部肌肉的最大努力任务。通过单向重复测量方差分析,将咀嚼时颈部肌肉活动、间歇时最大咬痕和力控运动任务之间的差异与各种肌肉的基线活动进行比较。结果:结果证实了假设。观察到颈部肌肉在最大自主收缩的3%至10%范围内的共同收缩。由于下颚肌肉施加的力水平和力方向不同,记录了显著(P < 0.05)的活动差异。此外,还发现了由咬牙任务触发的单个运动单元的长时间动作电位序列。结论:研究结果支持了下颌握紧和颈部肌肉活动之间关系的假设。然而,低水平的共收缩活动需要进一步的研究来阐明在单个运动单元水平上可能的病理生理相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuromuscular interaction of jaw and neck muscles during jaw clenching.

Aims: To test the hypothesis that jaw muscles and specific neck muscles, ie, levator scapulae, trapezius, sternocleidomastoideus, and splenius capitis, co-contract at the different submaximum bite forces usually generated during jaw clenching and tooth grinding, and for different bite force directions.

Methods: Bite-force transducers that measured all three spatial force components were incorporated in 11 healthy subjects. The test persons developed feedback-controlled submaximum bite forces in a variety of bite-force directions. The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the levator scapulae, splenius capitis, and trapezius muscles was recorded, at the level of the fifth cervical vertebra, by use of intramuscular wire electrodes. The activity of the sternocleidomastoideus and masseter muscles was recorded by surface electrodes. For normalization of the EMG data, maximum-effort tasks of the neck muscles were conducted in eight different loading directions by means of a special force-transducer system. Differences between neck-muscle activity during chewing, maximum biting in intercuspation, and the force-controlled motor tasks were compared with the baseline activity of the various muscles by one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.

Results: The results confirmed the hypothesis. Co-contractions of the neck muscles in the range of 3% to 10% of maximum voluntary contraction were observed. Significant (P < .05) activity differences were recorded as a result of the different force levels and force directions exerted by the jaw muscles. Long-lasting action potential trains of single motor units triggered by jaw clenching tasks were also detected.

Conclusion: The findings support the assumption of a relationship between jaw clenching and the neck muscle activity investigated. The low level of co-contraction activity, however, requires further study to elucidate possible pathophysiological interactions at the level of single motor units.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Way forward Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating intraoral orthopedic appliances for temporomandibular disorders. Neuroplasticity in the adaptation to prosthodontic treatment. Temporomandibular disorder pain after whiplash trauma: a systematic review. Why seek treatment for temporomandibular disorder pain complaints? A study based on semi-structured interviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1