清醒脑刺激期间术中ECoG的频率和时间-频率分析。

Frontiers in neuroengineering Pub Date : 2013-02-25 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneng.2013.00001
Emanuela Formaggio, Silvia F Storti, Vincenzo Tramontano, Agnese Casarin, Alessandra Bertoldo, Antonio Fiaschi, Andrea Talacchi, Francesco Sala, Gianna M Toffolo, Paolo Manganotti
{"title":"清醒脑刺激期间术中ECoG的频率和时间-频率分析。","authors":"Emanuela Formaggio,&nbsp;Silvia F Storti,&nbsp;Vincenzo Tramontano,&nbsp;Agnese Casarin,&nbsp;Alessandra Bertoldo,&nbsp;Antonio Fiaschi,&nbsp;Andrea Talacchi,&nbsp;Francesco Sala,&nbsp;Gianna M Toffolo,&nbsp;Paolo Manganotti","doi":"10.3389/fneng.2013.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electrocortical stimulation remains the standard for functional brain mapping of eloquent areas to prevent postoperative functional deficits. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the short-train technique (monopolar stimulation) and Penfield's technique (bipolar stimulation) would induce different effects on brain oscillatory activity in awake patients, as quantified by electrocorticography (ECoG). The study population was seven patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. Intraoperative bipolar and monopolar electrical stimulation for cortical mapping was performed during awake surgery. ECoG was recorded using 1 × 8 electrode strip. Spectral estimation was calculated using a parametric approach based on an autoregressive model. Wavelet-based time-frequency analysis was then applied to evaluate the temporal evolution of brain oscillatory activity. Both monopolar and bipolar stimulation produced an increment in delta and a decrease in beta powers for the motor and the sensory channels. These phenomena lasted about 4 s. Comparison between monopolar and bipolar stimulation showed no significant difference in brain activity. Given the importance of quantitative signal analysis for evaluating response accuracy, ECoG recording during electrical stimulation is necessary to characterize the dynamic processes underlying changes in cortical responses in vivo. This study is a preliminary approach to the quantitative analysis of post-stimulation ECoG signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":73093,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroengineering","volume":"6 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fneng.2013.00001","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and time-frequency analysis of intraoperative ECoG during awake brain stimulation.\",\"authors\":\"Emanuela Formaggio,&nbsp;Silvia F Storti,&nbsp;Vincenzo Tramontano,&nbsp;Agnese Casarin,&nbsp;Alessandra Bertoldo,&nbsp;Antonio Fiaschi,&nbsp;Andrea Talacchi,&nbsp;Francesco Sala,&nbsp;Gianna M Toffolo,&nbsp;Paolo Manganotti\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneng.2013.00001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Electrocortical stimulation remains the standard for functional brain mapping of eloquent areas to prevent postoperative functional deficits. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the short-train technique (monopolar stimulation) and Penfield's technique (bipolar stimulation) would induce different effects on brain oscillatory activity in awake patients, as quantified by electrocorticography (ECoG). The study population was seven patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. Intraoperative bipolar and monopolar electrical stimulation for cortical mapping was performed during awake surgery. ECoG was recorded using 1 × 8 electrode strip. Spectral estimation was calculated using a parametric approach based on an autoregressive model. Wavelet-based time-frequency analysis was then applied to evaluate the temporal evolution of brain oscillatory activity. Both monopolar and bipolar stimulation produced an increment in delta and a decrease in beta powers for the motor and the sensory channels. These phenomena lasted about 4 s. Comparison between monopolar and bipolar stimulation showed no significant difference in brain activity. Given the importance of quantitative signal analysis for evaluating response accuracy, ECoG recording during electrical stimulation is necessary to characterize the dynamic processes underlying changes in cortical responses in vivo. This study is a preliminary approach to the quantitative analysis of post-stimulation ECoG signals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in neuroengineering\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fneng.2013.00001\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in neuroengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2013.00001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2013.00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

皮层电刺激仍然是大脑功能定位有说服力区域的标准,以防止术后功能缺陷。本研究的目的是研究短训练技术(单极刺激)和Penfield技术(双极刺激)是否会对清醒患者的大脑振荡活动产生不同的影响,如皮层电图(ECoG)所量化的。研究人群为7名接受脑肿瘤手术的患者。术中双极和单极电刺激用于皮层标测是在清醒手术期间进行的。使用1×8电极条记录ECoG。使用基于自回归模型的参数方法计算谱估计。然后应用基于小波的时频分析来评估大脑振荡活动的时间演变。单极和双极刺激都会使运动和感觉通道的δ功率增加,β功率减少。这些现象持续了大约4秒。单极和双极刺激之间的比较表明,大脑活动没有显著差异。鉴于定量信号分析对评估反应准确性的重要性,电刺激期间的ECoG记录对于表征体内皮层反应变化的动态过程是必要的。本研究是对刺激后ECoG信号进行定量分析的初步方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frequency and time-frequency analysis of intraoperative ECoG during awake brain stimulation.

Electrocortical stimulation remains the standard for functional brain mapping of eloquent areas to prevent postoperative functional deficits. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the short-train technique (monopolar stimulation) and Penfield's technique (bipolar stimulation) would induce different effects on brain oscillatory activity in awake patients, as quantified by electrocorticography (ECoG). The study population was seven patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. Intraoperative bipolar and monopolar electrical stimulation for cortical mapping was performed during awake surgery. ECoG was recorded using 1 × 8 electrode strip. Spectral estimation was calculated using a parametric approach based on an autoregressive model. Wavelet-based time-frequency analysis was then applied to evaluate the temporal evolution of brain oscillatory activity. Both monopolar and bipolar stimulation produced an increment in delta and a decrease in beta powers for the motor and the sensory channels. These phenomena lasted about 4 s. Comparison between monopolar and bipolar stimulation showed no significant difference in brain activity. Given the importance of quantitative signal analysis for evaluating response accuracy, ECoG recording during electrical stimulation is necessary to characterize the dynamic processes underlying changes in cortical responses in vivo. This study is a preliminary approach to the quantitative analysis of post-stimulation ECoG signals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In vivo comparison of the charge densities required to evoke motor responses using novel annular penetrating microelectrodes. SET: a pupil detection method using sinusoidal approximation. The chronic challenge-new vistas on long-term multisite contacts to the central nervous system. High frequency switched-mode stimulation can evoke post synaptic responses in cerebellar principal neurons. NeuroPG: open source software for optical pattern generation and data acquisition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1