生命的终结,生命的终结:一个人类学的观点。

The Journal of IMA Pub Date : 2011-12-01 DOI:10.5915/43-7037
Daniel Martin Varisco
{"title":"生命的终结,生命的终结:一个人类学的观点。","authors":"Daniel Martin Varisco","doi":"10.5915/43-7037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>All known human societies have a worldview that deserves to be called religion; all religions must explain death. Anthropologists study the diversity of religious systems, present and past, in order to understand what is common to humanity. Rather than starting from the view of a particular revelation or set of doctrines, the anthropologist tries to step outside his or her own subjective worldview and identify patterns in the evolution of human thinking about the reality of physical death. Are humans the only animals that are conscious of death, or do we share sentiments observable in our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees? At what point in history did the concept of an afterlife, life in some spiritual sense after physical death, appear? Is the religious explanation of life and death a mere reflection of a communal social fact, as the sociologist Emil Durkheim suggested, or a shared psychological trait, as more recent scholars assert? Can and should the modern scientist make a definitive statement about the finality of death and human consciousness?</p>","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"203-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5915/43-7037","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The end of life, the ends of life: an anthropological view.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Martin Varisco\",\"doi\":\"10.5915/43-7037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>All known human societies have a worldview that deserves to be called religion; all religions must explain death. Anthropologists study the diversity of religious systems, present and past, in order to understand what is common to humanity. Rather than starting from the view of a particular revelation or set of doctrines, the anthropologist tries to step outside his or her own subjective worldview and identify patterns in the evolution of human thinking about the reality of physical death. Are humans the only animals that are conscious of death, or do we share sentiments observable in our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees? At what point in history did the concept of an afterlife, life in some spiritual sense after physical death, appear? Is the religious explanation of life and death a mere reflection of a communal social fact, as the sociologist Emil Durkheim suggested, or a shared psychological trait, as more recent scholars assert? Can and should the modern scientist make a definitive statement about the finality of death and human consciousness?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of IMA\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"203-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5915/43-7037\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of IMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-7037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of IMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-7037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

所有已知的人类社会都有一种值得称为宗教的世界观;所有宗教都必须解释死亡。人类学家研究宗教系统的多样性,现在和过去,为了了解什么是人类的共同之处。人类学家不是从一个特定的启示或一套教义的观点出发,而是试图走出他或她自己的主观世界观,并确定人类对身体死亡现实的思考演变的模式。人类是唯一能意识到死亡的动物吗,还是我们和我们的近亲黑猩猩有同样的情感?在历史上什么时候出现了来世的概念,即肉体死亡后某种精神意义上的生命?是像社会学家埃米尔·迪尔凯姆(Emil Durkheim)所说的那样,对生死的宗教解释仅仅反映了一种共同的社会事实,还是像最近的学者所断言的那样,是一种共同的心理特征?现代科学家能够也应该对死亡和人类意识的终结做出明确的陈述吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The end of life, the ends of life: an anthropological view.

All known human societies have a worldview that deserves to be called religion; all religions must explain death. Anthropologists study the diversity of religious systems, present and past, in order to understand what is common to humanity. Rather than starting from the view of a particular revelation or set of doctrines, the anthropologist tries to step outside his or her own subjective worldview and identify patterns in the evolution of human thinking about the reality of physical death. Are humans the only animals that are conscious of death, or do we share sentiments observable in our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees? At what point in history did the concept of an afterlife, life in some spiritual sense after physical death, appear? Is the religious explanation of life and death a mere reflection of a communal social fact, as the sociologist Emil Durkheim suggested, or a shared psychological trait, as more recent scholars assert? Can and should the modern scientist make a definitive statement about the finality of death and human consciousness?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of breast cancer by vaccine: fact or fiction. Ethics of surrogacy: a comparative study of Western secular and islamic bioethics. Achalasia cardia in infants: report of two cases. A Pilot Trial of Jawarish Amla as Adjuvant to Anti-Tubercular Treatment Drugs for Control of Adverse Reactions in DOTS Regime in Pulmonary TB. American Muslim Women: Negotiating Race, Class, and Gender Within the Ummah by Jamillah Karim
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1