有同情心的护理。

Stephen G Post, Julie Byrne
{"title":"有同情心的护理。","authors":"Stephen G Post, Julie Byrne","doi":"10.5915/43-3-9219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What does Islam have to offer health-care ethics that cannot be found elsewhere? I do not mean to suggest that there is only one answer to this question, because there are many. However, I will focus on the elevated status of the patient as the recipient of compassionate care. Today, the primary medical ethical issue is no longer a quandary such as “Should we withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a 90-year-old man with dementia?” Such questions are, of course, important. However, the primary issue is that the medical profession is losing its soul to technology and dehumanized care in which patients feel overbiologized and depersonalized, nothing more than “the kidney in room 5.” I ask you here today, in the name of Allah the merciful and compassionate, to be the ones who provide leadership in solving this crisis in medical care. Historians of medical ethics and bioethics rightly begin with Hippocratic ethics (400-300 BCE). We are familiar with the Hippocratic Oath and its influence. One finds in the ancient Greeks and Romans absolutely no passionate concern for the patient. There is no sense that the Hippocratic physician should go out of his way to help a needy patient. The spirit of Greco-Roman medical ethics is more or less casual with regard to the patient’s good. One has no image of the physician who goes out of his way or sacrifices ease in order to respond to the patient in need. In fact, for all its strengths, the Hippocratic ethos excludes from care slaves, poor people, and dying patients. Certainly the oath is clear in prohibiting the use of a deadly drug or abortifacient. It affirms confidentiality and “do no harm” and has many other strengths. But that passion for the patient in need, no matter how inconvenient, is simply not part of the ethos. The Hippocratic tradition is elitist, rather than devoted to patients in the spirit of equal regard. It really operates at the level of medicine as a career (careo) rather than anything deeper. There is no real call to serve. Then comes the great period of the Judeo, Christian, and Islamic traditions (est. 400 to 1750 CE). Here the physician is no longer casual but rather called by God to heal the sick regardless of their circumstances, degree of illness, or ability to pay. The Islamic Code of Medical Ethics of 1981, ratified by the First International Conference on Islamic Medicine and endorsed by many Islamic countries, vividly articulates this depth of calling to serve the needy. Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219 Video DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219V Compassionate Care Panel Discussion","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"148-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/59/jima-43-3-9219.PMC3516108.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compassionate care.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen G Post, Julie Byrne\",\"doi\":\"10.5915/43-3-9219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What does Islam have to offer health-care ethics that cannot be found elsewhere? I do not mean to suggest that there is only one answer to this question, because there are many. However, I will focus on the elevated status of the patient as the recipient of compassionate care. Today, the primary medical ethical issue is no longer a quandary such as “Should we withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a 90-year-old man with dementia?” Such questions are, of course, important. However, the primary issue is that the medical profession is losing its soul to technology and dehumanized care in which patients feel overbiologized and depersonalized, nothing more than “the kidney in room 5.” I ask you here today, in the name of Allah the merciful and compassionate, to be the ones who provide leadership in solving this crisis in medical care. Historians of medical ethics and bioethics rightly begin with Hippocratic ethics (400-300 BCE). We are familiar with the Hippocratic Oath and its influence. One finds in the ancient Greeks and Romans absolutely no passionate concern for the patient. There is no sense that the Hippocratic physician should go out of his way to help a needy patient. The spirit of Greco-Roman medical ethics is more or less casual with regard to the patient’s good. One has no image of the physician who goes out of his way or sacrifices ease in order to respond to the patient in need. In fact, for all its strengths, the Hippocratic ethos excludes from care slaves, poor people, and dying patients. Certainly the oath is clear in prohibiting the use of a deadly drug or abortifacient. It affirms confidentiality and “do no harm” and has many other strengths. But that passion for the patient in need, no matter how inconvenient, is simply not part of the ethos. The Hippocratic tradition is elitist, rather than devoted to patients in the spirit of equal regard. It really operates at the level of medicine as a career (careo) rather than anything deeper. There is no real call to serve. Then comes the great period of the Judeo, Christian, and Islamic traditions (est. 400 to 1750 CE). Here the physician is no longer casual but rather called by God to heal the sick regardless of their circumstances, degree of illness, or ability to pay. The Islamic Code of Medical Ethics of 1981, ratified by the First International Conference on Islamic Medicine and endorsed by many Islamic countries, vividly articulates this depth of calling to serve the needy. Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219 Video DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219V Compassionate Care Panel Discussion\",\"PeriodicalId\":89859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of IMA\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"148-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/59/jima-43-3-9219.PMC3516108.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of IMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of IMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compassionate care.
What does Islam have to offer health-care ethics that cannot be found elsewhere? I do not mean to suggest that there is only one answer to this question, because there are many. However, I will focus on the elevated status of the patient as the recipient of compassionate care. Today, the primary medical ethical issue is no longer a quandary such as “Should we withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a 90-year-old man with dementia?” Such questions are, of course, important. However, the primary issue is that the medical profession is losing its soul to technology and dehumanized care in which patients feel overbiologized and depersonalized, nothing more than “the kidney in room 5.” I ask you here today, in the name of Allah the merciful and compassionate, to be the ones who provide leadership in solving this crisis in medical care. Historians of medical ethics and bioethics rightly begin with Hippocratic ethics (400-300 BCE). We are familiar with the Hippocratic Oath and its influence. One finds in the ancient Greeks and Romans absolutely no passionate concern for the patient. There is no sense that the Hippocratic physician should go out of his way to help a needy patient. The spirit of Greco-Roman medical ethics is more or less casual with regard to the patient’s good. One has no image of the physician who goes out of his way or sacrifices ease in order to respond to the patient in need. In fact, for all its strengths, the Hippocratic ethos excludes from care slaves, poor people, and dying patients. Certainly the oath is clear in prohibiting the use of a deadly drug or abortifacient. It affirms confidentiality and “do no harm” and has many other strengths. But that passion for the patient in need, no matter how inconvenient, is simply not part of the ethos. The Hippocratic tradition is elitist, rather than devoted to patients in the spirit of equal regard. It really operates at the level of medicine as a career (careo) rather than anything deeper. There is no real call to serve. Then comes the great period of the Judeo, Christian, and Islamic traditions (est. 400 to 1750 CE). Here the physician is no longer casual but rather called by God to heal the sick regardless of their circumstances, degree of illness, or ability to pay. The Islamic Code of Medical Ethics of 1981, ratified by the First International Conference on Islamic Medicine and endorsed by many Islamic countries, vividly articulates this depth of calling to serve the needy. Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219 Video DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219V Compassionate Care Panel Discussion
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of breast cancer by vaccine: fact or fiction. Ethics of surrogacy: a comparative study of Western secular and islamic bioethics. Achalasia cardia in infants: report of two cases. A Pilot Trial of Jawarish Amla as Adjuvant to Anti-Tubercular Treatment Drugs for Control of Adverse Reactions in DOTS Regime in Pulmonary TB. American Muslim Women: Negotiating Race, Class, and Gender Within the Ummah by Jamillah Karim
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1