罗格列酮对糖尿病、高血压患者炎症生物标志物和脂肪因子的影响。

Experimental & Clinical Cardiology Pub Date : 2012-01-01
Milan Gupta, Hwee Teoh, Mahesh Kajil, Michelle Tsigoulis, Adrian Quan, Manoela Fb Braga, Subodh Verma
{"title":"罗格列酮对糖尿病、高血压患者炎症生物标志物和脂肪因子的影响。","authors":"Milan Gupta,&nbsp;Hwee Teoh,&nbsp;Mahesh Kajil,&nbsp;Michelle Tsigoulis,&nbsp;Adrian Quan,&nbsp;Manoela Fb Braga,&nbsp;Subodh Verma","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of a 12-week treatment course of a rosiglitazone-based versus a metformin- or glyburide-based strategy on inflammatory biomarkers and adipokine levels in hypertensive, type 2 diabetes patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred three treatment-naive patients or patients on monotherapy with either metformin or glyburide, and a hemoglobin A1C (A1C) ≥7.5%, were randomly assigned to either rosiglitazone add-on (4 mg/day ± titration to 8 mg/day) or a combination of metformin (250 mg twice per day [BID] titrated to 500 BID if A1C ≥7.5% and ≤8.0%; 500 mg BID titrated to 1 g BID if A1C >8.0%) and glyburide (2.5 mg BID titrated to 5 mg BID if A1C ≥7.5% and ≤8.0%; 5 mg BID titrated to 10 mg BID if A1C >8.0%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rosiglitazone add-on produced significantly greater reductions in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (2.1 mg/L to 0.9 mg/L) and increases in adiponectin (8.7 mg/mL to 14.8 mg/mL) levels compared with metformin/glyburide (both P<0.005). At close-out, all patients had improved fasting plasma glucose and A1C levels (8.5% to 7.4% and 8.8% to 7.1% for rosiglitazone add-on and metformin-glyburide, respectively [P<0.001 for both arms]) relative to the corresponding baseline values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrated that in hypertensive, diabetic subjects, a rosiglitazone-based treatment strategy results in favourable changes in inflammatory biomarkers compared with metformin/glyburide.</p>","PeriodicalId":54377,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"191-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627273/pdf/ecc17191.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of rosiglitazone on inflammatory biomarkers and adipokines in diabetic, hypertensive patients.\",\"authors\":\"Milan Gupta,&nbsp;Hwee Teoh,&nbsp;Mahesh Kajil,&nbsp;Michelle Tsigoulis,&nbsp;Adrian Quan,&nbsp;Manoela Fb Braga,&nbsp;Subodh Verma\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of a 12-week treatment course of a rosiglitazone-based versus a metformin- or glyburide-based strategy on inflammatory biomarkers and adipokine levels in hypertensive, type 2 diabetes patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred three treatment-naive patients or patients on monotherapy with either metformin or glyburide, and a hemoglobin A1C (A1C) ≥7.5%, were randomly assigned to either rosiglitazone add-on (4 mg/day ± titration to 8 mg/day) or a combination of metformin (250 mg twice per day [BID] titrated to 500 BID if A1C ≥7.5% and ≤8.0%; 500 mg BID titrated to 1 g BID if A1C >8.0%) and glyburide (2.5 mg BID titrated to 5 mg BID if A1C ≥7.5% and ≤8.0%; 5 mg BID titrated to 10 mg BID if A1C >8.0%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rosiglitazone add-on produced significantly greater reductions in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (2.1 mg/L to 0.9 mg/L) and increases in adiponectin (8.7 mg/mL to 14.8 mg/mL) levels compared with metformin/glyburide (both P<0.005). At close-out, all patients had improved fasting plasma glucose and A1C levels (8.5% to 7.4% and 8.8% to 7.1% for rosiglitazone add-on and metformin-glyburide, respectively [P<0.001 for both arms]) relative to the corresponding baseline values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrated that in hypertensive, diabetic subjects, a rosiglitazone-based treatment strategy results in favourable changes in inflammatory biomarkers compared with metformin/glyburide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"191-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627273/pdf/ecc17191.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较基于罗格列酮的治疗与基于二甲双胍或格列本脲的治疗对高血压2型糖尿病患者炎症生物标志物和脂肪因子水平的影响。方法:103例初治患者或单用二甲双胍或格列本脲治疗且血红蛋白A1C≥7.5%的患者被随机分配到罗格列酮加药组(4mg /天±滴定至8mg /天)或二甲双胍联合用药组(250mg /天两次[BID],如果A1C≥7.5%≤8.0%,滴定至500 BID;如果A1C >8.0%, 500mg BID滴定至1g BID)和格列本脲(如果A1C≥7.5%且≤8.0%,2.5 mg BID滴定至5mg BID);如果A1C >8.0%,则5mg BID滴定至10mg BID)。结果:与二甲双胍/格列本脲相比,罗格列酮附加治疗显著降低了高敏感性c反应蛋白(2.1 mg/L至0.9 mg/L),并增加了脂联素(8.7 mg/mL至14.8 mg/mL)水平(两者均为pp2)。结论:目前的研究表明,在高血压、糖尿病受试者中,与二甲双胍/格列本脲相比,罗格列酮治疗策略导致炎症生物标志物的有利变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of rosiglitazone on inflammatory biomarkers and adipokines in diabetic, hypertensive patients.

Objective: To compare the effects of a 12-week treatment course of a rosiglitazone-based versus a metformin- or glyburide-based strategy on inflammatory biomarkers and adipokine levels in hypertensive, type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods: One hundred three treatment-naive patients or patients on monotherapy with either metformin or glyburide, and a hemoglobin A1C (A1C) ≥7.5%, were randomly assigned to either rosiglitazone add-on (4 mg/day ± titration to 8 mg/day) or a combination of metformin (250 mg twice per day [BID] titrated to 500 BID if A1C ≥7.5% and ≤8.0%; 500 mg BID titrated to 1 g BID if A1C >8.0%) and glyburide (2.5 mg BID titrated to 5 mg BID if A1C ≥7.5% and ≤8.0%; 5 mg BID titrated to 10 mg BID if A1C >8.0%).

Results: Rosiglitazone add-on produced significantly greater reductions in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (2.1 mg/L to 0.9 mg/L) and increases in adiponectin (8.7 mg/mL to 14.8 mg/mL) levels compared with metformin/glyburide (both P<0.005). At close-out, all patients had improved fasting plasma glucose and A1C levels (8.5% to 7.4% and 8.8% to 7.1% for rosiglitazone add-on and metformin-glyburide, respectively [P<0.001 for both arms]) relative to the corresponding baseline values.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that in hypertensive, diabetic subjects, a rosiglitazone-based treatment strategy results in favourable changes in inflammatory biomarkers compared with metformin/glyburide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental & Clinical Cardiology
Experimental & Clinical Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evidence-performance gap in primary care revisited in patients with diabetes Ischemic postconditioning decreases matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression during ischemia-reperfusion of myocardium in a rabbit model: A preliminary report. The effect of trans-resveratrol on platelet-neutrophil complex formation and neutrophil burst in hypercholesterolemic rats. A modified murine model for the study of reverse cardiac remodelling. Functions of cyclophilin A in atherosclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1