柑橘/茜草皮下注射与鼻喷雾剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎:疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。

ISRN allergy Pub Date : 2011-07-18 Print Date: 2011-01-01 DOI:10.5402/2011/836051
Erik W Baars, Miek Jong, Andreas F M Nierop, Inge Boers, Huub F J Savelkoul
{"title":"柑橘/茜草皮下注射与鼻喷雾剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎:疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。","authors":"Erik W Baars,&nbsp;Miek Jong,&nbsp;Andreas F M Nierop,&nbsp;Inge Boers,&nbsp;Huub F J Savelkoul","doi":"10.5402/2011/836051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Background. Clinical experiences in vitro and clinical studies have demonstrated the curative potency and safety of Citrus/Cydonia compositum in seasonal allergic rhinitis treatment. Objectives. To compare the efficacy and safety of two routes of administration (nasal spray versus subcutaneous injections).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Design. a national, randomised, comparative clinical trial with two parallel groups. Participants. 23 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Intervention. after a one- or two-week wash-out period, 23 patients were randomized, to a 6-week treatment period. Outcomes. immunological and symptom severity changes and safety. Immunologic outcome assessments were blinded to group assignment. 23 patients were randomized and from 22/23 patients (11 in each group) blood samples were analyzed before and after treatment. Conclusion. Both routes of administration demonstrate immunological and clinical effects, with larger inflammatory and innate immunological effects of the nasal spray route and larger allergen-specific clinical effects of the subcutaneous route, and are safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":89782,"journal":{"name":"ISRN allergy","volume":"2011 ","pages":"836051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3658594/pdf/","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citrus/Cydonia Compositum Subcutaneous Injections versus Nasal Spray for Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Efficacy and Safety.\",\"authors\":\"Erik W Baars,&nbsp;Miek Jong,&nbsp;Andreas F M Nierop,&nbsp;Inge Boers,&nbsp;Huub F J Savelkoul\",\"doi\":\"10.5402/2011/836051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Background. Clinical experiences in vitro and clinical studies have demonstrated the curative potency and safety of Citrus/Cydonia compositum in seasonal allergic rhinitis treatment. Objectives. To compare the efficacy and safety of two routes of administration (nasal spray versus subcutaneous injections).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Design. a national, randomised, comparative clinical trial with two parallel groups. Participants. 23 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Intervention. after a one- or two-week wash-out period, 23 patients were randomized, to a 6-week treatment period. Outcomes. immunological and symptom severity changes and safety. Immunologic outcome assessments were blinded to group assignment. 23 patients were randomized and from 22/23 patients (11 in each group) blood samples were analyzed before and after treatment. Conclusion. Both routes of administration demonstrate immunological and clinical effects, with larger inflammatory and innate immunological effects of the nasal spray route and larger allergen-specific clinical effects of the subcutaneous route, and are safe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN allergy\",\"volume\":\"2011 \",\"pages\":\"836051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3658594/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/836051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/836051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

未标记的:背景。体外和临床研究均证实了复方柑橘治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性。目标。比较两种给药途径(鼻喷剂和皮下注射)的有效性和安全性。方法:设计。一项有两个平行组的全国性、随机、比较临床试验。参与者:23例患者符合研究要求。干预。经过一到两周的洗脱期后,23名患者被随机分配到为期6周的治疗期。结果。免疫及症状严重程度变化及安全性。免疫结果评估采用盲法分组。23例患者随机抽取22/23例(每组11例)进行治疗前后血液样本分析。结论。两种给药途径均表现出免疫和临床效果,鼻腔喷雾剂的炎症和先天免疫效果更大,皮下给药途径的过敏原特异性临床效果更大,并且是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Citrus/Cydonia Compositum Subcutaneous Injections versus Nasal Spray for Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Efficacy and Safety.

Unlabelled: Background. Clinical experiences in vitro and clinical studies have demonstrated the curative potency and safety of Citrus/Cydonia compositum in seasonal allergic rhinitis treatment. Objectives. To compare the efficacy and safety of two routes of administration (nasal spray versus subcutaneous injections).

Methodology: Design. a national, randomised, comparative clinical trial with two parallel groups. Participants. 23 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Intervention. after a one- or two-week wash-out period, 23 patients were randomized, to a 6-week treatment period. Outcomes. immunological and symptom severity changes and safety. Immunologic outcome assessments were blinded to group assignment. 23 patients were randomized and from 22/23 patients (11 in each group) blood samples were analyzed before and after treatment. Conclusion. Both routes of administration demonstrate immunological and clinical effects, with larger inflammatory and innate immunological effects of the nasal spray route and larger allergen-specific clinical effects of the subcutaneous route, and are safe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Atopic dermatitis: natural history, diagnosis, and treatment. Female asthma has a negative effect on fertility: what is the connection? Respiratory allergies: a general overview of remedies, delivery systems, and the need to progress. Prevalence of Allergies among University Students: A Study from Ajman, United Arab Emirates. Complementary therapies in allergic rhinitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1