埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学医院血库采集的输血用血液的细菌学安全性。

ISRN Hematology Pub Date : 2013-06-20 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/308204
Hailegebriel Wondimu, Zelalem Addis, Feleke Moges, Yitayal Shiferaw
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学医院血库采集的输血用血液的细菌学安全性。","authors":"Hailegebriel Wondimu,&nbsp;Zelalem Addis,&nbsp;Feleke Moges,&nbsp;Yitayal Shiferaw","doi":"10.1155/2013/308204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Transfusion associated bacterial infection has remained more frequent with a sever risk of morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the bacteriological safety of blood collected for transfusion. Method. A cross-sectional study was conducted at University of Gondar hospital blood bank from December 2011 to June 2012. Bacterial isolation, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were done as per the standard procedure. Chi-square test and P value were used to assess associations between risk factors and the bacterial isolation rate. Results. Twenty-one (15.33%) blood units were found contaminated with bacteria, and 95.24% contamination was due to external sources. The commonly isolated bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase negative Staphylococci, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Streptococci species, Enterobacter species, and Citrobacter species. All of the bacteria isolated were 100% sensitive to Gentamicin, Chloramphenicol, Amoxicillin, and Doxycycline. Multiple antimicrobial resistances were observed in 66.7% of the isolates. Not using glove by phlebotomist, touching disinfected phlebotomy site and double puncture at the same hand or both hands of a donor were found to be risk factors for bacterial contamination. Conclusion. Bacterial contamination of blood to be transfused is a common problem in the hospital. So attention should be given to activities performed at the blood bank for safe transfusion practices. </p>","PeriodicalId":14727,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Hematology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"308204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/308204","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacteriological safety of blood collected for transfusion at university of gondar hospital blood bank, northwest ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Hailegebriel Wondimu,&nbsp;Zelalem Addis,&nbsp;Feleke Moges,&nbsp;Yitayal Shiferaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/308204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background. Transfusion associated bacterial infection has remained more frequent with a sever risk of morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the bacteriological safety of blood collected for transfusion. Method. A cross-sectional study was conducted at University of Gondar hospital blood bank from December 2011 to June 2012. Bacterial isolation, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were done as per the standard procedure. Chi-square test and P value were used to assess associations between risk factors and the bacterial isolation rate. Results. Twenty-one (15.33%) blood units were found contaminated with bacteria, and 95.24% contamination was due to external sources. The commonly isolated bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase negative Staphylococci, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Streptococci species, Enterobacter species, and Citrobacter species. All of the bacteria isolated were 100% sensitive to Gentamicin, Chloramphenicol, Amoxicillin, and Doxycycline. Multiple antimicrobial resistances were observed in 66.7% of the isolates. Not using glove by phlebotomist, touching disinfected phlebotomy site and double puncture at the same hand or both hands of a donor were found to be risk factors for bacterial contamination. Conclusion. Bacterial contamination of blood to be transfused is a common problem in the hospital. So attention should be given to activities performed at the blood bank for safe transfusion practices. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN Hematology\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"308204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/308204\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/308204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/308204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景。输血相关的细菌感染仍然更为频繁,具有严重的发病率和死亡率风险。本研究评估了收集用于输血的血液的细菌学安全性。方法。横断面研究于2011年12月至2012年6月在贡达尔大学医院血库进行。按照标准程序进行细菌分离、鉴定和抗菌药敏试验。采用卡方检验和P值评价危险因素与细菌分离率的关系。结果。细菌污染21个(15.33%)单位,外源污染95.24%。常见的分离细菌有金黄色葡萄球菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌、克雷伯氏菌、链球菌、肠杆菌和柠檬酸杆菌。所有分离的细菌对庆大霉素、氯霉素、阿莫西林和强力霉素均100%敏感。66.7%的菌株存在多重耐药。采血人员不戴手套、接触已消毒的采血部位、献血者用同一只手或双手进行两次穿刺是细菌污染的危险因素。结论。输血时血液被细菌污染是医院常见的问题。因此,应注意在血库开展的安全输血活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bacteriological safety of blood collected for transfusion at university of gondar hospital blood bank, northwest ethiopia.

Background. Transfusion associated bacterial infection has remained more frequent with a sever risk of morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the bacteriological safety of blood collected for transfusion. Method. A cross-sectional study was conducted at University of Gondar hospital blood bank from December 2011 to June 2012. Bacterial isolation, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were done as per the standard procedure. Chi-square test and P value were used to assess associations between risk factors and the bacterial isolation rate. Results. Twenty-one (15.33%) blood units were found contaminated with bacteria, and 95.24% contamination was due to external sources. The commonly isolated bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase negative Staphylococci, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Streptococci species, Enterobacter species, and Citrobacter species. All of the bacteria isolated were 100% sensitive to Gentamicin, Chloramphenicol, Amoxicillin, and Doxycycline. Multiple antimicrobial resistances were observed in 66.7% of the isolates. Not using glove by phlebotomist, touching disinfected phlebotomy site and double puncture at the same hand or both hands of a donor were found to be risk factors for bacterial contamination. Conclusion. Bacterial contamination of blood to be transfused is a common problem in the hospital. So attention should be given to activities performed at the blood bank for safe transfusion practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preventative effects of caffeic Acid phenyl ester on cadmium intoxication induced hematological and blood coagulation disturbances and hepatorenal damage in rats. Relevant aspects of centrifugation step in the preparation of platelet-rich plasma. Phagocytized neutrophil fragments in the bone marrow: a phenomenon most commonly associated with hodgkin lymphoma. Coexisting iron deficiency anemia and Beta thalassemia trait: effect of iron therapy on red cell parameters and hemoglobin subtypes. Prevalence of deletional alpha thalassemia and sickle gene in a tribal dominated malaria endemic area of eastern India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1