对与虐待儿童有关的瘀伤的系统回顾——我们学到了什么:回顾更新的概述

Sabine Maguire, Mala Mann
{"title":"对与虐待儿童有关的瘀伤的系统回顾——我们学到了什么:回顾更新的概述","authors":"Sabine Maguire,&nbsp;Mala Mann","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background:</h3>\n \n <p>Dogma has long prevailed regarding the ageing of bruises, and whether certain patterns of bruising are suggestive or diagnostic of child abuse.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives:</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted the first Systematic Reviews addressing these two issues, to determine the scientific basis for current clinical practice. There have been seven updates since 2004.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods:</h3>\n \n <p>An all language literature search was performed across 13 databases, 1951–2004, using &gt;60 key words, supplemented by ‘snowballing’ techniques. Quality standards included a novel confirmation of abuse scale. Updates used expanded key words, and a higher standard for confirmation of abuse.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results:</h3>\n \n <p>Of 1495 potential studies, only three met the inclusion criteria for ageing of bruises in 2004, confirming that it is inaccurate to do so with the naked eye. This was roundly rejected when first reported, generating a wave of new studies attempting to determine a scientifically valid method to age bruises, none of which are applicable in children yet. Regarding patterns of bruising that may be suggestive or diagnostic of abuse, we included 23 of 167 studies reviewed in 2004, although only 2 were comparative studies. Included studies noted that unintentional bruises occur predominantly on the front of the body, over bony prominences and their presence is directly correlated to the child's level of independent mobility. Bruising patterns in abused children, differed in location (most common site being face, neck, ear, head, trunk, buttocks, arms), and tended to be larger. Updates have included a further 14 studies, including bruising in disabled children, defining distinguishing patterns in severely injured abused and non-abused children, and importance of petechiae.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions:</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic Reviews of bruising challenged accepted wisdom regarding ageing of bruises, which had no scientific basis; stimulated higher quality research on patterns of bruises distinguishing abusive and non-abusive bruising patterns, and highlighted the benefits of regular updates of these reviews.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"255-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1909","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic reviews of bruising in relation to child abuse—what have we learnt: an overview of review updates\",\"authors\":\"Sabine Maguire,&nbsp;Mala Mann\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ebch.1909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background:</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dogma has long prevailed regarding the ageing of bruises, and whether certain patterns of bruising are suggestive or diagnostic of child abuse.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives:</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted the first Systematic Reviews addressing these two issues, to determine the scientific basis for current clinical practice. There have been seven updates since 2004.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods:</h3>\\n \\n <p>An all language literature search was performed across 13 databases, 1951–2004, using &gt;60 key words, supplemented by ‘snowballing’ techniques. Quality standards included a novel confirmation of abuse scale. Updates used expanded key words, and a higher standard for confirmation of abuse.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results:</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 1495 potential studies, only three met the inclusion criteria for ageing of bruises in 2004, confirming that it is inaccurate to do so with the naked eye. This was roundly rejected when first reported, generating a wave of new studies attempting to determine a scientifically valid method to age bruises, none of which are applicable in children yet. Regarding patterns of bruising that may be suggestive or diagnostic of abuse, we included 23 of 167 studies reviewed in 2004, although only 2 were comparative studies. Included studies noted that unintentional bruises occur predominantly on the front of the body, over bony prominences and their presence is directly correlated to the child's level of independent mobility. Bruising patterns in abused children, differed in location (most common site being face, neck, ear, head, trunk, buttocks, arms), and tended to be larger. Updates have included a further 14 studies, including bruising in disabled children, defining distinguishing patterns in severely injured abused and non-abused children, and importance of petechiae.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions:</h3>\\n \\n <p>Systematic Reviews of bruising challenged accepted wisdom regarding ageing of bruises, which had no scientific basis; stimulated higher quality research on patterns of bruises distinguishing abusive and non-abusive bruising patterns, and highlighted the benefits of regular updates of these reviews.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"255-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1909\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebch.1909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebch.1909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

背景:长期以来,关于瘀伤的老化,以及某些瘀伤模式是否暗示或诊断儿童虐待的教条一直盛行。目的:我们针对这两个问题进行了首次系统评价,以确定当前临床实践的科学依据。自2004年以来,已有七次更新。方法:使用60个关键词,辅以滚雪球技术,对13个数据库1951-2004年间的所有语言文献进行检索。质量标准包括一个新的确认虐待量表。更新使用了扩展的关键词,并提高了确认滥用的标准。结果:在1495项潜在的研究中,只有3项符合2004年擦伤老化的纳入标准,证实了用肉眼进行的研究是不准确的。这在第一次报道时遭到了彻底的拒绝,并产生了一波新的研究,试图确定一种科学有效的方法来老化瘀伤,但目前还没有一种方法适用于儿童。关于可能暗示或诊断虐待的瘀伤模式,我们纳入了2004年回顾的167项研究中的23项,尽管只有2项是比较研究。包括的研究指出,无意的瘀伤主要发生在身体前部,骨骼突出部位,它们的存在与孩子的独立活动水平直接相关。受虐儿童的瘀伤类型在位置上不同(最常见的部位是面部、颈部、耳朵、头部、躯干、臀部、手臂),而且往往更大。更新的内容还包括另外14项研究,包括残疾儿童的瘀伤,界定严重受伤、受虐待和未受虐待儿童的区别模式,以及瘀点的重要性。结论:瘀伤的系统综述挑战了关于瘀伤老化的公认智慧,没有科学依据;促进了对瘀伤模式的高质量研究,以区分虐待性和非虐待性瘀伤模式,并强调了定期更新这些评论的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic reviews of bruising in relation to child abuse—what have we learnt: an overview of review updates

Background:

Dogma has long prevailed regarding the ageing of bruises, and whether certain patterns of bruising are suggestive or diagnostic of child abuse.

Objectives:

We conducted the first Systematic Reviews addressing these two issues, to determine the scientific basis for current clinical practice. There have been seven updates since 2004.

Methods:

An all language literature search was performed across 13 databases, 1951–2004, using >60 key words, supplemented by ‘snowballing’ techniques. Quality standards included a novel confirmation of abuse scale. Updates used expanded key words, and a higher standard for confirmation of abuse.

Results:

Of 1495 potential studies, only three met the inclusion criteria for ageing of bruises in 2004, confirming that it is inaccurate to do so with the naked eye. This was roundly rejected when first reported, generating a wave of new studies attempting to determine a scientifically valid method to age bruises, none of which are applicable in children yet. Regarding patterns of bruising that may be suggestive or diagnostic of abuse, we included 23 of 167 studies reviewed in 2004, although only 2 were comparative studies. Included studies noted that unintentional bruises occur predominantly on the front of the body, over bony prominences and their presence is directly correlated to the child's level of independent mobility. Bruising patterns in abused children, differed in location (most common site being face, neck, ear, head, trunk, buttocks, arms), and tended to be larger. Updates have included a further 14 studies, including bruising in disabled children, defining distinguishing patterns in severely injured abused and non-abused children, and importance of petechiae.

Conclusions:

Systematic Reviews of bruising challenged accepted wisdom regarding ageing of bruises, which had no scientific basis; stimulated higher quality research on patterns of bruises distinguishing abusive and non-abusive bruising patterns, and highlighted the benefits of regular updates of these reviews.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials Pros and cons … Formoterol or salmeterol for asthma—should they be used as monotherapy? Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1