Cochrane综述:新生儿髋关节发育不良的筛查方案

Damon Shorter, Timothy Hong, David A Osborn
{"title":"Cochrane综述:新生儿髋关节发育不良的筛查方案","authors":"Damon Shorter,&nbsp;Timothy Hong,&nbsp;David A Osborn","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Uncorrected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with long term morbidity such as gait abnormalities, chronic pain and degenerative arthritis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the effect of different screening programmes for DDH on the incidence of late presentation of congenital hip dislocation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Search methods</h3>\n \n <p>Searches were performed in CENTRAL (<i>The Cochrane Library</i>), MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 2011) supplemented by searches of clinical trial registries, conference proceedings, cross references and contacting expert informants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\n \n <p>Randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster trials comparing the effectiveness of screening programmes for DDH.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\n \n <p>Three independent review authors assessed study eligibility and quality, and extracted data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main results</h3>\n \n <p>No study examined the effect of screening (clinical and/or ultrasound) and early treatment versus not screening and later treatment.</p>\n \n <p>One study reported universal ultrasound compared to clinical examination alone did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery but was associated with a significant increase in treatment.</p>\n \n <p>One study reported targeted ultrasound compared to clinical examination alone did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery, with no significant difference in rate of treatment.</p>\n \n <p>Meta-analysis of two studies found universal ultrasound compared to targeted ultrasound did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery. There was heterogeneity between studies reporting the effect on treatment rate.</p>\n \n <p>Meta-analysis of two studies found delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting compared to immediate splinting of infants with unstable (but not dislocated) hips resulted in no significant difference in the rate of late diagnosed DDH. Both studies reported a significant reduction in treatment with use of delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting.</p>\n \n <p>One study reported delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting compared to immediate splinting of infants with mild hip dysplasia on ultrasound resulted in no significant difference in late diagnosed DDH but a significant reduction in treatment. No infants in either group received surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Authors' conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There is insufficient evidence to give clear recommendations for practice. There is inconsistent evidence that universal ultrasound results in a significant increase in treatment compared to the use of targeted ultrasound or clinical examination alone. Neither of the ultrasound strategies have been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes including late diagnosed DDH and surgery. The studies are substantially underpowered to detect significant differences in the uncommon event of late detected DDH or surgery. For infants with unstable hips or mildly dysplastic hips, use of delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting reduces treatment without significantly increasing the rate of late diagnosed DDH or surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p><b>Screening methods for dislocated or improperly formed hips in newborn infants</b></p>\n \n <p>The hip joint is a ball and socket joint. Newborns may have hips that are not in their socket (dislocated) or hips that are improperly formed (dysplasia). Risk factors for hip dysplasia include a family history of a similar problem and female infants delivered in the breech position. The hips of most newborns will be examined clinically after birth and during infancy to determine whether they are stable, unstable or dislocated. Screening for hip dysplasia may prevent the need for late treatment, which is associated with long term hip deformity, gait disturbance and arthritis. However, early screening leads to increased treatment. Treatment may be complicated by damage to the hip due to impairment of the blood supply (avascular necrosis).</p>\n \n <p>This review found no studies that compared the benefits and costs of early screening versus not screening for hip problems. Studies that compared the addition of ultrasound to clinical examination reported that when ultrasound was performed on all infants, the rate of treatment increased with no significant difference in rate of late detected dysplasia or surgery. Targeted ultrasound to infants at high risk of hip dysplasia did not significantly increase the rate of treatment but also did not significantly reduce the rate of late detected dysplasia or surgery. It is not possible to give clear recommendations for hip screening of newborn infants from the available evidence.</p>\n \n <p>Where infants are clinically detected as having unstable but not dislocated hips, or are detected on ultrasound to have mild hip dysplasia, there is evidence that delaying treatment by two to eight weeks reduces the need for treatment without a significant increase in late diagnosed dysplasia or surgery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1891","citationCount":"168","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochrane Review: Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants\",\"authors\":\"Damon Shorter,&nbsp;Timothy Hong,&nbsp;David A Osborn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ebch.1891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Uncorrected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with long term morbidity such as gait abnormalities, chronic pain and degenerative arthritis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine the effect of different screening programmes for DDH on the incidence of late presentation of congenital hip dislocation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Search methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Searches were performed in CENTRAL (<i>The Cochrane Library</i>), MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 2011) supplemented by searches of clinical trial registries, conference proceedings, cross references and contacting expert informants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\\n \\n <p>Randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster trials comparing the effectiveness of screening programmes for DDH.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three independent review authors assessed study eligibility and quality, and extracted data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No study examined the effect of screening (clinical and/or ultrasound) and early treatment versus not screening and later treatment.</p>\\n \\n <p>One study reported universal ultrasound compared to clinical examination alone did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery but was associated with a significant increase in treatment.</p>\\n \\n <p>One study reported targeted ultrasound compared to clinical examination alone did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery, with no significant difference in rate of treatment.</p>\\n \\n <p>Meta-analysis of two studies found universal ultrasound compared to targeted ultrasound did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery. There was heterogeneity between studies reporting the effect on treatment rate.</p>\\n \\n <p>Meta-analysis of two studies found delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting compared to immediate splinting of infants with unstable (but not dislocated) hips resulted in no significant difference in the rate of late diagnosed DDH. Both studies reported a significant reduction in treatment with use of delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting.</p>\\n \\n <p>One study reported delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting compared to immediate splinting of infants with mild hip dysplasia on ultrasound resulted in no significant difference in late diagnosed DDH but a significant reduction in treatment. No infants in either group received surgery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Authors' conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is insufficient evidence to give clear recommendations for practice. There is inconsistent evidence that universal ultrasound results in a significant increase in treatment compared to the use of targeted ultrasound or clinical examination alone. Neither of the ultrasound strategies have been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes including late diagnosed DDH and surgery. The studies are substantially underpowered to detect significant differences in the uncommon event of late detected DDH or surgery. For infants with unstable hips or mildly dysplastic hips, use of delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting reduces treatment without significantly increasing the rate of late diagnosed DDH or surgery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\\n \\n <p><b>Screening methods for dislocated or improperly formed hips in newborn infants</b></p>\\n \\n <p>The hip joint is a ball and socket joint. Newborns may have hips that are not in their socket (dislocated) or hips that are improperly formed (dysplasia). Risk factors for hip dysplasia include a family history of a similar problem and female infants delivered in the breech position. The hips of most newborns will be examined clinically after birth and during infancy to determine whether they are stable, unstable or dislocated. Screening for hip dysplasia may prevent the need for late treatment, which is associated with long term hip deformity, gait disturbance and arthritis. However, early screening leads to increased treatment. Treatment may be complicated by damage to the hip due to impairment of the blood supply (avascular necrosis).</p>\\n \\n <p>This review found no studies that compared the benefits and costs of early screening versus not screening for hip problems. Studies that compared the addition of ultrasound to clinical examination reported that when ultrasound was performed on all infants, the rate of treatment increased with no significant difference in rate of late detected dysplasia or surgery. Targeted ultrasound to infants at high risk of hip dysplasia did not significantly increase the rate of treatment but also did not significantly reduce the rate of late detected dysplasia or surgery. It is not possible to give clear recommendations for hip screening of newborn infants from the available evidence.</p>\\n \\n <p>Where infants are clinically detected as having unstable but not dislocated hips, or are detected on ultrasound to have mild hip dysplasia, there is evidence that delaying treatment by two to eight weeks reduces the need for treatment without a significant increase in late diagnosed dysplasia or surgery.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1891\",\"citationCount\":\"168\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebch.1891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebch.1891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 168

摘要

背景:未纠正的发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)与步态异常、慢性疼痛和退行性关节炎等长期发病率相关。目的探讨不同DDH筛查方案对晚期先天性髋关节脱位发生率的影响。检索方法在CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library)、MEDLINE和EMBASE(2011年1月)中进行检索,并辅以临床试验注册、会议记录、交叉参考文献和联系专家线人的检索。选择标准:比较DDH筛查方案有效性的随机、准随机或聚类试验。数据收集和分析三位独立的综述作者评估了研究的资格和质量,并提取了数据。没有研究检查筛查(临床和/或超声)和早期治疗与不筛查和晚期治疗的效果。一项研究报道,与单独的临床检查相比,普遍超声检查并没有导致晚期诊断的DDH或手术的显著减少,但与治疗的显著增加有关。一项研究报道,与单独的临床检查相比,靶向超声并没有导致晚期诊断DDH或手术的显著减少,治愈率也没有显著差异。两项研究的荟萃分析发现,与靶向超声相比,通用超声并没有显著减少晚期诊断的DDH或手术。报告对治愈率影响的研究之间存在异质性。两项研究的荟萃分析发现,对于髋关节不稳定(但未脱位)的婴儿,延迟超声和靶向夹板与立即夹板相比,在晚期诊断的DDH发生率上没有显著差异。两项研究都报道了使用延迟超声和靶向夹板治疗的显著减少。一项研究报道,对患有轻度髋关节发育不良的婴儿,超声检查延迟超声和靶向夹板与立即夹板相比,晚期诊断的DDH无显著差异,但治疗显著减少。两组婴儿均未接受手术治疗。作者的结论没有足够的证据给出明确的实践建议。有不一致的证据表明,与单独使用靶向超声或临床检查相比,普遍超声导致治疗显著增加。两种超声策略都没有被证明可以改善临床结果,包括晚期诊断的DDH和手术。这些研究基本上不足以发现晚期发现的DDH或手术的罕见事件的显著差异。对于髋关节不稳定或轻度发育不良的婴儿,使用延迟超声和有针对性的夹板可以减少治疗,而不会显著增加晚期诊断的DDH或手术的发生率。新生儿髋关节脱位或畸形的筛查方法髋关节为球窝关节。新生儿的髋关节可能不在髋臼内(脱臼)或髋关节形状不正确(发育不良)。髋发育不良的危险因素包括有类似问题的家族史和女婴采用臀位分娩。大多数新生儿的髋部在出生后和婴儿期都会进行临床检查,以确定它们是否稳定、不稳定或脱位。髋关节发育不良的筛查可以避免晚期治疗的需要,后者与长期髋关节畸形、步态障碍和关节炎有关。然而,早期筛查可以增加治疗。由于血液供应受损(缺血性坏死)而对髋关节造成损害,治疗可能会变得复杂。本综述没有发现比较早期筛查与不筛查髋关节问题的收益和成本的研究。比较在临床检查中加入超声的研究报告称,当对所有婴儿进行超声检查时,治疗率增加,但晚期发现的发育不良或手术率没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cochrane Review: Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants

Background

Uncorrected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with long term morbidity such as gait abnormalities, chronic pain and degenerative arthritis.

Objectives

To determine the effect of different screening programmes for DDH on the incidence of late presentation of congenital hip dislocation.

Search methods

Searches were performed in CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 2011) supplemented by searches of clinical trial registries, conference proceedings, cross references and contacting expert informants.

Selection criteria

Randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster trials comparing the effectiveness of screening programmes for DDH.

Data collection and analysis

Three independent review authors assessed study eligibility and quality, and extracted data.

Main results

No study examined the effect of screening (clinical and/or ultrasound) and early treatment versus not screening and later treatment.

One study reported universal ultrasound compared to clinical examination alone did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery but was associated with a significant increase in treatment.

One study reported targeted ultrasound compared to clinical examination alone did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery, with no significant difference in rate of treatment.

Meta-analysis of two studies found universal ultrasound compared to targeted ultrasound did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery. There was heterogeneity between studies reporting the effect on treatment rate.

Meta-analysis of two studies found delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting compared to immediate splinting of infants with unstable (but not dislocated) hips resulted in no significant difference in the rate of late diagnosed DDH. Both studies reported a significant reduction in treatment with use of delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting.

One study reported delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting compared to immediate splinting of infants with mild hip dysplasia on ultrasound resulted in no significant difference in late diagnosed DDH but a significant reduction in treatment. No infants in either group received surgery.

Authors' conclusions

There is insufficient evidence to give clear recommendations for practice. There is inconsistent evidence that universal ultrasound results in a significant increase in treatment compared to the use of targeted ultrasound or clinical examination alone. Neither of the ultrasound strategies have been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes including late diagnosed DDH and surgery. The studies are substantially underpowered to detect significant differences in the uncommon event of late detected DDH or surgery. For infants with unstable hips or mildly dysplastic hips, use of delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting reduces treatment without significantly increasing the rate of late diagnosed DDH or surgery.

Plain Language Summary

Screening methods for dislocated or improperly formed hips in newborn infants

The hip joint is a ball and socket joint. Newborns may have hips that are not in their socket (dislocated) or hips that are improperly formed (dysplasia). Risk factors for hip dysplasia include a family history of a similar problem and female infants delivered in the breech position. The hips of most newborns will be examined clinically after birth and during infancy to determine whether they are stable, unstable or dislocated. Screening for hip dysplasia may prevent the need for late treatment, which is associated with long term hip deformity, gait disturbance and arthritis. However, early screening leads to increased treatment. Treatment may be complicated by damage to the hip due to impairment of the blood supply (avascular necrosis).

This review found no studies that compared the benefits and costs of early screening versus not screening for hip problems. Studies that compared the addition of ultrasound to clinical examination reported that when ultrasound was performed on all infants, the rate of treatment increased with no significant difference in rate of late detected dysplasia or surgery. Targeted ultrasound to infants at high risk of hip dysplasia did not significantly increase the rate of treatment but also did not significantly reduce the rate of late detected dysplasia or surgery. It is not possible to give clear recommendations for hip screening of newborn infants from the available evidence.

Where infants are clinically detected as having unstable but not dislocated hips, or are detected on ultrasound to have mild hip dysplasia, there is evidence that delaying treatment by two to eight weeks reduces the need for treatment without a significant increase in late diagnosed dysplasia or surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials Pros and cons … Formoterol or salmeterol for asthma—should they be used as monotherapy? Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1