Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik, Oliver Zivanovic, Christian Rudlowski, Tobias Höller, Matthias Wolfgarten, Kirsten Kübler, Lars Schröder, Michael R Mallmann, Michael Mallmann, Martin Pölcher, Walther Kuhn
{"title":"妇产科学联合会(FIGO) IIIC期和IV期卵巢癌患者的间歇减容手术。","authors":"Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik, Oliver Zivanovic, Christian Rudlowski, Tobias Höller, Matthias Wolfgarten, Kirsten Kübler, Lars Schröder, Michael R Mallmann, Michael Mallmann, Martin Pölcher, Walther Kuhn","doi":"10.1159/000351256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the outcome in patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIIC and IV ovarian cancer were assessed.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>67 patients undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS) and ≥ 4 courses of platinum-based NAC were analyzed for survival, perioperative morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was 30 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months, the overall survival (OS) 34 months. The PFS of patients without residual disease (n = 23; 34.3%) was 31 months (p = 0.003), the OS 65 months (p = 0.001). PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients with no residual disease than in patients with 1-10 mm (n = 34; 47.9%) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0001, respectively) residual disease. No survival benefit was seen for patients with 1-10 mm compared to > 1 cm (n = 12; 16.9%) residual disease (PFS p = 0.518; OS p = 0.077). 1 patient (1.4%) died; 12 patients needed interventional treatment or operation (16.9%) within the first 30 days postoperatively. Out of these, 5 patients (7.0%) had residual or lasting disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAC and IDS are safe and feasible in this series of patients with unfavorable prognosis. IDS does not change the goal of complete cytoreduction and therefore does not compensate for a less radical surgical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":19684,"journal":{"name":"Onkologie","volume":"36 6","pages":"324-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000351256","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interval debulking surgery in patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik, Oliver Zivanovic, Christian Rudlowski, Tobias Höller, Matthias Wolfgarten, Kirsten Kübler, Lars Schröder, Michael R Mallmann, Michael Mallmann, Martin Pölcher, Walther Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000351256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the outcome in patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIIC and IV ovarian cancer were assessed.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>67 patients undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS) and ≥ 4 courses of platinum-based NAC were analyzed for survival, perioperative morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was 30 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months, the overall survival (OS) 34 months. The PFS of patients without residual disease (n = 23; 34.3%) was 31 months (p = 0.003), the OS 65 months (p = 0.001). PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients with no residual disease than in patients with 1-10 mm (n = 34; 47.9%) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0001, respectively) residual disease. No survival benefit was seen for patients with 1-10 mm compared to > 1 cm (n = 12; 16.9%) residual disease (PFS p = 0.518; OS p = 0.077). 1 patient (1.4%) died; 12 patients needed interventional treatment or operation (16.9%) within the first 30 days postoperatively. Out of these, 5 patients (7.0%) had residual or lasting disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAC and IDS are safe and feasible in this series of patients with unfavorable prognosis. IDS does not change the goal of complete cytoreduction and therefore does not compensate for a less radical surgical approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onkologie\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"324-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000351256\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000351256\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000351256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interval debulking surgery in patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer.
Background: The feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the outcome in patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIIC and IV ovarian cancer were assessed.
Patients and methods: 67 patients undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS) and ≥ 4 courses of platinum-based NAC were analyzed for survival, perioperative morbidity and mortality.
Results: The median follow-up was 30 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months, the overall survival (OS) 34 months. The PFS of patients without residual disease (n = 23; 34.3%) was 31 months (p = 0.003), the OS 65 months (p = 0.001). PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients with no residual disease than in patients with 1-10 mm (n = 34; 47.9%) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0001, respectively) residual disease. No survival benefit was seen for patients with 1-10 mm compared to > 1 cm (n = 12; 16.9%) residual disease (PFS p = 0.518; OS p = 0.077). 1 patient (1.4%) died; 12 patients needed interventional treatment or operation (16.9%) within the first 30 days postoperatively. Out of these, 5 patients (7.0%) had residual or lasting disability.
Conclusions: NAC and IDS are safe and feasible in this series of patients with unfavorable prognosis. IDS does not change the goal of complete cytoreduction and therefore does not compensate for a less radical surgical approach.