使用接触轮廓术和CCD显微镜对复合树脂体外产生的磨损部位进行定量:方法学研究。

Q4 Dentistry Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences Pub Date : 2012-06-01
Natthavoot Koottathape, Hidekazu Takahashi, Wernerj Finger, Masafumi Kanehira, Naohiko Iwasaki, Yujin Aoyagi
{"title":"使用接触轮廓术和CCD显微镜对复合树脂体外产生的磨损部位进行定量:方法学研究。","authors":"Natthavoot Koottathape,&nbsp;Hidekazu Takahashi,&nbsp;Wernerj Finger,&nbsp;Masafumi Kanehira,&nbsp;Naohiko Iwasaki,&nbsp;Yujin Aoyagi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although attritive and abrasive wear of recent composite resins has been substantially reduced, in vitro wear testing with reasonably simulating devices and quantitative determination of resulting wear is still needed. Three-dimensional scanning methods are frequently used for this purpose. The aim of this trial was to compare maximum depth of wear and volume loss of composite samples, evaluated with a contact profilometer and a non-contact CCD camera imaging system, respectively.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-three random composite specimens with wear traces produced in a ball-on-disc sliding device, using poppy seed slurry and PMMA suspension as third-body media, were evaluated with the contact profilometer (TalyScan 150, Taylor Hobson LTD, Leicester, UK) and with the digital CCD microscope (VHX1000, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). The target parameters were maximum depth of the wear and volume loss.Results - The individual time of measurement needed with the non-contact CCD method was almost three hours less than that with the contact method. Both, maximum depth of wear and volume loss data, recorded with the two methods were linearly correlated (r(2) > 0.97; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The contact scanning method and the non-contact CCD method are equally suitable for determination of maximum depth of wear and volume loss of abraded composite resins.</p>","PeriodicalId":39643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","volume":"59 2","pages":"53-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of in vitro produced wear sites on composite resins using contact profilometry and CCD microscopy: a methodological investigation.\",\"authors\":\"Natthavoot Koottathape,&nbsp;Hidekazu Takahashi,&nbsp;Wernerj Finger,&nbsp;Masafumi Kanehira,&nbsp;Naohiko Iwasaki,&nbsp;Yujin Aoyagi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although attritive and abrasive wear of recent composite resins has been substantially reduced, in vitro wear testing with reasonably simulating devices and quantitative determination of resulting wear is still needed. Three-dimensional scanning methods are frequently used for this purpose. The aim of this trial was to compare maximum depth of wear and volume loss of composite samples, evaluated with a contact profilometer and a non-contact CCD camera imaging system, respectively.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-three random composite specimens with wear traces produced in a ball-on-disc sliding device, using poppy seed slurry and PMMA suspension as third-body media, were evaluated with the contact profilometer (TalyScan 150, Taylor Hobson LTD, Leicester, UK) and with the digital CCD microscope (VHX1000, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). The target parameters were maximum depth of the wear and volume loss.Results - The individual time of measurement needed with the non-contact CCD method was almost three hours less than that with the contact method. Both, maximum depth of wear and volume loss data, recorded with the two methods were linearly correlated (r(2) > 0.97; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The contact scanning method and the non-contact CCD method are equally suitable for determination of maximum depth of wear and volume loss of abraded composite resins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"53-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管近年来复合树脂的摩擦磨损和磨料磨损已经大大减少,但仍然需要使用合理的模拟设备进行体外磨损测试并定量确定结果磨损。三维扫描方法经常用于此目的。该试验的目的是比较复合材料样品的最大磨损深度和体积损失,分别使用接触式轮廓仪和非接触式CCD相机成像系统进行评估。方法:使用接触轮廓仪(TalyScan 150, Taylor Hobson LTD, Leicester, UK)和数码CCD显微镜(VHX1000, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan)对23个随机合成的、带有磨损痕迹的样品进行评估。这些样品采用球盘滑动装置,以罂粟种子泥浆和PMMA悬浮液为第三体介质。目标参数为最大磨损深度和体积损失。结果-非接触式CCD方法所需的单个测量时间比接触式方法少近3小时。两种方法记录的最大磨损深度和体积损失数据均呈线性相关(r(2) > 0.97;P < 0.01)。结论:接触式扫描法和非接触式CCD法同样适用于复合树脂磨损的最大磨损深度和体积损失的测定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantification of in vitro produced wear sites on composite resins using contact profilometry and CCD microscopy: a methodological investigation.

Background: Although attritive and abrasive wear of recent composite resins has been substantially reduced, in vitro wear testing with reasonably simulating devices and quantitative determination of resulting wear is still needed. Three-dimensional scanning methods are frequently used for this purpose. The aim of this trial was to compare maximum depth of wear and volume loss of composite samples, evaluated with a contact profilometer and a non-contact CCD camera imaging system, respectively.

Method: Twenty-three random composite specimens with wear traces produced in a ball-on-disc sliding device, using poppy seed slurry and PMMA suspension as third-body media, were evaluated with the contact profilometer (TalyScan 150, Taylor Hobson LTD, Leicester, UK) and with the digital CCD microscope (VHX1000, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). The target parameters were maximum depth of the wear and volume loss.Results - The individual time of measurement needed with the non-contact CCD method was almost three hours less than that with the contact method. Both, maximum depth of wear and volume loss data, recorded with the two methods were linearly correlated (r(2) > 0.97; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The contact scanning method and the non-contact CCD method are equally suitable for determination of maximum depth of wear and volume loss of abraded composite resins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences
Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: "Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences" publishes the results of research conducted at Tokyo Medical and Dental University. The journal made its first appearance in 1954. We issue four numbers by the year.
期刊最新文献
Including clinic-based English education in dental curriculum, supplemented by e-learning Chronic sun exposure shortens telomeres of the epidermis Relationship between taste sensitivity and dental caries MICROROBOTICS IN ENDODONTICS – A REVIEW “FUNCTIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS” USED IN YOUNG GROWING INDIVIDUALS FOR CORRECTION OF SKELETAL CLASS II MALOCCLUSION: - MOST RELIABLE METHOD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1