吉西他滨和多西紫杉醇治疗转移性软组织肉瘤-单中心经验。

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine Onkologie Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-07-08 DOI:10.1159/000353564
Thomas Schmitt, Florentina Kosely, Patrick Wuchter, Johann-Wilhelm Schmier, Anthony D Ho, Gerlinde Egerer
{"title":"吉西他滨和多西紫杉醇治疗转移性软组织肉瘤-单中心经验。","authors":"Thomas Schmitt,&nbsp;Florentina Kosely,&nbsp;Patrick Wuchter,&nbsp;Johann-Wilhelm Schmier,&nbsp;Anthony D Ho,&nbsp;Gerlinde Egerer","doi":"10.1159/000353564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prognosis and survival for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are dismal. Standard first-line systemic chemotherapy is anthracycline-based. Gemcitabine/docetaxel (GD) is a therapeutic option in the second-line setting. Here we present the data of our single center retrospective analysis, using GD in locally advanced or metastatic disease.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between 2005 and 2012, a total of 34 patients were identified. The majority of tumors were located in the extremities (19/34, 56%) and abdomen/retroperitoneum (10/34, 29%). Most frequent histologies included leiomyosarcoma (13/34, 38%), liposarcoma (7/34, 21%), and pleomorphic sarcoma (6/34, 18%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Objective response to treatment by RECIST criteria after 3 cycles was low with 6% partial responses (PR, 2/34), 65% stable disease (SD, 22/34), and 29% progressive disease (PD, 10/34). Progression-free survival at 3 and 6 months was 77 and 62%, respectively. Patients with a clinical benefit (defined as PR or SD after the 3rd treatment cycle) had a significantly prolonged median progression-free and overall survival with 8.6 months (p < 0.0001; hazard ratio (HR) 33.1) and 22.4 months (p < 0.0001; HR 12.9), respectively. Most common toxicities included hand-foot syndrome, edema, pancytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and mucositis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, we conclude that GD is an active second-line regimen in metastatic STS, with manageable side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":19684,"journal":{"name":"Onkologie","volume":"36 7-8","pages":"415-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000353564","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gemcitabine and docetaxel for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma - a single center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Schmitt,&nbsp;Florentina Kosely,&nbsp;Patrick Wuchter,&nbsp;Johann-Wilhelm Schmier,&nbsp;Anthony D Ho,&nbsp;Gerlinde Egerer\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000353564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prognosis and survival for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are dismal. Standard first-line systemic chemotherapy is anthracycline-based. Gemcitabine/docetaxel (GD) is a therapeutic option in the second-line setting. Here we present the data of our single center retrospective analysis, using GD in locally advanced or metastatic disease.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between 2005 and 2012, a total of 34 patients were identified. The majority of tumors were located in the extremities (19/34, 56%) and abdomen/retroperitoneum (10/34, 29%). Most frequent histologies included leiomyosarcoma (13/34, 38%), liposarcoma (7/34, 21%), and pleomorphic sarcoma (6/34, 18%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Objective response to treatment by RECIST criteria after 3 cycles was low with 6% partial responses (PR, 2/34), 65% stable disease (SD, 22/34), and 29% progressive disease (PD, 10/34). Progression-free survival at 3 and 6 months was 77 and 62%, respectively. Patients with a clinical benefit (defined as PR or SD after the 3rd treatment cycle) had a significantly prolonged median progression-free and overall survival with 8.6 months (p < 0.0001; hazard ratio (HR) 33.1) and 22.4 months (p < 0.0001; HR 12.9), respectively. Most common toxicities included hand-foot syndrome, edema, pancytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and mucositis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, we conclude that GD is an active second-line regimen in metastatic STS, with manageable side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onkologie\",\"volume\":\"36 7-8\",\"pages\":\"415-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000353564\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000353564\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000353564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:转移性软组织肉瘤(STS)患者的预后和生存率都很差。标准的一线全身化疗以蒽环类药物为基础。吉西他滨/多西他赛(GD)是一种二线治疗方案。在这里,我们提出了单中心回顾性分析的数据,在局部晚期或转移性疾病中使用GD。患者与方法:2005 - 2012年共纳入34例患者。大多数肿瘤位于四肢(19/ 34,56 %)和腹部/腹膜后(10/ 34,29 %)。最常见的组织学包括平滑肌肉瘤(13/ 34,38%)、脂肪肉瘤(7/ 34,21%)和多形性肉瘤(6/ 34,18%)。结果:3个周期后,RECIST标准治疗的客观反应较低,部分缓解为6% (PR, 2/34),疾病稳定为65% (SD, 22/34),疾病进展为29% (PD, 10/34)。3个月和6个月的无进展生存率分别为77%和62%。获得临床获益的患者(定义为第3个治疗周期后的PR或SD)的中位无进展生存期和总生存期显著延长,为8.6个月(p < 0.0001;风险比(HR) 33.1)和22.4个月(p < 0.0001;HR 12.9)。最常见的毒性包括手足综合征、水肿、全血细胞减少症、发热性中性粒细胞减少症和粘膜炎。结论:总的来说,我们得出结论,GD是转移性STS的一种积极的二线治疗方案,副作用可控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gemcitabine and docetaxel for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma - a single center experience.

Background: Prognosis and survival for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are dismal. Standard first-line systemic chemotherapy is anthracycline-based. Gemcitabine/docetaxel (GD) is a therapeutic option in the second-line setting. Here we present the data of our single center retrospective analysis, using GD in locally advanced or metastatic disease.

Patients and methods: Between 2005 and 2012, a total of 34 patients were identified. The majority of tumors were located in the extremities (19/34, 56%) and abdomen/retroperitoneum (10/34, 29%). Most frequent histologies included leiomyosarcoma (13/34, 38%), liposarcoma (7/34, 21%), and pleomorphic sarcoma (6/34, 18%).

Results: Objective response to treatment by RECIST criteria after 3 cycles was low with 6% partial responses (PR, 2/34), 65% stable disease (SD, 22/34), and 29% progressive disease (PD, 10/34). Progression-free survival at 3 and 6 months was 77 and 62%, respectively. Patients with a clinical benefit (defined as PR or SD after the 3rd treatment cycle) had a significantly prolonged median progression-free and overall survival with 8.6 months (p < 0.0001; hazard ratio (HR) 33.1) and 22.4 months (p < 0.0001; HR 12.9), respectively. Most common toxicities included hand-foot syndrome, edema, pancytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and mucositis.

Conclusion: Overall, we conclude that GD is an active second-line regimen in metastatic STS, with manageable side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Onkologie
Onkologie 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer Trends in the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer Management of adverse reactions during treatment of anal cancer Tinnitus - an initial symptom of synchronous occurence of paraganglioma and renal cell carcinoma in a germline mutation of the SDHB gene (PGL4 snydrome) Hepatoblastoma in three siblings associated with familial adenomatous polyposis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1