5-氟尿嘧啶、丝裂霉素和k多糖对局部晚期胃癌根治性切除患者的辅助免疫化疗效果比较

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine Onkologie Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-06-22 DOI:10.1159/000349957
Mi-Sun Ahn, Seok-Yun Kang, Hyun-Woo Lee, Seong-Hyun Jeong, Joon-Seong Park, Kwang-Jae Lee, Yong-Kwan Cho, Sang-Uk Han, Soon-Young Lee, Ho-Yeong Lim, Jin-Hyuk Choi
{"title":"5-氟尿嘧啶、丝裂霉素和k多糖对局部晚期胃癌根治性切除患者的辅助免疫化疗效果比较","authors":"Mi-Sun Ahn, Seok-Yun Kang, Hyun-Woo Lee, Seong-Hyun Jeong, Joon-Seong Park, Kwang-Jae Lee, Yong-Kwan Cho, Sang-Uk Han, Soon-Young Lee, Ho-Yeong Lim, Jin-Hyuk Choi","doi":"10.1159/000349957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the small but significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), the optimal regimen remains to be determined. We conducted a randomized trial comparing oral (PO) chemoimmunotherapy (CITX) with intravenous (IV) CITX in LAGC patients (stages IB-IIIB) with curative resection (≥ D2 dissection). Methods: The patients were randomized to the IV (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 weekly for 24 weeks, mitomycin-C 8 mg/m2 every 6 weeks × 4) or the PO (uracil-ftorafur (UFT) 400-600 mg/day for 12 months) group. Patients in both groups received PO polysaccharide-K (3 g/day for 4 months). The planned number of patients was 368 for proving the non-inferiority of PO CITX compared to IV CITX for overall survival. Results: The trial was closed prematurely after enrolling 82 patients (44 in the IV group, 38 in the PO group). With a median follow-up of 82 months, there were no significant differences in the 5-year disease-free survival (73% vs. 55%, p = 0.358) and overall survival (77% vs. 66%, p = 0.159) between the 2 groups. The IV group demonstrated a higher incidence of grade 2 or 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and vomiting. Conclusions: PO CITX with UFT appeared to be at least non-inferior to 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C CITX, with lower toxicity in the adjuvant treatment for LAGC.","PeriodicalId":19684,"journal":{"name":"Onkologie","volume":"36 7-8","pages":"421-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000349957","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5-Fluorouracil, mitomycin-c, and polysaccharide-k versus uracil-ftorafur and polysaccharide-K as adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with curative resection.\",\"authors\":\"Mi-Sun Ahn, Seok-Yun Kang, Hyun-Woo Lee, Seong-Hyun Jeong, Joon-Seong Park, Kwang-Jae Lee, Yong-Kwan Cho, Sang-Uk Han, Soon-Young Lee, Ho-Yeong Lim, Jin-Hyuk Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000349957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Despite the small but significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), the optimal regimen remains to be determined. We conducted a randomized trial comparing oral (PO) chemoimmunotherapy (CITX) with intravenous (IV) CITX in LAGC patients (stages IB-IIIB) with curative resection (≥ D2 dissection). Methods: The patients were randomized to the IV (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 weekly for 24 weeks, mitomycin-C 8 mg/m2 every 6 weeks × 4) or the PO (uracil-ftorafur (UFT) 400-600 mg/day for 12 months) group. Patients in both groups received PO polysaccharide-K (3 g/day for 4 months). The planned number of patients was 368 for proving the non-inferiority of PO CITX compared to IV CITX for overall survival. Results: The trial was closed prematurely after enrolling 82 patients (44 in the IV group, 38 in the PO group). With a median follow-up of 82 months, there were no significant differences in the 5-year disease-free survival (73% vs. 55%, p = 0.358) and overall survival (77% vs. 66%, p = 0.159) between the 2 groups. The IV group demonstrated a higher incidence of grade 2 or 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and vomiting. Conclusions: PO CITX with UFT appeared to be at least non-inferior to 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C CITX, with lower toxicity in the adjuvant treatment for LAGC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onkologie\",\"volume\":\"36 7-8\",\"pages\":\"421-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000349957\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000349957\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/6/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000349957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:尽管局部晚期胃癌(LAGC)辅助化疗的生存获益虽小但显著,但最佳方案仍有待确定。我们进行了一项随机试验,比较口服(PO)化学免疫治疗(CITX)与静脉(IV) CITX对IB-IIIB期LAGC患者的疗效性切除(≥D2夹层)。方法:将患者随机分为静脉注射组(5-氟尿嘧啶500 mg/m(2),每周24周,丝裂霉素- c 8 mg/m(2),每6周× 4次)或PO组(尿嘧啶-氟脲(UFT) 400-600 mg/d,持续12个月)。两组患者均给予PO多糖- k (3 g/d,连用4个月)。计划患者数量为368例,以证明PO CITX与IV CITX相比在总生存期方面的非劣效性。结果:试验纳入82例患者(IV组44例,PO组38例)后提前结束。中位随访82个月,两组患者的5年无病生存率(73%对55%,p = 0.358)和总生存率(77%对66%,p = 0.159)无显著差异。静脉注射组出现2级或3级中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少和呕吐的发生率较高。结论:PO CITX联合UFT至少不逊于5-氟尿嘧啶和丝裂霉素c CITX,在LAGC辅助治疗中的毒性更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5-Fluorouracil, mitomycin-c, and polysaccharide-k versus uracil-ftorafur and polysaccharide-K as adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with curative resection.
Background: Despite the small but significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), the optimal regimen remains to be determined. We conducted a randomized trial comparing oral (PO) chemoimmunotherapy (CITX) with intravenous (IV) CITX in LAGC patients (stages IB-IIIB) with curative resection (≥ D2 dissection). Methods: The patients were randomized to the IV (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 weekly for 24 weeks, mitomycin-C 8 mg/m2 every 6 weeks × 4) or the PO (uracil-ftorafur (UFT) 400-600 mg/day for 12 months) group. Patients in both groups received PO polysaccharide-K (3 g/day for 4 months). The planned number of patients was 368 for proving the non-inferiority of PO CITX compared to IV CITX for overall survival. Results: The trial was closed prematurely after enrolling 82 patients (44 in the IV group, 38 in the PO group). With a median follow-up of 82 months, there were no significant differences in the 5-year disease-free survival (73% vs. 55%, p = 0.358) and overall survival (77% vs. 66%, p = 0.159) between the 2 groups. The IV group demonstrated a higher incidence of grade 2 or 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and vomiting. Conclusions: PO CITX with UFT appeared to be at least non-inferior to 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C CITX, with lower toxicity in the adjuvant treatment for LAGC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Onkologie
Onkologie 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer Trends in the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer Management of adverse reactions during treatment of anal cancer Tinnitus - an initial symptom of synchronous occurence of paraganglioma and renal cell carcinoma in a germline mutation of the SDHB gene (PGL4 snydrome) Hepatoblastoma in three siblings associated with familial adenomatous polyposis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1