R Rokyta, V Pechman, P Tousek, R Pudil, J Lhotska, P Widimsky
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的机械通气心源性休克患者的常规预处理与标准围手术期治疗:布拉格-7研究的亚分析","authors":"R Rokyta, V Pechman, P Tousek, R Pudil, J Lhotska, P Widimsky","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical outcome of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) who require mechanical ventilation (MV) is poor.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the impact of abciximab pretreatment in this high-risk population of MI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was a retrospective subanalysis of the multicentre randomized Routine Upfront Abciximab Versus Standard Peri-Procedural Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock (PRAGUE-7) study, which included 80 MI patients in CS undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients were randomly assigned into group A (routine pretreatment with an abciximab bolus followed by a 1 h abciximab infusion) and group B (standard therapy). The subanalysis included 37 patients requiring MV. Seventeen patients were in group A and 20 were in group B. The primary end point (death/stroke/reinfarction/new severe renal failure) at 30 days, procedural success (thrombosis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] flow) and frequency of bleeding were assessed. The χ(2) and Student's t tests were used for statistical analysis; P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary end point occurred in nine (53%) patients in group A and 12 (60%) patients in group B (P=0.66). TIMI flow after primary PCI was higher in group A (2.75 versus 2.31; P<0.05). Major bleeding occurred in 12% of patients in group A versus 10% of patients in group B (P=0.86). Minor or minimal bleeding was more common in group A (29%) compared with group B (5%; P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the present study suggest that routine pretreatment with abciximab before primary PCI in mechanically ventilated patients with MI complicated by cardiogenic shock was associated with better angiographic results but also with a higher incidence of bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":54377,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology","volume":"18 2","pages":"81-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3718580/pdf/ecc18081.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine pretreatment with abciximab versus standard periprocedural therapy in mechanically ventilated cardiogenic shock patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Subanalysis of the PRAGUE-7 study.\",\"authors\":\"R Rokyta, V Pechman, P Tousek, R Pudil, J Lhotska, P Widimsky\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical outcome of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) who require mechanical ventilation (MV) is poor.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the impact of abciximab pretreatment in this high-risk population of MI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was a retrospective subanalysis of the multicentre randomized Routine Upfront Abciximab Versus Standard Peri-Procedural Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock (PRAGUE-7) study, which included 80 MI patients in CS undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients were randomly assigned into group A (routine pretreatment with an abciximab bolus followed by a 1 h abciximab infusion) and group B (standard therapy). The subanalysis included 37 patients requiring MV. Seventeen patients were in group A and 20 were in group B. The primary end point (death/stroke/reinfarction/new severe renal failure) at 30 days, procedural success (thrombosis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] flow) and frequency of bleeding were assessed. The χ(2) and Student's t tests were used for statistical analysis; P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary end point occurred in nine (53%) patients in group A and 12 (60%) patients in group B (P=0.66). TIMI flow after primary PCI was higher in group A (2.75 versus 2.31; P<0.05). Major bleeding occurred in 12% of patients in group A versus 10% of patients in group B (P=0.86). Minor or minimal bleeding was more common in group A (29%) compared with group B (5%; P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the present study suggest that routine pretreatment with abciximab before primary PCI in mechanically ventilated patients with MI complicated by cardiogenic shock was associated with better angiographic results but also with a higher incidence of bleeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"81-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3718580/pdf/ecc18081.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:心肌梗死(MI)合并心源性休克(CS)需要机械通气(MV)治疗的患者临床预后较差。目的:分析阿昔单抗预处理对心肌梗死高危人群的影响。方法:本研究是对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心源性休克患者的多中心随机常规前期阿昔昔单抗与标准围手术期治疗(布拉格-7)研究的回顾性亚分析,该研究包括80例接受初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的心肌梗死患者。患者被随机分为A组(常规治疗前给予阿昔单抗,然后输注1小时)和B组(标准治疗)。亚组分析包括37例需要MV的患者。A组17例,b组20例。评估30天的主要终点(死亡/卒中/再梗死/新发严重肾功能衰竭)、手术成功率(心肌梗死血栓形成[TIMI]流)和出血频率。采用χ(2)检验和Student’st检验进行统计学分析;结果:A组9例(53%)患者出现主要终点,B组12例(60%)患者出现主要终点(P=0.66)。A组首次PCI术后TIMI流量较高(2.75 vs 2.31;结论:本研究结果提示,机械通气心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者首次PCI术前常规预处理阿昔单抗可获得较好的血管造影结果,但也可增加出血发生率。
Routine pretreatment with abciximab versus standard periprocedural therapy in mechanically ventilated cardiogenic shock patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Subanalysis of the PRAGUE-7 study.
Background: The clinical outcome of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) who require mechanical ventilation (MV) is poor.
Objective: To analyze the impact of abciximab pretreatment in this high-risk population of MI patients.
Methods: The present study was a retrospective subanalysis of the multicentre randomized Routine Upfront Abciximab Versus Standard Peri-Procedural Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock (PRAGUE-7) study, which included 80 MI patients in CS undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients were randomly assigned into group A (routine pretreatment with an abciximab bolus followed by a 1 h abciximab infusion) and group B (standard therapy). The subanalysis included 37 patients requiring MV. Seventeen patients were in group A and 20 were in group B. The primary end point (death/stroke/reinfarction/new severe renal failure) at 30 days, procedural success (thrombosis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] flow) and frequency of bleeding were assessed. The χ(2) and Student's t tests were used for statistical analysis; P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results: The primary end point occurred in nine (53%) patients in group A and 12 (60%) patients in group B (P=0.66). TIMI flow after primary PCI was higher in group A (2.75 versus 2.31; P<0.05). Major bleeding occurred in 12% of patients in group A versus 10% of patients in group B (P=0.86). Minor or minimal bleeding was more common in group A (29%) compared with group B (5%; P<0.05).
Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest that routine pretreatment with abciximab before primary PCI in mechanically ventilated patients with MI complicated by cardiogenic shock was associated with better angiographic results but also with a higher incidence of bleeding.