随机停药试验设计中所有治疗患者无进展生存期的估计。

IF 1.8 4区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY American Statistician Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00031305.2012.720900
Theodore G Karrison, Mark J Ratain, Walter M Stadler, Gary L Rosner
{"title":"随机停药试验设计中所有治疗患者无进展生存期的估计。","authors":"Theodore G Karrison,&nbsp;Mark J Ratain,&nbsp;Walter M Stadler,&nbsp;Gary L Rosner","doi":"10.1080/00031305.2012.720900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The randomized discontinuation trial (RDT) design is an enrichment-type design that has been used in a variety of diseases to evaluate the efficacy of new treatments. The RDT design seeks to select a more homogeneous group of patients, consisting of those who are more likely to show a treatment benefit if one exists. In oncology, the RDT design has been applied to evaluate the effects of cytostatic agents, that is, drugs that act primarily by slowing tumor growth rather than shrinking tumors. In the RDT design, all patients receive treatment during an initial, open-label run-in period of duration <i>T</i>. Patients with objective response (substantial tumor shrinkage) remain on therapy while those with early progressive disease are removed from the trial. Patients with stable disease (SD) are then randomized to either continue active treatment or switched to placebo. The main analysis compares outcomes, for example, progression-free survival (PFS), between the two randomized arms. As a secondary objective, investigators may seek to estimate PFS for all treated patients, measured from the time of entry into the study, by combining information from the run-in and post run-in periods. For <i>t ≤ T</i>, PFS is estimated by the observed proportion of patients who are progression-free among all patients enrolled. For <i>t > T</i>, the estimate can be expressed as <i>Ŝ</i>(<i>t</i>) = <i>p̂</i><sub>OR</sub> × <i>Ŝ</i><sub>OR</sub>(<i>t - T</i>) + <i>p̂</i><sub>SD</sub> × <i>Ŝ</i><sub>SD</sub>(<i>t - T</i>), where <i>p̂</i><sub>OR</sub> is the estimated probability of response during the run-in period, <i>p̂</i><sub>SD</sub> is the estimated probability of SD, and <i>Ŝ</i><sub>OR</sub>(<i>t - T</i>) and <i>Ŝ</i><sub>SD</sub>(<i>t - T</i>) are the Kaplan-Meier estimates of subsequent PFS in the responders and patients with SD randomized to continue treatment, respectively. In this article, we derive the variance of <i>Ŝ</i>(<i>t</i>), enabling the construction of confidence intervals for both <i>S</i>(<i>t</i>) and the median survival time. Simulation results indicate that the method provides accurate coverage rates. An interesting aspect of the design is that outcomes during the run-in phase have a negative multinomial distribution, something not frequently encountered in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50801,"journal":{"name":"American Statistician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00031305.2012.720900","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Progression-Free Survival for All Treated Patients in the Randomized Discontinuation Trial Design.\",\"authors\":\"Theodore G Karrison,&nbsp;Mark J Ratain,&nbsp;Walter M Stadler,&nbsp;Gary L Rosner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00031305.2012.720900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The randomized discontinuation trial (RDT) design is an enrichment-type design that has been used in a variety of diseases to evaluate the efficacy of new treatments. The RDT design seeks to select a more homogeneous group of patients, consisting of those who are more likely to show a treatment benefit if one exists. In oncology, the RDT design has been applied to evaluate the effects of cytostatic agents, that is, drugs that act primarily by slowing tumor growth rather than shrinking tumors. In the RDT design, all patients receive treatment during an initial, open-label run-in period of duration <i>T</i>. Patients with objective response (substantial tumor shrinkage) remain on therapy while those with early progressive disease are removed from the trial. Patients with stable disease (SD) are then randomized to either continue active treatment or switched to placebo. The main analysis compares outcomes, for example, progression-free survival (PFS), between the two randomized arms. As a secondary objective, investigators may seek to estimate PFS for all treated patients, measured from the time of entry into the study, by combining information from the run-in and post run-in periods. For <i>t ≤ T</i>, PFS is estimated by the observed proportion of patients who are progression-free among all patients enrolled. For <i>t > T</i>, the estimate can be expressed as <i>Ŝ</i>(<i>t</i>) = <i>p̂</i><sub>OR</sub> × <i>Ŝ</i><sub>OR</sub>(<i>t - T</i>) + <i>p̂</i><sub>SD</sub> × <i>Ŝ</i><sub>SD</sub>(<i>t - T</i>), where <i>p̂</i><sub>OR</sub> is the estimated probability of response during the run-in period, <i>p̂</i><sub>SD</sub> is the estimated probability of SD, and <i>Ŝ</i><sub>OR</sub>(<i>t - T</i>) and <i>Ŝ</i><sub>SD</sub>(<i>t - T</i>) are the Kaplan-Meier estimates of subsequent PFS in the responders and patients with SD randomized to continue treatment, respectively. In this article, we derive the variance of <i>Ŝ</i>(<i>t</i>), enabling the construction of confidence intervals for both <i>S</i>(<i>t</i>) and the median survival time. Simulation results indicate that the method provides accurate coverage rates. An interesting aspect of the design is that outcomes during the run-in phase have a negative multinomial distribution, something not frequently encountered in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Statistician\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00031305.2012.720900\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Statistician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2012.720900\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Statistician","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2012.720900","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

随机停药试验(RDT)设计是一种富集型设计,已用于多种疾病来评估新疗法的疗效。RDT设计旨在选择一组更均匀的患者,包括那些更有可能显示出治疗益处(如果存在)的患者。在肿瘤学中,RDT设计已被用于评估细胞抑制剂的效果,即主要通过减缓肿瘤生长而不是缩小肿瘤来起作用的药物。在RDT设计中,所有患者在初始的开放标签磨合期t期间接受治疗,客观反应(肿瘤显著缩小)的患者继续接受治疗,而早期进展性疾病的患者则退出试验。病情稳定(SD)的患者随后被随机分为继续积极治疗组或改用安慰剂组。主要分析比较了两个随机组之间的结果,例如无进展生存期(PFS)。作为次要目标,研究人员可以通过结合磨合期和磨合期后的信息来估计所有治疗患者的PFS,从进入研究时开始测量。对于t≤t, PFS由所有入组患者中观察到的无进展患者的比例来估计。对于t > t,其估计值可表示为Ŝ(t) = p′OR × ŜOR(t - t) + p′SD × ŜSD(t - t),其中p′OR为磨合期应答的估计概率,p′SD为SD的估计概率,ŜOR(t - t)和ŜSD(t - t)分别为应答者和随机继续治疗的SD患者后续PFS的Kaplan-Meier估计值。在本文中,我们推导了Ŝ(t)的方差,从而能够构建S(t)和中位生存时间的置信区间。仿真结果表明,该方法可以提供准确的覆盖率。该设计的一个有趣方面是,磨合阶段的结果呈负多项分布,这在实践中并不常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of Progression-Free Survival for All Treated Patients in the Randomized Discontinuation Trial Design.

The randomized discontinuation trial (RDT) design is an enrichment-type design that has been used in a variety of diseases to evaluate the efficacy of new treatments. The RDT design seeks to select a more homogeneous group of patients, consisting of those who are more likely to show a treatment benefit if one exists. In oncology, the RDT design has been applied to evaluate the effects of cytostatic agents, that is, drugs that act primarily by slowing tumor growth rather than shrinking tumors. In the RDT design, all patients receive treatment during an initial, open-label run-in period of duration T. Patients with objective response (substantial tumor shrinkage) remain on therapy while those with early progressive disease are removed from the trial. Patients with stable disease (SD) are then randomized to either continue active treatment or switched to placebo. The main analysis compares outcomes, for example, progression-free survival (PFS), between the two randomized arms. As a secondary objective, investigators may seek to estimate PFS for all treated patients, measured from the time of entry into the study, by combining information from the run-in and post run-in periods. For t ≤ T, PFS is estimated by the observed proportion of patients who are progression-free among all patients enrolled. For t > T, the estimate can be expressed as Ŝ(t) = OR × ŜOR(t - T) + SD × ŜSD(t - T), where OR is the estimated probability of response during the run-in period, SD is the estimated probability of SD, and ŜOR(t - T) and ŜSD(t - T) are the Kaplan-Meier estimates of subsequent PFS in the responders and patients with SD randomized to continue treatment, respectively. In this article, we derive the variance of Ŝ(t), enabling the construction of confidence intervals for both S(t) and the median survival time. Simulation results indicate that the method provides accurate coverage rates. An interesting aspect of the design is that outcomes during the run-in phase have a negative multinomial distribution, something not frequently encountered in practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Statistician
American Statistician 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Are you looking for general-interest articles about current national and international statistical problems and programs; interesting and fun articles of a general nature about statistics and its applications; or the teaching of statistics? Then you are looking for The American Statistician (TAS), published quarterly by the American Statistical Association. TAS contains timely articles organized into the following sections: Statistical Practice, General, Teacher''s Corner, History Corner, Interdisciplinary, Statistical Computing and Graphics, Reviews of Books and Teaching Materials, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Causal Inference with Complex Surveys: A Unified Perspective on Sample Selection and Exposure Selection Performance Analysis of NSUM Estimators in Social-Network Topologies Cross-validatory Z-Residual for Diagnosing Shared Frailty Models A Pareto tail plot without moment restrictions Sparse-group boosting: Unbiased group and variable selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1