一期全口超声清创治疗吸烟者重度慢性牙周炎:初步盲随机临床试验

Tatiana Meulman, Ana Paula Oliveira Giorgetti, Julia Gimenes, Renato Corrêa Viana Casarin, Daiane Cristina Peruzzo, Francisco Humberto Nociti
{"title":"一期全口超声清创治疗吸烟者重度慢性牙周炎:初步盲随机临床试验","authors":"Tatiana Meulman,&nbsp;Ana Paula Oliveira Giorgetti,&nbsp;Julia Gimenes,&nbsp;Renato Corrêa Viana Casarin,&nbsp;Daiane Cristina Peruzzo,&nbsp;Francisco Humberto Nociti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this clinical trial was to assess the performance of a full-mouth ultrasonic debridement protocol in the treatment of severe chronic periodontitis in comparison with scaling and root planing in a quadrant-wise procedure in smokers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The trial consisted of 30 participants presenting with periodontitis divided into 3 groups: Group FMUD - full-mouth ultrasonic debridement, i.e., one session of 45 minutes of ultrasonic instrumentation for smokers (n = 10), Group SRP- scaling and root planing performed in a quadrant-wise manner for smokers (n = 10), and Group Control - SRP for nonsmokers (n = 10), treated following the same protocol as the SRP group. The parameters evaluated were: plaque/bleeding on probing indices, probing pocket depth, relative recession, and relative probing attachment level at baseline, 45, 90 and 180 days after therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement and scaling and root planing resulted in comparable gain of attachment 6 months after therapy. Both groups exhibited probing pocket depth reduction at all experimental periods as compared to baseline. Smokers, however, had less probing pocket depth reduction and relative probing attachment level gain compared to non-smokers, despite the mechanical protocol used (p < 0.05). Moreover, at 180 days, nonsmokers presented with fewer sites requiring re-treatment (probing pocket depth > 5 mm and bleeding on probing) than smokers (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement and scaling and root planing result in comparable clinical outcomes for the treatment of smokers with severe chronic periodontitis. Despite the non-surgical technique used, smokers had a less favorable clinical response than non-smokers.</p>","PeriodicalId":17281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One stage, full-mouth, ultrasonic debridement in the treatment of severe chronic periodontitis in smokers: a preliminary, blind and randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tatiana Meulman,&nbsp;Ana Paula Oliveira Giorgetti,&nbsp;Julia Gimenes,&nbsp;Renato Corrêa Viana Casarin,&nbsp;Daiane Cristina Peruzzo,&nbsp;Francisco Humberto Nociti\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this clinical trial was to assess the performance of a full-mouth ultrasonic debridement protocol in the treatment of severe chronic periodontitis in comparison with scaling and root planing in a quadrant-wise procedure in smokers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The trial consisted of 30 participants presenting with periodontitis divided into 3 groups: Group FMUD - full-mouth ultrasonic debridement, i.e., one session of 45 minutes of ultrasonic instrumentation for smokers (n = 10), Group SRP- scaling and root planing performed in a quadrant-wise manner for smokers (n = 10), and Group Control - SRP for nonsmokers (n = 10), treated following the same protocol as the SRP group. The parameters evaluated were: plaque/bleeding on probing indices, probing pocket depth, relative recession, and relative probing attachment level at baseline, 45, 90 and 180 days after therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement and scaling and root planing resulted in comparable gain of attachment 6 months after therapy. Both groups exhibited probing pocket depth reduction at all experimental periods as compared to baseline. Smokers, however, had less probing pocket depth reduction and relative probing attachment level gain compared to non-smokers, despite the mechanical protocol used (p < 0.05). Moreover, at 180 days, nonsmokers presented with fewer sites requiring re-treatment (probing pocket depth > 5 mm and bleeding on probing) than smokers (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement and scaling and root planing result in comparable clinical outcomes for the treatment of smokers with severe chronic periodontitis. Despite the non-surgical technique used, smokers had a less favorable clinical response than non-smokers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本临床试验的目的是评估全口超声清创方案在重度慢性牙周炎治疗中的表现,并与在吸烟者的象限手术中刮治和牙根刨平进行比较。材料和方法:该试验包括30名患有牙周炎的参与者,分为3组:FMUD组-全口超声清创,即吸烟者进行一次45分钟的超声器械治疗(n = 10), SRP组-吸烟者以象限方式进行刮治和牙根刨平(n = 10),对照组- SRP组非吸烟者(n = 10),按照与SRP组相同的方案治疗。评估的参数是:治疗后基线、45、90和180天的探针指数斑块/出血、探针口袋深度、相对消退和相对探针附着水平。结果:全口超声清创、刮治和牙根刨平治疗后6个月的附着性增加相当。与基线相比,两组在所有实验期间都表现出探测袋深度减少。然而,尽管采用了机械方案,吸烟者与非吸烟者相比,探测袋深度减少和相对探测附着水平增加较少(p < 0.05)。此外,在180天,不吸烟者需要再次治疗的部位(探测口袋深度> 5 mm和探测时出血)比吸烟者少(p < 0.05)。结论:全口超声清创、刮治和牙根刨平治疗重度慢性牙周炎的临床效果相当。尽管使用了非手术技术,吸烟者的临床反应不如不吸烟者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
One stage, full-mouth, ultrasonic debridement in the treatment of severe chronic periodontitis in smokers: a preliminary, blind and randomized clinical trial.

Objective: The aim of this clinical trial was to assess the performance of a full-mouth ultrasonic debridement protocol in the treatment of severe chronic periodontitis in comparison with scaling and root planing in a quadrant-wise procedure in smokers.

Materials and methods: The trial consisted of 30 participants presenting with periodontitis divided into 3 groups: Group FMUD - full-mouth ultrasonic debridement, i.e., one session of 45 minutes of ultrasonic instrumentation for smokers (n = 10), Group SRP- scaling and root planing performed in a quadrant-wise manner for smokers (n = 10), and Group Control - SRP for nonsmokers (n = 10), treated following the same protocol as the SRP group. The parameters evaluated were: plaque/bleeding on probing indices, probing pocket depth, relative recession, and relative probing attachment level at baseline, 45, 90 and 180 days after therapy.

Results: Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement and scaling and root planing resulted in comparable gain of attachment 6 months after therapy. Both groups exhibited probing pocket depth reduction at all experimental periods as compared to baseline. Smokers, however, had less probing pocket depth reduction and relative probing attachment level gain compared to non-smokers, despite the mechanical protocol used (p < 0.05). Moreover, at 180 days, nonsmokers presented with fewer sites requiring re-treatment (probing pocket depth > 5 mm and bleeding on probing) than smokers (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement and scaling and root planing result in comparable clinical outcomes for the treatment of smokers with severe chronic periodontitis. Despite the non-surgical technique used, smokers had a less favorable clinical response than non-smokers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Periodontal status in cannabis smokers. A systematic review. Impact of Subepithelial Connective Tissue for Root Coverage on Brazilian Patients' Quality of Life: A Longitudinal Clinical Study. Coefficient of variation of red cell distribution width has correlations to periodontal inflamed surface area in non-obese hypertensive patients. Immediate implant placement in periodontally infected sites- A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chitosan-based biomaterial and hyaluronic acid on the repair of intrabuccal bone defects in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1