直肠癌术前调强放射治疗的急性胃肠道毒性和肿瘤反应。

Arti Parekh, Minh Tam Truong, Itai Pashtan, Muhammad M Qureshi, Neil E Martin, Omer Nawaz, Sandra Cerda, John Willins, Kevan L Hartshorn, Lisa A Kachnic
{"title":"直肠癌术前调强放射治疗的急性胃肠道毒性和肿瘤反应。","authors":"Arti Parekh, Minh Tam Truong, Itai Pashtan, Muhammad M Qureshi, Neil E Martin, Omer Nawaz, Sandra Cerda, John Willins, Kevan L Hartshorn, Lisa A Kachnic","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (preopCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer is associated with grade 3 or higher acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. This study was conducted to determine whether intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) significantly reduces acute GI toxicity, compared to 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) in preopCRT for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of 48 patients treated between January 2002 and August 2010 with preopCRT for rectal cancer. 3D-CRT or IMRT was administered at a planned dose of 45-50.4 Gy to patients positioned prone on a bowel-displacement device. Data regarding patient and tumor characteristics, treatment, acute toxicity, and tumor response were collected. Comparisons of acute toxicity and treatment response between 3D-CRT and IMRT were performed with the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in radiation dose, median age, race, gender, stage, type of concurrent chemotherapy, pathologic complete response (pCR), or type of surgery (lower anterior or abdominal perineal resection) between 3D-CRT and IMRT. There was a significant reduction in grade 2 or higher GI toxicity (3D-CRT, 60.7%; IMRT, 30%; P = .036) and grade 2 or higher diarrhea (3D-CRT, 42.8%; IMRT, 10%; P = .014). Two patients who underwent 3D-CRT required a treatment break (grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 dehydration). Radiation duration was significantly less (IMRT, 35 days; 3D-CRT, 39 days; P ≤ .0001). pCR rates were 16.7% for 3D-CRT and 21.4% for IMRT (nonsignificant [NS]); pCR+microscopic residual rates were 57.1% for IMRT and 27.8% for 3D-CRT (P = .093).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maximal bowel displacement with IMRT yields favorable acute GI toxicity and pathologic downstaging profiles, as compared to 3D-CRT in preoperative CRT for rectal cancer and warrants further prospective investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12695,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR","volume":"6 5-6","pages":"137-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849901/pdf/gcr137.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute gastrointestinal toxicity and tumor response with preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy for rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Arti Parekh, Minh Tam Truong, Itai Pashtan, Muhammad M Qureshi, Neil E Martin, Omer Nawaz, Sandra Cerda, John Willins, Kevan L Hartshorn, Lisa A Kachnic\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (preopCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer is associated with grade 3 or higher acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. This study was conducted to determine whether intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) significantly reduces acute GI toxicity, compared to 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) in preopCRT for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of 48 patients treated between January 2002 and August 2010 with preopCRT for rectal cancer. 3D-CRT or IMRT was administered at a planned dose of 45-50.4 Gy to patients positioned prone on a bowel-displacement device. Data regarding patient and tumor characteristics, treatment, acute toxicity, and tumor response were collected. Comparisons of acute toxicity and treatment response between 3D-CRT and IMRT were performed with the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in radiation dose, median age, race, gender, stage, type of concurrent chemotherapy, pathologic complete response (pCR), or type of surgery (lower anterior or abdominal perineal resection) between 3D-CRT and IMRT. There was a significant reduction in grade 2 or higher GI toxicity (3D-CRT, 60.7%; IMRT, 30%; P = .036) and grade 2 or higher diarrhea (3D-CRT, 42.8%; IMRT, 10%; P = .014). Two patients who underwent 3D-CRT required a treatment break (grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 dehydration). Radiation duration was significantly less (IMRT, 35 days; 3D-CRT, 39 days; P ≤ .0001). pCR rates were 16.7% for 3D-CRT and 21.4% for IMRT (nonsignificant [NS]); pCR+microscopic residual rates were 57.1% for IMRT and 27.8% for 3D-CRT (P = .093).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maximal bowel displacement with IMRT yields favorable acute GI toxicity and pathologic downstaging profiles, as compared to 3D-CRT in preoperative CRT for rectal cancer and warrants further prospective investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR\",\"volume\":\"6 5-6\",\"pages\":\"137-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849901/pdf/gcr137.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局部晚期直肠癌的术前化学放疗(preopCRT)与3级或更高的急性胃肠道(GI)毒性有关。本研究旨在确定与三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)相比,强度调控放疗(IMRT)是否能显著降低直肠癌术前化疗的急性胃肠道毒性:对2002年1月至2010年8月期间接受直肠癌术前CRT治疗的48名患者进行了回顾性分析。患者俯卧在肠移位装置上,以 45-50.4 Gy 的计划剂量接受 3D-CRT 或 IMRT 治疗。收集了有关患者和肿瘤特征、治疗、急性毒性和肿瘤反应的数据。3D-CRT和IMRT的急性毒性和治疗反应的比较采用Chi-square或Fisher's exact检验:结果:3D-CRT和IMRT在放射剂量、中位年龄、种族、性别、分期、同期化疗类型、病理完全反应(pCR)或手术类型(前下部或腹部会阴切除术)方面无明显差异。2级或以上消化道毒性(3D-CRT,60.7%;IMRT,30%;P = .036)和2级或以上腹泻(3D-CRT,42.8%;IMRT,10%;P = .014)明显减少。两名接受 3D-CRT 的患者需要中断治疗(3 级腹泻和 3 级脱水)。3D-CRT的pCR率为16.7%,IMRT为21.4%(无显著性[NS]);IMRT的pCR+显微镜下残留率为57.1%,3D-CRT为27.8%(P = .093):结论:在直肠癌术前 CRT 中,与 3D-CRT 相比,采用 IMRT 进行最大程度的肠道移位可获得良好的急性消化道毒性和病理分期,值得进一步进行前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute gastrointestinal toxicity and tumor response with preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy for rectal cancer.

Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (preopCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer is associated with grade 3 or higher acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. This study was conducted to determine whether intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) significantly reduces acute GI toxicity, compared to 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) in preopCRT for rectal cancer.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 48 patients treated between January 2002 and August 2010 with preopCRT for rectal cancer. 3D-CRT or IMRT was administered at a planned dose of 45-50.4 Gy to patients positioned prone on a bowel-displacement device. Data regarding patient and tumor characteristics, treatment, acute toxicity, and tumor response were collected. Comparisons of acute toxicity and treatment response between 3D-CRT and IMRT were performed with the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

Results: There were no significant differences in radiation dose, median age, race, gender, stage, type of concurrent chemotherapy, pathologic complete response (pCR), or type of surgery (lower anterior or abdominal perineal resection) between 3D-CRT and IMRT. There was a significant reduction in grade 2 or higher GI toxicity (3D-CRT, 60.7%; IMRT, 30%; P = .036) and grade 2 or higher diarrhea (3D-CRT, 42.8%; IMRT, 10%; P = .014). Two patients who underwent 3D-CRT required a treatment break (grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 dehydration). Radiation duration was significantly less (IMRT, 35 days; 3D-CRT, 39 days; P ≤ .0001). pCR rates were 16.7% for 3D-CRT and 21.4% for IMRT (nonsignificant [NS]); pCR+microscopic residual rates were 57.1% for IMRT and 27.8% for 3D-CRT (P = .093).

Conclusion: Maximal bowel displacement with IMRT yields favorable acute GI toxicity and pathologic downstaging profiles, as compared to 3D-CRT in preoperative CRT for rectal cancer and warrants further prospective investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the liver to the foot: a case of systemic embolism and acrometastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Pseudomyxoma peritonei metastatic to the bone: case report and review of systemic management. Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Intra-atrial Extension Responding to Transarterial Chemoembolization via the Right Hepatic and Right Inferior Phrenic Arteries. Metastatic breast cancer masquerading as primary gastric cancer: case report and review of the literature. A case of primary colonic small-cell carcinoma arising in a patient with long-standing ulcerative colitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1