在移植拔牙部位放置单牙种植体的临床和影像学评价:一年报告。

Ahmad Kutkut, Sebastiano Andreana, Edward Monaco
{"title":"在移植拔牙部位放置单牙种植体的临床和影像学评价:一年报告。","authors":"Ahmad Kutkut,&nbsp;Sebastiano Andreana,&nbsp;Edward Monaco","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this report was to clinically and radiographically evaluate changes to the hard and soft tissues around implants placed in extraction sockets grafted with medical grade calcium sulfate hemihydrate (MGCSH) mixed with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and a collagen resorbable plug after one year of function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This evaluation was part of a previous study conducted to evaluate extraction socket grafts. Fourteen subjects out of 16 were evaluated. After tooth extraction, eight subjects received MGCSH mixed with PRP in the extraction sockets (test group), and six subjects received collagen resorbable plug dressing material (control group). After three months of bone healing, dental implants were placed. Three months after implant installation, provisional restorations were placed and implants were loaded in function for one month followed by definitive restorations. Follow-up examinations and intraoral digital radiographs were made at baseline and one year after definitive restorations to evaluate the marginal bone level in each subject.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the one-year follow-up, the survival and success rate was 100% for all implants. There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of vertical bone loss between groups after 1 year (p > 0.05). For the test group, there was a mean mesial bone loss of -0.8 +/- 0.6mm and a mean distal bone loss of -0.5 +/- 0.4mm. For the control group, there was a mean mesial bone loss of -1.1 +/- 0.7mm and a mean distal bone loss of -0.6 +/- 0.6mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At the one-year follow-up, the implant placement in grafted sockets was not affected by the type of the graft material. Implants placed in sockets grafted with MGCSH mixed with PRP showed less marginal bone loss after one year in comparison to those with collagen resorbable grafts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and radiographic evaluation of single-tooth dental implants placed in grafted extraction sites: a one-year report.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Kutkut,&nbsp;Sebastiano Andreana,&nbsp;Edward Monaco\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this report was to clinically and radiographically evaluate changes to the hard and soft tissues around implants placed in extraction sockets grafted with medical grade calcium sulfate hemihydrate (MGCSH) mixed with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and a collagen resorbable plug after one year of function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This evaluation was part of a previous study conducted to evaluate extraction socket grafts. Fourteen subjects out of 16 were evaluated. After tooth extraction, eight subjects received MGCSH mixed with PRP in the extraction sockets (test group), and six subjects received collagen resorbable plug dressing material (control group). After three months of bone healing, dental implants were placed. Three months after implant installation, provisional restorations were placed and implants were loaded in function for one month followed by definitive restorations. Follow-up examinations and intraoral digital radiographs were made at baseline and one year after definitive restorations to evaluate the marginal bone level in each subject.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the one-year follow-up, the survival and success rate was 100% for all implants. There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of vertical bone loss between groups after 1 year (p > 0.05). For the test group, there was a mean mesial bone loss of -0.8 +/- 0.6mm and a mean distal bone loss of -0.5 +/- 0.4mm. For the control group, there was a mean mesial bone loss of -1.1 +/- 0.7mm and a mean distal bone loss of -0.6 +/- 0.6mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At the one-year follow-up, the implant placement in grafted sockets was not affected by the type of the graft material. Implants placed in sockets grafted with MGCSH mixed with PRP showed less marginal bone loss after one year in comparison to those with collagen resorbable grafts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本报告的目的是临床和放射学评估植入医用级半水合硫酸钙(MGCSH)混合富血小板血浆(PRP)和胶原可吸收塞的拔牙槽内植入物周围硬软组织的变化。方法:该评估是先前评估拔牙槽移植物研究的一部分。对16名受试者中的14名进行了评估。拔牙后,8例患者在拔牙槽内使用MGCSH混合PRP(试验组),6例患者使用胶原可吸收塞敷料(对照组)。骨愈合三个月后,植入牙种植体。种植体安装3个月后,放置临时修复体,植入体加载功能一个月,然后进行最终修复。随访检查和口内数字x线片分别在基线和确定修复后一年进行,以评估每个受试者的边缘骨水平。结果:随访1年,所有种植体的成活率和成功率均为100%。1年后各组垂直骨丢失量比较,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。实验组中,平均近端骨丢失-0.8 +/- 0.6mm,平均远端骨丢失-0.5 +/- 0.4mm。对于对照组,平均近端骨丢失为-1.1 +/- 0.7mm,平均远端骨丢失为-0.6 +/- 0.6mm。结论:在1年的随访中,种植体在种植槽内的放置不受移植物材料类型的影响。与可吸收胶原的移植物相比,MGCSH混合PRP植入一年后的骨损失更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of single-tooth dental implants placed in grafted extraction sites: a one-year report.

Objective: The aim of this report was to clinically and radiographically evaluate changes to the hard and soft tissues around implants placed in extraction sockets grafted with medical grade calcium sulfate hemihydrate (MGCSH) mixed with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and a collagen resorbable plug after one year of function.

Methods: This evaluation was part of a previous study conducted to evaluate extraction socket grafts. Fourteen subjects out of 16 were evaluated. After tooth extraction, eight subjects received MGCSH mixed with PRP in the extraction sockets (test group), and six subjects received collagen resorbable plug dressing material (control group). After three months of bone healing, dental implants were placed. Three months after implant installation, provisional restorations were placed and implants were loaded in function for one month followed by definitive restorations. Follow-up examinations and intraoral digital radiographs were made at baseline and one year after definitive restorations to evaluate the marginal bone level in each subject.

Results: At the one-year follow-up, the survival and success rate was 100% for all implants. There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of vertical bone loss between groups after 1 year (p > 0.05). For the test group, there was a mean mesial bone loss of -0.8 +/- 0.6mm and a mean distal bone loss of -0.5 +/- 0.4mm. For the control group, there was a mean mesial bone loss of -1.1 +/- 0.7mm and a mean distal bone loss of -0.6 +/- 0.6mm.

Conclusions: At the one-year follow-up, the implant placement in grafted sockets was not affected by the type of the graft material. Implants placed in sockets grafted with MGCSH mixed with PRP showed less marginal bone loss after one year in comparison to those with collagen resorbable grafts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Periodontal status in cannabis smokers. A systematic review. Impact of Subepithelial Connective Tissue for Root Coverage on Brazilian Patients' Quality of Life: A Longitudinal Clinical Study. Coefficient of variation of red cell distribution width has correlations to periodontal inflamed surface area in non-obese hypertensive patients. Immediate implant placement in periodontally infected sites- A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chitosan-based biomaterial and hyaluronic acid on the repair of intrabuccal bone defects in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1