与PlusoptiX A09光电筛检器比较弱视危险因素的挂图视力筛检,由外行筛检者进行的测试。

David I Silbert, Noelle S Matta, Abby Brubaker
{"title":"与PlusoptiX A09光电筛检器比较弱视危险因素的挂图视力筛检,由外行筛检者进行的测试。","authors":"David I Silbert,&nbsp;Noelle S Matta,&nbsp;Abby Brubaker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The gold standard of vision screening is considered acuity testing, this article will compare the gold standard against new technology to provide more choices for pediatric vision screening programs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the reliability of recognition visual acuity screening performed by a lay screener compared to the plusoptiX A09 photoscreener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>One lay screener received basic training in how to test monocular visual acuity using the 10 foot Patti Pics single crowded chart and the plusoptiX A09 photoscreener. All children underwent a complete pediatric ophthalmology examination and cycloplegic refraction after screening and this examination was the standard against which the screening method was compared. Each patient received a pass or refer grade after either screening. For the Patti Pics screening, children were referred if they failed to reach threshold visual acuity of twenty forty in either eye; the plusoptiX determines if the child is a pass or refer based on pre-set referral criteria.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pediatric ophthalmology clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Screening was performed on children ages 3 to 10 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one children were screened. Flip chart-screening was found to have a sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 44%, false positive rate of 56% and false negative rate of 17%. Those same metrics for the plusoptiX A09 were 94%, 89%, 11% and 6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The plusoptiX photoscreener was more sensitive and specific in making appropriate referrals for further care than flip chart-screening in this cohort of children age 3-10. The plusoptiX A09 photoscreener operated by a lay screener is a reliable method to screen for amblyopia risk factors. These finding have important implications for community based vision screening, and screening in the medical home.</p>","PeriodicalId":72356,"journal":{"name":"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flip chart Visual Acuity Screening for Amblyopia Risk Factors Compared to the PlusoptiX A09 Photoscreener,Tests Performed by a Lay Screener.\",\"authors\":\"David I Silbert,&nbsp;Noelle S Matta,&nbsp;Abby Brubaker\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The gold standard of vision screening is considered acuity testing, this article will compare the gold standard against new technology to provide more choices for pediatric vision screening programs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the reliability of recognition visual acuity screening performed by a lay screener compared to the plusoptiX A09 photoscreener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>One lay screener received basic training in how to test monocular visual acuity using the 10 foot Patti Pics single crowded chart and the plusoptiX A09 photoscreener. All children underwent a complete pediatric ophthalmology examination and cycloplegic refraction after screening and this examination was the standard against which the screening method was compared. Each patient received a pass or refer grade after either screening. For the Patti Pics screening, children were referred if they failed to reach threshold visual acuity of twenty forty in either eye; the plusoptiX determines if the child is a pass or refer based on pre-set referral criteria.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pediatric ophthalmology clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Screening was performed on children ages 3 to 10 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one children were screened. Flip chart-screening was found to have a sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 44%, false positive rate of 56% and false negative rate of 17%. Those same metrics for the plusoptiX A09 were 94%, 89%, 11% and 6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The plusoptiX photoscreener was more sensitive and specific in making appropriate referrals for further care than flip chart-screening in this cohort of children age 3-10. The plusoptiX A09 photoscreener operated by a lay screener is a reliable method to screen for amblyopia risk factors. These finding have important implications for community based vision screening, and screening in the medical home.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:视力筛查的黄金标准被认为是视力测试,本文将黄金标准与新技术进行比较,为儿童视力筛查方案提供更多选择。目的:比较普通筛检器与plusoptiX A09光筛检器识别弱视危险因素的可靠性。设计:一名普通筛检员接受了如何使用10英尺Patti Pics单拥挤表和plusoptiX A09光电筛检仪测试单眼视力的基本培训。所有儿童筛查后均接受完整的儿童眼科检查和单眼麻痹性屈光检查,并以此作为筛查方法比较的标准。每位患者在筛查后均获得及格或转诊评分。对于Patti Pics筛查,如果儿童的任何一只眼睛的视力都没有达到阈值240,就会被转诊;plusoptiX根据预先设定的转诊标准确定孩子是合格还是转诊。单位:小儿眼科门诊。参与者:筛查对象为3至10岁的儿童。结果:筛查了71名儿童。翻图筛查的敏感性为83%,特异性为44%,假阳性率为56%,假阴性率为17%。plusoptiX A09的相同指标分别为94%、89%、11%和6%。结论:在这组3-10岁的儿童中,plusoptiX照相筛检比挂图筛检更敏感、更具体,更适合转介进一步护理。plusoptiX A09光筛是一种可靠的弱视危险因素筛查方法。这些发现对社区视力筛查和家庭医疗筛查具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flip chart Visual Acuity Screening for Amblyopia Risk Factors Compared to the PlusoptiX A09 Photoscreener,Tests Performed by a Lay Screener.

Importance: The gold standard of vision screening is considered acuity testing, this article will compare the gold standard against new technology to provide more choices for pediatric vision screening programs.

Objective: To determine the reliability of recognition visual acuity screening performed by a lay screener compared to the plusoptiX A09 photoscreener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors.

Design: One lay screener received basic training in how to test monocular visual acuity using the 10 foot Patti Pics single crowded chart and the plusoptiX A09 photoscreener. All children underwent a complete pediatric ophthalmology examination and cycloplegic refraction after screening and this examination was the standard against which the screening method was compared. Each patient received a pass or refer grade after either screening. For the Patti Pics screening, children were referred if they failed to reach threshold visual acuity of twenty forty in either eye; the plusoptiX determines if the child is a pass or refer based on pre-set referral criteria.

Setting: Pediatric ophthalmology clinic.

Participants: Screening was performed on children ages 3 to 10 years.

Results: Seventy-one children were screened. Flip chart-screening was found to have a sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 44%, false positive rate of 56% and false negative rate of 17%. Those same metrics for the plusoptiX A09 were 94%, 89%, 11% and 6%, respectively.

Conclusion: The plusoptiX photoscreener was more sensitive and specific in making appropriate referrals for further care than flip chart-screening in this cohort of children age 3-10. The plusoptiX A09 photoscreener operated by a lay screener is a reliable method to screen for amblyopia risk factors. These finding have important implications for community based vision screening, and screening in the medical home.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pediatric photoscreeners in high risk patients 2012: a comparison study of Plusoptix, Iscreen and SPOT. Near Point of Accommodation and Convergence after Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) for Myopia. Retinitis pigmentosa and granular dystrophy: a rare and unique combination in one patient. Effects of atropine on the accommodative system: parameters to consider in its use for penalization treatment of amblyopia. 3D Printing Live Stem Cells; Hobbit in 3D; Super "Retina Displya"; Your Microbiome; Hospitals Takeover; Income Taxes; Bicyclists; Deer Dangers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1