儿童屈肌腱损伤:10年结果分析。

Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1177/229255031302100304
Sheena Sikora, Michelle Lai, Jugpal S Arneja
{"title":"儿童屈肌腱损伤:10年结果分析。","authors":"Sheena Sikora,&nbsp;Michelle Lai,&nbsp;Jugpal S Arneja","doi":"10.1177/229255031302100304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary flexor tendon repair was first introduced in the 1960s. Since then, major advances in the understanding of flexor tendon anatomy and biology have led to improved outcomes following repair. Relative to the adult population, sparse knowledge exists as to which operative and postoperative treatments are most successful in children. This is due, in part, to the rarity of pediatric tendon lacerations compared with the adult population, but also related to challenges when working with smaller anatomy and the decreased compliance in children with respect to rehabilitation protocols. Published reports indicate that the incidence of 'good' flexor tendon repair outcomes is as low as 53%.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the injury pattern and demographics of pediatric flexor tendon injuries involving zones I, II and III over the past decade, and to report results and identify treatment paradigms that are associated with optimal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all flexor tendon injuries involving zones I, II and III between April 2001 and December 2010 was performed. Parameters reviewed included demographics, injury mechanism, repair technique, outcomes and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients with a median age of eight years experienced 100 tendon injuries. The most common cause of injury was glass (n=22), with the most common digit injured being the small finger (n=30). Tendon injuries included the following: flexor digitorum superficialis (n=46); flexor digitorum profundus (n=45), flexor pollicis longus (n=8); and adductor pollicis longus (n=1). Zone III had the highest number of injuries (n=47), followed by zone II (n=39). Ninety tendons were repaired using polyester suture, the most common size being 4-0. The modified Kessler technique was used in the majority of cases (n=62). Only 22 tendons underwent an epitendinous repair. Splint immobilization was used in 30 patients and a full cast in 17. The median duration of immobilization was four weeks. Forty-two patients underwent postoperative hand therapy. Using the American Society for Surgery of the Hand Total Active Motion (TAM) score, 40 of 47 patients experienced 100% recovery with no functional limitations. Two patients had a score <100%, not necessitating further surgery. A second operation was required for five patients. All patients in this group demonstrated 100% TAM at one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric flexor tendon injuries remain rare and usually involve the dominant hand holding or manipulating an object. An excellent outcome was found in 95.9% of patients assessed by TAM scores. Repair technique was chosen according to the size of tendon involved. Patients not treated with hand therapy and not immobilized in a cast were often too young to participate in rehabilitation. Based on the results, immobilization of young children for four weeks is safe and does not worsen functional outcomes. Of the patients requiring a second procedure, no predictive variables for poorer outcomes were found on analysis of age, outcome, cause, location, repair technique, rehabilitation protocol or zone of injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"21 3","pages":"181-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/229255031302100304","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric flexor tendon injuries: A 10-year outcome analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sheena Sikora,&nbsp;Michelle Lai,&nbsp;Jugpal S Arneja\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/229255031302100304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary flexor tendon repair was first introduced in the 1960s. Since then, major advances in the understanding of flexor tendon anatomy and biology have led to improved outcomes following repair. Relative to the adult population, sparse knowledge exists as to which operative and postoperative treatments are most successful in children. This is due, in part, to the rarity of pediatric tendon lacerations compared with the adult population, but also related to challenges when working with smaller anatomy and the decreased compliance in children with respect to rehabilitation protocols. Published reports indicate that the incidence of 'good' flexor tendon repair outcomes is as low as 53%.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the injury pattern and demographics of pediatric flexor tendon injuries involving zones I, II and III over the past decade, and to report results and identify treatment paradigms that are associated with optimal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all flexor tendon injuries involving zones I, II and III between April 2001 and December 2010 was performed. Parameters reviewed included demographics, injury mechanism, repair technique, outcomes and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients with a median age of eight years experienced 100 tendon injuries. The most common cause of injury was glass (n=22), with the most common digit injured being the small finger (n=30). Tendon injuries included the following: flexor digitorum superficialis (n=46); flexor digitorum profundus (n=45), flexor pollicis longus (n=8); and adductor pollicis longus (n=1). Zone III had the highest number of injuries (n=47), followed by zone II (n=39). Ninety tendons were repaired using polyester suture, the most common size being 4-0. The modified Kessler technique was used in the majority of cases (n=62). Only 22 tendons underwent an epitendinous repair. Splint immobilization was used in 30 patients and a full cast in 17. The median duration of immobilization was four weeks. Forty-two patients underwent postoperative hand therapy. Using the American Society for Surgery of the Hand Total Active Motion (TAM) score, 40 of 47 patients experienced 100% recovery with no functional limitations. Two patients had a score <100%, not necessitating further surgery. A second operation was required for five patients. All patients in this group demonstrated 100% TAM at one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric flexor tendon injuries remain rare and usually involve the dominant hand holding or manipulating an object. An excellent outcome was found in 95.9% of patients assessed by TAM scores. Repair technique was chosen according to the size of tendon involved. Patients not treated with hand therapy and not immobilized in a cast were often too young to participate in rehabilitation. Based on the results, immobilization of young children for four weeks is safe and does not worsen functional outcomes. Of the patients requiring a second procedure, no predictive variables for poorer outcomes were found on analysis of age, outcome, cause, location, repair technique, rehabilitation protocol or zone of injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"181-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/229255031302100304\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031302100304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031302100304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

背景:初级屈肌腱修复术在20世纪60年代首次被引入。从那时起,屈肌腱解剖学和生物学的理解取得了重大进展,导致修复后的预后得到改善。相对于成人人群,关于哪些手术和术后治疗在儿童中最成功的知识很少。这在一定程度上是由于与成人相比,儿童肌腱撕裂的发生率较低,但也与处理较小的解剖结构时的挑战以及儿童对康复方案的依从性降低有关。已发表的报告表明,屈肌腱修复“良好”的发生率低至53%。目的:确定过去十年中涉及I、II和III区的儿童屈肌腱损伤的损伤模式和人口统计学特征,并报告结果并确定与最佳结果相关的治疗模式。方法:回顾性分析2001年4月至2010年12月期间所有涉及I、II和III区屈肌腱损伤的图表。评估的参数包括人口统计学、损伤机制、修复技术、结果和并发症。结果:共有47例患者,中位年龄为8岁,经历了100次肌腱损伤。最常见的损伤原因是玻璃(n=22),最常见的手指损伤是小指(n=30)。肌腱损伤包括:指浅屈肌(n=46);指深屈肌(n=45),拇长屈肌(n=8);和拇长内收肌(n=1)。损伤最多的是III区(n=47),其次是II区(n=39)。90根肌腱采用涤纶缝线修复,最常见的尺寸为4-0。大多数病例采用改良的Kessler技术(n=62)。只有22条肌腱进行了肌腱外延修复。30例采用夹板固定,17例采用全石膏固定。固定时间中位数为四周。42例患者术后接受手部治疗。使用美国手外科学会的总主动运动(TAM)评分,47例患者中有40例100%恢复,无功能限制。结论:小儿屈肌腱损伤仍然罕见,通常涉及优势手握住或操纵物体。95.9%的患者通过TAM评分获得了良好的预后。根据受累肌腱的大小选择修复方法。未接受手部治疗和未使用石膏固定的患者通常年龄太小,无法参与康复治疗。根据结果,幼儿固定四周是安全的,不会使功能结果恶化。在需要第二次手术的患者中,在分析年龄、结果、原因、位置、修复技术、康复方案或损伤区域时,没有发现较差结果的预测变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Pediatric flexor tendon injuries: A 10-year outcome analysis.

Background: Primary flexor tendon repair was first introduced in the 1960s. Since then, major advances in the understanding of flexor tendon anatomy and biology have led to improved outcomes following repair. Relative to the adult population, sparse knowledge exists as to which operative and postoperative treatments are most successful in children. This is due, in part, to the rarity of pediatric tendon lacerations compared with the adult population, but also related to challenges when working with smaller anatomy and the decreased compliance in children with respect to rehabilitation protocols. Published reports indicate that the incidence of 'good' flexor tendon repair outcomes is as low as 53%.

Objective: To determine the injury pattern and demographics of pediatric flexor tendon injuries involving zones I, II and III over the past decade, and to report results and identify treatment paradigms that are associated with optimal outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all flexor tendon injuries involving zones I, II and III between April 2001 and December 2010 was performed. Parameters reviewed included demographics, injury mechanism, repair technique, outcomes and complications.

Results: A total of 47 patients with a median age of eight years experienced 100 tendon injuries. The most common cause of injury was glass (n=22), with the most common digit injured being the small finger (n=30). Tendon injuries included the following: flexor digitorum superficialis (n=46); flexor digitorum profundus (n=45), flexor pollicis longus (n=8); and adductor pollicis longus (n=1). Zone III had the highest number of injuries (n=47), followed by zone II (n=39). Ninety tendons were repaired using polyester suture, the most common size being 4-0. The modified Kessler technique was used in the majority of cases (n=62). Only 22 tendons underwent an epitendinous repair. Splint immobilization was used in 30 patients and a full cast in 17. The median duration of immobilization was four weeks. Forty-two patients underwent postoperative hand therapy. Using the American Society for Surgery of the Hand Total Active Motion (TAM) score, 40 of 47 patients experienced 100% recovery with no functional limitations. Two patients had a score <100%, not necessitating further surgery. A second operation was required for five patients. All patients in this group demonstrated 100% TAM at one year.

Conclusion: Pediatric flexor tendon injuries remain rare and usually involve the dominant hand holding or manipulating an object. An excellent outcome was found in 95.9% of patients assessed by TAM scores. Repair technique was chosen according to the size of tendon involved. Patients not treated with hand therapy and not immobilized in a cast were often too young to participate in rehabilitation. Based on the results, immobilization of young children for four weeks is safe and does not worsen functional outcomes. Of the patients requiring a second procedure, no predictive variables for poorer outcomes were found on analysis of age, outcome, cause, location, repair technique, rehabilitation protocol or zone of injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1