放射引起的乳房美学结果的差异:对扩张器-植入物重建的有效定量分析。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q Medicine Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1177/229255031302100206
Lauren M Mioton, Jessica Gaido, William Small, Neil A Fine, John Y Kim
{"title":"放射引起的乳房美学结果的差异:对扩张器-植入物重建的有效定量分析。","authors":"Lauren M Mioton,&nbsp;Jessica Gaido,&nbsp;William Small,&nbsp;Neil A Fine,&nbsp;John Y Kim","doi":"10.1177/229255031302100206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential ramifications of radiation use can be of particular concern in the breast reconstruction population, in which both surgical and aesthetic outcomes are important. Presently, there remains a paucity of data detailing the influence of radiation on specific reconstruction aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a quantitative evaluation of aesthetic outcomes for expander-implant breast reconstruction in radiated and nonradiated patients using a validated scoring scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of consecutive expander-implant breast reconstruction operations performed by the senior author between 2004 and 2012 were reviewed. Four blinded members of the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Northwestern University (Illinois, USA) independently rated postoperative photographs of patients' breasts using a validated scoring scale with respect to five distinct aesthetic domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 206 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 69 received radiotherapy and 137 did not. The radiated cohort had lower scores in each aesthetic domain, with significant differences in contour (1.33 versus 1.51; P=0.041) and placement (1.45 versus 1.73; P<0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between placement scores and radiation, and radiated patients had a significantly higher overall rate of complications.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Variances in scores may represent the relative difficulty of expansions and proper implant placement in irradiated tissue, with possible skin fibrosis and decreased flexibility hindering prosthesis manipulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiation adversely impacts breast contour and placement, with possible negative contributions to volume, scarring and inframammary fold definition, and results in higher rates of complications. Such detailed evaluation of the impact of radiation on aesthetics will enhance the management of patient expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/229255031302100206","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in breast aesthetic outcomes due to radiation: A validated, quantitative analysis of expander-implant reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren M Mioton,&nbsp;Jessica Gaido,&nbsp;William Small,&nbsp;Neil A Fine,&nbsp;John Y Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/229255031302100206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential ramifications of radiation use can be of particular concern in the breast reconstruction population, in which both surgical and aesthetic outcomes are important. Presently, there remains a paucity of data detailing the influence of radiation on specific reconstruction aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a quantitative evaluation of aesthetic outcomes for expander-implant breast reconstruction in radiated and nonradiated patients using a validated scoring scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of consecutive expander-implant breast reconstruction operations performed by the senior author between 2004 and 2012 were reviewed. Four blinded members of the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Northwestern University (Illinois, USA) independently rated postoperative photographs of patients' breasts using a validated scoring scale with respect to five distinct aesthetic domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 206 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 69 received radiotherapy and 137 did not. The radiated cohort had lower scores in each aesthetic domain, with significant differences in contour (1.33 versus 1.51; P=0.041) and placement (1.45 versus 1.73; P<0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between placement scores and radiation, and radiated patients had a significantly higher overall rate of complications.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Variances in scores may represent the relative difficulty of expansions and proper implant placement in irradiated tissue, with possible skin fibrosis and decreased flexibility hindering prosthesis manipulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiation adversely impacts breast contour and placement, with possible negative contributions to volume, scarring and inframammary fold definition, and results in higher rates of complications. Such detailed evaluation of the impact of radiation on aesthetics will enhance the management of patient expectations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/229255031302100206\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031302100206\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031302100206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:在乳房重建人群中,辐射使用的潜在后果可能是一个特别关注的问题,在这个人群中,手术和美学结果都很重要。目前,仍然缺乏详细的数据,辐射对具体重建美学结果的影响。目的:采用一种有效的评分量表,对放射和非放射患者进行乳房扩张器植入重建的美学效果进行定量评价。方法:回顾资深作者2004 ~ 2012年连续进行的一系列扩张器-假体乳房重建手术。美国西北大学(Illinois, USA)整形与重建外科的四名盲眼研究人员对患者乳房的术后照片进行了独立评分,使用了一个有效的评分量表,涉及五个不同的美学领域。结果:206例符合纳入标准的患者中,69例接受放疗,137例未接受放疗。放射组在每个美学领域得分较低,在轮廓上有显著差异(1.33比1.51;P=0.041)和位置(1.45 vs 1.73;讨论:评分的差异可能代表了在辐照组织中扩张和适当植入假体的相对困难,可能的皮肤纤维化和灵活性降低阻碍了假体的操作。结论:放疗对乳房轮廓和位置有不利影响,可能对乳房体积、疤痕和乳下褶皱的定义有负面影响,并导致更高的并发症发生率。这样详细的评估放射对美学的影响将提高病人期望的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in breast aesthetic outcomes due to radiation: A validated, quantitative analysis of expander-implant reconstruction.

Background: The potential ramifications of radiation use can be of particular concern in the breast reconstruction population, in which both surgical and aesthetic outcomes are important. Presently, there remains a paucity of data detailing the influence of radiation on specific reconstruction aesthetic outcomes.

Objective: To conduct a quantitative evaluation of aesthetic outcomes for expander-implant breast reconstruction in radiated and nonradiated patients using a validated scoring scale.

Methods: A series of consecutive expander-implant breast reconstruction operations performed by the senior author between 2004 and 2012 were reviewed. Four blinded members of the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Northwestern University (Illinois, USA) independently rated postoperative photographs of patients' breasts using a validated scoring scale with respect to five distinct aesthetic domains.

Results: Of the 206 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 69 received radiotherapy and 137 did not. The radiated cohort had lower scores in each aesthetic domain, with significant differences in contour (1.33 versus 1.51; P=0.041) and placement (1.45 versus 1.73; P<0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between placement scores and radiation, and radiated patients had a significantly higher overall rate of complications.

Discussion: Variances in scores may represent the relative difficulty of expansions and proper implant placement in irradiated tissue, with possible skin fibrosis and decreased flexibility hindering prosthesis manipulation.

Conclusion: Radiation adversely impacts breast contour and placement, with possible negative contributions to volume, scarring and inframammary fold definition, and results in higher rates of complications. Such detailed evaluation of the impact of radiation on aesthetics will enhance the management of patient expectations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic Surgery
Plastic Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
0.67
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
期刊最新文献
Accessibility and Insurance Coverage for Gender-affirming Surgery in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Donor Site Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP Flap: A Retrospective and Prospective Study in a Single Institution Commentary: Current Practices and Trends of Plastic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in Canada Commentary: Instagram Practices of Successful Plastic Surgeon Accounts: Is There a Magic Formula? Out-of-Pocket Costs and Physician Payment Variations in Abdominal Contouring: Evidence From United States Claims Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1