加拿大烧伤中心吸入性损伤诊断和干预措施的当前实践调查。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q Medicine Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Justin K Yeung, Leslie Tze Fung Leung, Anthony Papp
{"title":"加拿大烧伤中心吸入性损伤诊断和干预措施的当前实践调查。","authors":"Justin K Yeung,&nbsp;Leslie Tze Fung Leung,&nbsp;Anthony Papp","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize current Canadian practice patterns in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhalation injuries (INHI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 10-question survey regarding the diagnosis of and interventions for INHI was sent to the medical directors of all 16 burn centres across Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate to the survey was 50%. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is required for the diagnosis of INHI in only four centres (50%). The departments of intensive care, plastic surgery, otolaryngology and respirology are involved in performing fibreoptic bronchoscopy in 87.5%, 37.5%, 12.5% and 12.5% of Canadian burn centres, respectively. Intubation for INHI is most often based on physical examination results (87.5%) and clinical history (75%). The most common physical features believed to be most consistent with INHI are dyspnea (87.5%) and hoarseness (87.5%). Common treatments include intubation (87.5%), routine ventilatory support (87.5%) and chest physiotherapy (75%). None of the centres used nebulized heparin. A total of five centres (62.5%) routinely changed the fluid resuscitation protocol when INHI was diagnosed. Only two centres (25%) routinely used prophylactic antibiotics for INHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prospective, multicentre trials are needed to generate evidence-based consensus in the areas of diagnosis, grading and treatment for INHI in Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910522/pdf/cjps21221.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of current practices in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhalational injuries in Canadian burn centres.\",\"authors\":\"Justin K Yeung,&nbsp;Leslie Tze Fung Leung,&nbsp;Anthony Papp\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize current Canadian practice patterns in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhalation injuries (INHI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 10-question survey regarding the diagnosis of and interventions for INHI was sent to the medical directors of all 16 burn centres across Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate to the survey was 50%. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is required for the diagnosis of INHI in only four centres (50%). The departments of intensive care, plastic surgery, otolaryngology and respirology are involved in performing fibreoptic bronchoscopy in 87.5%, 37.5%, 12.5% and 12.5% of Canadian burn centres, respectively. Intubation for INHI is most often based on physical examination results (87.5%) and clinical history (75%). The most common physical features believed to be most consistent with INHI are dyspnea (87.5%) and hoarseness (87.5%). Common treatments include intubation (87.5%), routine ventilatory support (87.5%) and chest physiotherapy (75%). None of the centres used nebulized heparin. A total of five centres (62.5%) routinely changed the fluid resuscitation protocol when INHI was diagnosed. Only two centres (25%) routinely used prophylactic antibiotics for INHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prospective, multicentre trials are needed to generate evidence-based consensus in the areas of diagnosis, grading and treatment for INHI in Canada.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910522/pdf/cjps21221.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:总结目前加拿大在吸入性损伤(INHI)诊断和干预方面的实践模式。方法:向加拿大所有16个烧伤中心的医学主任发送了一份关于INHI诊断和干预措施的10个问题的调查。结果:调查回复率为50%。只有4个中心(50%)需要纤维支气管镜检查诊断INHI。重症监护室、整形外科、耳鼻喉科和呼吸科分别在87.5%、37.5%、12.5%和12.5%的加拿大烧伤中心进行纤维支气管镜检查。INHI的插管通常基于体格检查结果(87.5%)和临床病史(75%)。与INHI最一致的最常见的身体特征是呼吸困难(87.5%)和声音嘶哑(87.5%)。常见的治疗包括插管(87.5%)、常规通气支持(87.5%)和胸部物理治疗(75%)。没有一个中心使用雾化肝素。确诊INHI后,共有5个中心(62.5%)常规改变了液体复苏方案。只有两个中心(25%)常规使用INHI预防性抗生素。结论:需要前瞻性、多中心试验来在加拿大INHI的诊断、分级和治疗方面达成基于证据的共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey of current practices in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhalational injuries in Canadian burn centres.

Objective: To summarize current Canadian practice patterns in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhalation injuries (INHI).

Methods: A 10-question survey regarding the diagnosis of and interventions for INHI was sent to the medical directors of all 16 burn centres across Canada.

Results: The response rate to the survey was 50%. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is required for the diagnosis of INHI in only four centres (50%). The departments of intensive care, plastic surgery, otolaryngology and respirology are involved in performing fibreoptic bronchoscopy in 87.5%, 37.5%, 12.5% and 12.5% of Canadian burn centres, respectively. Intubation for INHI is most often based on physical examination results (87.5%) and clinical history (75%). The most common physical features believed to be most consistent with INHI are dyspnea (87.5%) and hoarseness (87.5%). Common treatments include intubation (87.5%), routine ventilatory support (87.5%) and chest physiotherapy (75%). None of the centres used nebulized heparin. A total of five centres (62.5%) routinely changed the fluid resuscitation protocol when INHI was diagnosed. Only two centres (25%) routinely used prophylactic antibiotics for INHI.

Conclusion: Prospective, multicentre trials are needed to generate evidence-based consensus in the areas of diagnosis, grading and treatment for INHI in Canada.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic Surgery
Plastic Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
0.67
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
期刊最新文献
Accessibility and Insurance Coverage for Gender-affirming Surgery in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Donor Site Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP Flap: A Retrospective and Prospective Study in a Single Institution Commentary: Current Practices and Trends of Plastic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in Canada Commentary: Instagram Practices of Successful Plastic Surgeon Accounts: Is There a Magic Formula? Out-of-Pocket Costs and Physician Payment Variations in Abdominal Contouring: Evidence From United States Claims Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1