Alejandro Caro Pérez, Sarita Kumble, Krishnanand D Kumble, M Consuelo Alonso Cañizal, Luis M Jiménez Jiménez, Lorena Alonso Díez, Pilar Durán Parejo
{"title":"多重ELISA检测自身免疫性结缔组织疾病患者自身抗体谱的评价","authors":"Alejandro Caro Pérez, Sarita Kumble, Krishnanand D Kumble, M Consuelo Alonso Cañizal, Luis M Jiménez Jiménez, Lorena Alonso Díez, Pilar Durán Parejo","doi":"10.1155/2014/896787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The performance of immunoassays for the detection of autoantibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTD). Our objective was to compare the features of two multiplexed assays-INNO-LIA ANA and Gennova-PictArray ENA ELISA-for measurement of multiple autoantibodies and their utility as a clinical tool in ACTD diagnosis. The antigens included SS-A/Ro (60 and 52), SSB/La, Sm, Sm/RNP, CENP-B, Jo-1, and Scl-70. Stored sera from 85 ACTD patients and 80 controls consisting of patients with vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis and infectious diseases, as well as healthy subjects were analyzed jointly with clinical and laboratory data. Agreement between the two methods varied between 58 and 99% (Cohen's kappa: 0.21-0.71) mostly for SSA and SSB. The frequency of specific autoantibodies measured using the two methods was more variable for SSA, SSB, and RNP/Sm. There were a higher number of ambiguous results when using INNO-LIA. The optimized cut-off values of the Gennova-PictArray resulted in over 99% specificities in samples obtained from the control group. Sensitivity patterns were more accurate in Gennova-PictArray than in INNO-LIA, as suggested in previously reported studies. A third method could be applied to determine which of the two methods is more accurate. </p>","PeriodicalId":46314,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmune Diseases","volume":"2014 ","pages":"896787"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/896787","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a multiplex ELISA for autoantibody profiling in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Caro Pérez, Sarita Kumble, Krishnanand D Kumble, M Consuelo Alonso Cañizal, Luis M Jiménez Jiménez, Lorena Alonso Díez, Pilar Durán Parejo\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/896787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The performance of immunoassays for the detection of autoantibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTD). Our objective was to compare the features of two multiplexed assays-INNO-LIA ANA and Gennova-PictArray ENA ELISA-for measurement of multiple autoantibodies and their utility as a clinical tool in ACTD diagnosis. The antigens included SS-A/Ro (60 and 52), SSB/La, Sm, Sm/RNP, CENP-B, Jo-1, and Scl-70. Stored sera from 85 ACTD patients and 80 controls consisting of patients with vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis and infectious diseases, as well as healthy subjects were analyzed jointly with clinical and laboratory data. Agreement between the two methods varied between 58 and 99% (Cohen's kappa: 0.21-0.71) mostly for SSA and SSB. The frequency of specific autoantibodies measured using the two methods was more variable for SSA, SSB, and RNP/Sm. There were a higher number of ambiguous results when using INNO-LIA. The optimized cut-off values of the Gennova-PictArray resulted in over 99% specificities in samples obtained from the control group. Sensitivity patterns were more accurate in Gennova-PictArray than in INNO-LIA, as suggested in previously reported studies. A third method could be applied to determine which of the two methods is more accurate. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autoimmune Diseases\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"896787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/896787\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autoimmune Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/896787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmune Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/896787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
检测自身抗体的免疫测定在自身免疫性结缔组织疾病(ACTD)患者的诊断和评估中具有至关重要的意义。我们的目的是比较两种多重检测方法(innoi - lia ANA和Gennova-PictArray ENA elisa)的特征,以测量多种自身抗体及其作为ACTD诊断临床工具的实用性。抗原包括SS-A/Ro(60和52)、SSB/La、Sm、Sm/RNP、CENP-B、Jo-1和Scl-70。对85例ACTD患者和80例对照(血管炎、类风湿关节炎和感染性疾病患者)及健康人的血清进行保存分析,并结合临床和实验室资料进行分析。两种方法之间的一致性在58 - 99%之间(Cohen’s kappa: 0.21-0.71),主要用于SSA和SSB。使用两种方法测量的特异性自身抗体的频率对SSA, SSB和RNP/Sm的变化更大。使用innol - lia时,歧义性结果较多。Gennova-PictArray优化的临界值在对照组获得的样品中产生了超过99%的特异性。正如先前报道的研究表明的那样,genova - pictarray的敏感性模式比ino - lia更准确。第三种方法可以用来确定两种方法中哪一种更准确。
Evaluation of a multiplex ELISA for autoantibody profiling in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases.
The performance of immunoassays for the detection of autoantibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTD). Our objective was to compare the features of two multiplexed assays-INNO-LIA ANA and Gennova-PictArray ENA ELISA-for measurement of multiple autoantibodies and their utility as a clinical tool in ACTD diagnosis. The antigens included SS-A/Ro (60 and 52), SSB/La, Sm, Sm/RNP, CENP-B, Jo-1, and Scl-70. Stored sera from 85 ACTD patients and 80 controls consisting of patients with vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis and infectious diseases, as well as healthy subjects were analyzed jointly with clinical and laboratory data. Agreement between the two methods varied between 58 and 99% (Cohen's kappa: 0.21-0.71) mostly for SSA and SSB. The frequency of specific autoantibodies measured using the two methods was more variable for SSA, SSB, and RNP/Sm. There were a higher number of ambiguous results when using INNO-LIA. The optimized cut-off values of the Gennova-PictArray resulted in over 99% specificities in samples obtained from the control group. Sensitivity patterns were more accurate in Gennova-PictArray than in INNO-LIA, as suggested in previously reported studies. A third method could be applied to determine which of the two methods is more accurate.