条件反射对大鼠异性恋和同性恋伴侣偏好的作用。

Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology Pub Date : 2012-03-15 eCollection Date: 2012-01-01 DOI:10.3402/snp.v2i0.17340
Genaro A Coria-Avila
{"title":"条件反射对大鼠异性恋和同性恋伴侣偏好的作用。","authors":"Genaro A Coria-Avila","doi":"10.3402/snp.v2i0.17340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Partner preferences are expressed by many social species, including humans. They are commonly observed as selective contacts with an individual, more time spent together, and directed courtship behavior that leads to selective copulation. This review discusses the effect of conditioning on the development of heterosexual and homosexual partner preferences in rodents. Learned preferences may develop when a conditioned stimulus (CS) is associated in contingency with an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) that functions as a reinforcer. Consequently, an individual may display preference for a partner that bears a CS. Some UCS may be more or less reinforcing, depending on when they are experienced, and may be different for males and females. For example, it could be that, only during periods of early development, that stimuli associated with nurture and juvenile play become conditioned. In adulthood, other stimuli such as sexual reward, cohabitation, mild stress, or even pharmacological manipulations may function as reinforcers to condition partner preferences. Evolutionary biologists and psychologists must take into consideration the idea that an individual's experience with reward (i.e. sexual and pharmacological) can override presumably 'innate' mate choices (e.g. assortativeness and orientation) or mate strategies (e.g. monogamy or polygamy) by means of Pavlovian and operant contingencies. In fact, it is likely as innate to learn about the environment in ways that maximize reward and minimize aversive outcomes, making so-called 'proximate' causes (e.g. pleasure) ultimately more powerful predictors of social behavior and choice than so-called 'ultimate' causes (e.g. genetic or reproductive fitness). </p>","PeriodicalId":90343,"journal":{"name":"Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology","volume":"2 ","pages":"17340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/67/66/SNP-2-17340.PMC3960032.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of conditioning on heterosexual and homosexual partner preferences in rats.\",\"authors\":\"Genaro A Coria-Avila\",\"doi\":\"10.3402/snp.v2i0.17340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Partner preferences are expressed by many social species, including humans. They are commonly observed as selective contacts with an individual, more time spent together, and directed courtship behavior that leads to selective copulation. This review discusses the effect of conditioning on the development of heterosexual and homosexual partner preferences in rodents. Learned preferences may develop when a conditioned stimulus (CS) is associated in contingency with an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) that functions as a reinforcer. Consequently, an individual may display preference for a partner that bears a CS. Some UCS may be more or less reinforcing, depending on when they are experienced, and may be different for males and females. For example, it could be that, only during periods of early development, that stimuli associated with nurture and juvenile play become conditioned. In adulthood, other stimuli such as sexual reward, cohabitation, mild stress, or even pharmacological manipulations may function as reinforcers to condition partner preferences. Evolutionary biologists and psychologists must take into consideration the idea that an individual's experience with reward (i.e. sexual and pharmacological) can override presumably 'innate' mate choices (e.g. assortativeness and orientation) or mate strategies (e.g. monogamy or polygamy) by means of Pavlovian and operant contingencies. In fact, it is likely as innate to learn about the environment in ways that maximize reward and minimize aversive outcomes, making so-called 'proximate' causes (e.g. pleasure) ultimately more powerful predictors of social behavior and choice than so-called 'ultimate' causes (e.g. genetic or reproductive fitness). </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"17340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/67/66/SNP-2-17340.PMC3960032.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3402/snp.v2i0.17340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/snp.v2i0.17340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包括人类在内的许多社会物种都会表现出对伴侣的偏好。它们通常表现为选择性地与某个个体接触、共处更多的时间以及导致选择性交配的定向求偶行为。本综述将讨论条件反射对啮齿动物异性和同性伴侣偏好发展的影响。当条件刺激(CS)与作为强化物的非条件刺激(UCS)相关联时,可能会形成习得性偏好。因此,个体可能会对带有 CS 的伴侣表现出偏好。有些非条件刺激的强化作用可能较强,也可能较弱,这取决于何时出现,而且男性和女性的非条件刺激也可能不同。例如,可能只有在早期发育阶段,与养育和少年游戏相关的刺激才会成为条件反射。成年后,其他刺激,如性奖赏、同居、轻微的压力,甚至药物治疗,都可能成为伴侣偏好的强化物。进化生物学家和心理学家必须考虑到这样一种观点,即个体对奖励(即性奖励和药理奖励)的体验可以通过巴甫洛夫和操作性条件反射的方式推翻假定的 "先天 "配偶选择(如同类性和取向)或配偶策略(如一夫一妻制或一夫多妻制)。事实上,以奖励最大化和厌恶最小化的方式了解环境很可能是与生俱来的,这使得所谓的 "近因"(如快乐)最终比所谓的 "终因"(如遗传或繁殖能力)更能预测社会行为和选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of conditioning on heterosexual and homosexual partner preferences in rats.

Partner preferences are expressed by many social species, including humans. They are commonly observed as selective contacts with an individual, more time spent together, and directed courtship behavior that leads to selective copulation. This review discusses the effect of conditioning on the development of heterosexual and homosexual partner preferences in rodents. Learned preferences may develop when a conditioned stimulus (CS) is associated in contingency with an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) that functions as a reinforcer. Consequently, an individual may display preference for a partner that bears a CS. Some UCS may be more or less reinforcing, depending on when they are experienced, and may be different for males and females. For example, it could be that, only during periods of early development, that stimuli associated with nurture and juvenile play become conditioned. In adulthood, other stimuli such as sexual reward, cohabitation, mild stress, or even pharmacological manipulations may function as reinforcers to condition partner preferences. Evolutionary biologists and psychologists must take into consideration the idea that an individual's experience with reward (i.e. sexual and pharmacological) can override presumably 'innate' mate choices (e.g. assortativeness and orientation) or mate strategies (e.g. monogamy or polygamy) by means of Pavlovian and operant contingencies. In fact, it is likely as innate to learn about the environment in ways that maximize reward and minimize aversive outcomes, making so-called 'proximate' causes (e.g. pleasure) ultimately more powerful predictors of social behavior and choice than so-called 'ultimate' causes (e.g. genetic or reproductive fitness).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Being enjoyably challenged is the key to an enjoyable gaming experience: an experimental approach in a first-person shooter game. Prospective memory evaluation in aging: new tools and methods. Is binding decline the main source of the ageing effect on prospective memory? A ride in a virtual town. Testing the mate-choice hypothesis of the female orgasm: disentangling traits and behaviours. Do rats have orgasms?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1