Paul R Bock, Jürgen Hanisch, Harald Matthes, Kurt S Zänker
{"title":"针对癌症相关疲劳的炎症:槲寄生治疗作为结直肠癌患者支持治疗的基本原理。","authors":"Paul R Bock, Jürgen Hanisch, Harald Matthes, Kurt S Zänker","doi":"10.2174/1871528113666140428103332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) affects a majority of patients (pts) with symptoms lasting up to several years after finishing therapy. These symptoms lead to decreased health related quality of life. Fatigue during treatment for colorectal cancer is common, but poorly understood and can affect compliance with post-surgical cancer therapy. We examined the fatigue levels during first-line chemo- or radio-chemotherapy protocols, which were supported by a pharmaceutical mistletoe preparation (Iscador(®)Qu) (181patients). We compared the outcome to a parallel control group (143 patients), which did not receive this supportive care treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of 324 patients with non-metastasized colorectal cancer (UICC stage I-III), which were obtained from hospitals and resident physicians, were assessed. The documented treatment decision by chemo- or radio-chemotherapy supported by mistletoe interventions was followed for a median treatment period of 8.6 months. During the post-surgical treatment period the patients were diagnosed twice for the presence of fatigue symptoms by structural interviews carried out by physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the median treatment period, 16/181 patients (8.8%) were diagnosed with CRF in the supportive care group and 86/143 (60.1%) in the chemo- or radio-chemotherapy group without supportive mistletoe medication. Multivariable-adjusted ORs provided evidence for a chance to improve CRF by supportive mistletoe medication compared to chemo- or radio-chemotherapy alone over the time of treatment. The OR = 10.651 (95% CI 5.09-22.28; p < 0.001) declined from the first visit to OR = 0.054 (95 CI 0.02-0.13; p < 0.001) at the end of therapy. Furthermore, 14 confounding factors for risk assessment of CRF were compared by means of forest plots. It turned out that the hospital versus office-based treatment and the co-morbidity/inflammation represent independent but important determinants for fatigue levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinically used mistletoe medication (Iscador(®)Qu) is the first candidate to be included in a supportive care modus into chemo- or chemo-radiotherapy protocols for colorectal patients to improve CRF without discernable toxicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13680,"journal":{"name":"Inflammation & allergy drug targets","volume":"13 2","pages":"105-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1871528113666140428103332","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeting inflammation in cancer-related-fatigue: a rationale for mistletoe therapy as supportive care in colorectal cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Paul R Bock, Jürgen Hanisch, Harald Matthes, Kurt S Zänker\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1871528113666140428103332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) affects a majority of patients (pts) with symptoms lasting up to several years after finishing therapy. These symptoms lead to decreased health related quality of life. Fatigue during treatment for colorectal cancer is common, but poorly understood and can affect compliance with post-surgical cancer therapy. We examined the fatigue levels during first-line chemo- or radio-chemotherapy protocols, which were supported by a pharmaceutical mistletoe preparation (Iscador(®)Qu) (181patients). We compared the outcome to a parallel control group (143 patients), which did not receive this supportive care treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of 324 patients with non-metastasized colorectal cancer (UICC stage I-III), which were obtained from hospitals and resident physicians, were assessed. The documented treatment decision by chemo- or radio-chemotherapy supported by mistletoe interventions was followed for a median treatment period of 8.6 months. During the post-surgical treatment period the patients were diagnosed twice for the presence of fatigue symptoms by structural interviews carried out by physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the median treatment period, 16/181 patients (8.8%) were diagnosed with CRF in the supportive care group and 86/143 (60.1%) in the chemo- or radio-chemotherapy group without supportive mistletoe medication. Multivariable-adjusted ORs provided evidence for a chance to improve CRF by supportive mistletoe medication compared to chemo- or radio-chemotherapy alone over the time of treatment. The OR = 10.651 (95% CI 5.09-22.28; p < 0.001) declined from the first visit to OR = 0.054 (95 CI 0.02-0.13; p < 0.001) at the end of therapy. Furthermore, 14 confounding factors for risk assessment of CRF were compared by means of forest plots. It turned out that the hospital versus office-based treatment and the co-morbidity/inflammation represent independent but important determinants for fatigue levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinically used mistletoe medication (Iscador(®)Qu) is the first candidate to be included in a supportive care modus into chemo- or chemo-radiotherapy protocols for colorectal patients to improve CRF without discernable toxicities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammation & allergy drug targets\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"105-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1871528113666140428103332\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammation & allergy drug targets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871528113666140428103332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammation & allergy drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871528113666140428103332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34
摘要
背景:癌症相关性疲劳(CRF)影响大多数患者,其症状在治疗结束后持续数年。这些症状导致与健康相关的生活质量下降。结直肠癌治疗期间的疲劳是常见的,但人们对其了解甚少,并可能影响术后癌症治疗的依从性。我们检查了一线化疗或放化疗方案期间的疲劳水平,这些方案由槲寄生药物制剂(Iscador(®)Qu)支持(181例患者)。我们将结果与未接受这种支持治疗的平行对照组(143例患者)进行比较。方法:对324例来自医院和住院医师的非转移性结直肠癌(UICC期I-III期)患者的病历进行分析。记录在案的治疗决定是由槲寄生干预支持的化疗或放化疗,中位治疗期为8.6个月。在术后治疗期间,通过医生进行的结构性访谈,两次诊断患者存在疲劳症状。结果:在中位治疗期结束时,支持治疗组有16/181例(8.8%)患者被诊断为CRF,未给予槲寄生支持治疗的化疗或放化疗组有86/143例(60.1%)患者被诊断为CRF。多变量调整的or提供了证据,证明在治疗期间,与单纯化疗或放化疗相比,支持性槲寄生药物有机会改善CRF。OR = 10.651 (95% CI 5.09-22.28;p < 0.001)下降至OR = 0.054 (95 CI 0.02-0.13;P < 0.001)。此外,通过森林样地比较了14个影响CRF风险评价的混杂因素。结果表明,医院治疗与办公室治疗以及共发病/炎症是疲劳水平的独立但重要的决定因素。结论:临床上使用的槲寄生药物(Iscador(®)Qu)是第一个被纳入支持治疗模式的候选药物,用于结肠直肠癌患者的化疗或放化疗方案,以改善CRF而没有明显的毒性。
Targeting inflammation in cancer-related-fatigue: a rationale for mistletoe therapy as supportive care in colorectal cancer patients.
Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) affects a majority of patients (pts) with symptoms lasting up to several years after finishing therapy. These symptoms lead to decreased health related quality of life. Fatigue during treatment for colorectal cancer is common, but poorly understood and can affect compliance with post-surgical cancer therapy. We examined the fatigue levels during first-line chemo- or radio-chemotherapy protocols, which were supported by a pharmaceutical mistletoe preparation (Iscador(®)Qu) (181patients). We compared the outcome to a parallel control group (143 patients), which did not receive this supportive care treatment.
Methods: The medical records of 324 patients with non-metastasized colorectal cancer (UICC stage I-III), which were obtained from hospitals and resident physicians, were assessed. The documented treatment decision by chemo- or radio-chemotherapy supported by mistletoe interventions was followed for a median treatment period of 8.6 months. During the post-surgical treatment period the patients were diagnosed twice for the presence of fatigue symptoms by structural interviews carried out by physicians.
Results: At the end of the median treatment period, 16/181 patients (8.8%) were diagnosed with CRF in the supportive care group and 86/143 (60.1%) in the chemo- or radio-chemotherapy group without supportive mistletoe medication. Multivariable-adjusted ORs provided evidence for a chance to improve CRF by supportive mistletoe medication compared to chemo- or radio-chemotherapy alone over the time of treatment. The OR = 10.651 (95% CI 5.09-22.28; p < 0.001) declined from the first visit to OR = 0.054 (95 CI 0.02-0.13; p < 0.001) at the end of therapy. Furthermore, 14 confounding factors for risk assessment of CRF were compared by means of forest plots. It turned out that the hospital versus office-based treatment and the co-morbidity/inflammation represent independent but important determinants for fatigue levels.
Conclusion: The clinically used mistletoe medication (Iscador(®)Qu) is the first candidate to be included in a supportive care modus into chemo- or chemo-radiotherapy protocols for colorectal patients to improve CRF without discernable toxicities.