糖尿病足感染中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的危险因素。

Q1 Health Professions Diabetic Foot & Ankle Pub Date : 2014-04-10 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.3402/dfa.v5.23575
Lawrence A Lavery, Javier La Fontaine, Kavita Bhavan, Paul J Kim, Jayme R Williams, Nathan A Hunt
{"title":"糖尿病足感染中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的危险因素。","authors":"Lawrence A Lavery,&nbsp;Javier La Fontaine,&nbsp;Kavita Bhavan,&nbsp;Paul J Kim,&nbsp;Jayme R Williams,&nbsp;Nathan A Hunt","doi":"10.3402/dfa.v5.23575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients hospitalized for diabetic foot infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed hospital admissions for foot infections in patients with diabetes which had nasal swabs, and anaerobic and aerobic tissue cultures at the time of admission. Data collected included patient characteristics and medical history to determine risk factors for developing an MRSA infection in the foot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of MRSA in these infections was 29.8%. Risk factors for MRSA diabetic foot infections were history of MRSA foot infection, MRSA nasal colonization, and multidrug-resistant organisms (p<0.05). Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of nasal colonization with MRSA to identify MRSA diabetic foot infections were 66.7% and 80.0% (sensitivity 41%, specificity 90%). Admission from a nursing home was not a significant risk factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive nasal swabs are not predictive of the infecting agent; however, a negative nasal swab rules out MRSA as the infecting agent in foot wounds with 90% accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45385,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3402/dfa.v5.23575","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic foot infections.\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence A Lavery,&nbsp;Javier La Fontaine,&nbsp;Kavita Bhavan,&nbsp;Paul J Kim,&nbsp;Jayme R Williams,&nbsp;Nathan A Hunt\",\"doi\":\"10.3402/dfa.v5.23575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients hospitalized for diabetic foot infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed hospital admissions for foot infections in patients with diabetes which had nasal swabs, and anaerobic and aerobic tissue cultures at the time of admission. Data collected included patient characteristics and medical history to determine risk factors for developing an MRSA infection in the foot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of MRSA in these infections was 29.8%. Risk factors for MRSA diabetic foot infections were history of MRSA foot infection, MRSA nasal colonization, and multidrug-resistant organisms (p<0.05). Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of nasal colonization with MRSA to identify MRSA diabetic foot infections were 66.7% and 80.0% (sensitivity 41%, specificity 90%). Admission from a nursing home was not a significant risk factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive nasal swabs are not predictive of the infecting agent; however, a negative nasal swab rules out MRSA as the infecting agent in foot wounds with 90% accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Foot & Ankle\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3402/dfa.v5.23575\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Foot & Ankle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v5.23575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v5.23575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估糖尿病足感染住院患者耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的危险因素。方法:我们回顾了住院的糖尿病患者的足部感染,这些患者在入院时进行了鼻拭子检查,并进行了厌氧和有氧组织培养。收集的数据包括患者特征和病史,以确定发生足部MRSA感染的危险因素。结果:MRSA感染率为29.8%。MRSA糖尿病足感染的危险因素是MRSA足部感染史、MRSA鼻腔定植和多重耐药菌(结论:鼻拭子阳性不能预测感染源;然而,鼻拭子阴性排除MRSA为足部伤口感染源的准确率为90%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic foot infections.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients hospitalized for diabetic foot infections.

Methods: We reviewed hospital admissions for foot infections in patients with diabetes which had nasal swabs, and anaerobic and aerobic tissue cultures at the time of admission. Data collected included patient characteristics and medical history to determine risk factors for developing an MRSA infection in the foot.

Results: The prevalence of MRSA in these infections was 29.8%. Risk factors for MRSA diabetic foot infections were history of MRSA foot infection, MRSA nasal colonization, and multidrug-resistant organisms (p<0.05). Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of nasal colonization with MRSA to identify MRSA diabetic foot infections were 66.7% and 80.0% (sensitivity 41%, specificity 90%). Admission from a nursing home was not a significant risk factor.

Conclusion: Positive nasal swabs are not predictive of the infecting agent; however, a negative nasal swab rules out MRSA as the infecting agent in foot wounds with 90% accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Foot & Ankle
Diabetic Foot & Ankle ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limb salvage in diabetic patients with no-option critical limb ischemia: outcomes of a specialized center experience. Serum vitamin D and diabetic foot complications. Diabetes-related foot disorders among adult Ghanaians. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the human recombinant epidermal growth factor in the management of patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic foot ulcer outcomes from a podiatry led tertiary service in Kuwait.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1