增加COPD患者身体活动的干预措施:系统评价

Janet L Larson, Carol M Vos, Dena Fernandez
{"title":"增加COPD患者身体活动的干预措施:系统评价","authors":"Janet L Larson,&nbsp;Carol M Vos,&nbsp;Dena Fernandez","doi":"10.1891/0739-6686.31.297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are very sedentary and this contributes to their health problems. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effects of interventions designed to increase physical activity (PA) in people with COPD. Studies were included when PA was the primary outcome and measured objectively. Six databases were searched and 15 studies with a total of 761 subjects were identified that met inclusion criteria. Nine of the studies were quasi-experimental (QE) and six were randomized controlled trials (RCT). Interventions included pulmonary rehabilitation (n = 7), exercise only (n = 2), behavioral only (n = 2) and a combination of both behavioral and pulmonary rehabilitation/exercise interventions (n = 4). Methodological quality was evaluated using the Downs and Black checklist. The quality of the pulmonary rehabilitation studies was the lowest with a fair rating and the quality of exercise only studies was the highest with a good rating. Eight of the 15 studies demonstrated statistically significant increases in PA: two pulmonary rehabilitation (QE = 2), two exercise only (RCT = 2), two behavioral only (RCT = 1, QE = 1), and two combined behavioral and pulmonary rehabilitation/exercise (RCT = 2). The magnitude of increase was modest in all but one study; and in many studies the increase in PA was not clinically meaningful. Longer interventions demonstrated a higher success rate and only three studies examined longer term effects of the interventions. Existing interventions are promising, but the small number of randomized controlled trials makes it difficult to draw conclusion. Further research is needed to identify a range of interventions that are effective and could be used to promote PA in people with COPD. </p>","PeriodicalId":35733,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of nursing research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1891/0739-6686.31.297","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to increase physical activity in people with COPD: systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Janet L Larson,&nbsp;Carol M Vos,&nbsp;Dena Fernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/0739-6686.31.297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are very sedentary and this contributes to their health problems. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effects of interventions designed to increase physical activity (PA) in people with COPD. Studies were included when PA was the primary outcome and measured objectively. Six databases were searched and 15 studies with a total of 761 subjects were identified that met inclusion criteria. Nine of the studies were quasi-experimental (QE) and six were randomized controlled trials (RCT). Interventions included pulmonary rehabilitation (n = 7), exercise only (n = 2), behavioral only (n = 2) and a combination of both behavioral and pulmonary rehabilitation/exercise interventions (n = 4). Methodological quality was evaluated using the Downs and Black checklist. The quality of the pulmonary rehabilitation studies was the lowest with a fair rating and the quality of exercise only studies was the highest with a good rating. Eight of the 15 studies demonstrated statistically significant increases in PA: two pulmonary rehabilitation (QE = 2), two exercise only (RCT = 2), two behavioral only (RCT = 1, QE = 1), and two combined behavioral and pulmonary rehabilitation/exercise (RCT = 2). The magnitude of increase was modest in all but one study; and in many studies the increase in PA was not clinically meaningful. Longer interventions demonstrated a higher success rate and only three studies examined longer term effects of the interventions. Existing interventions are promising, but the small number of randomized controlled trials makes it difficult to draw conclusion. Further research is needed to identify a range of interventions that are effective and could be used to promote PA in people with COPD. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual review of nursing research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1891/0739-6686.31.297\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual review of nursing research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/0739-6686.31.297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/0739-6686.31.297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的人久坐不动,这会导致他们的健康问题。本系统综述的目的是检查旨在增加COPD患者体力活动(PA)的干预措施的效果。当PA是主要结果并客观测量时纳入研究。检索了6个数据库,确定了15项研究,共761名受试者符合纳入标准。其中9项为准实验(QE), 6项为随机对照试验(RCT)。干预措施包括肺康复(n = 7)、单纯运动(n = 2)、单纯行为(n = 2)以及行为和肺康复/运动干预的结合(n = 4)。方法学质量采用Downs和Black检查表进行评估。肺康复研究的质量最低,评价一般,而运动研究的质量最高,评价良好。15项研究中有8项显示PA有统计学意义的增加:两项肺康复(QE = 2),两项仅运动(RCT = 2),两项仅行为(RCT = 1, QE = 1),两项行为和肺康复/运动相结合(RCT = 2)。除一项研究外,其他研究的增加幅度都不大;在许多研究中,PA的增加没有临床意义。更长时间的干预显示出更高的成功率,只有三项研究检查了干预的长期效果。现有的干预措施是有希望的,但数量较少的随机对照试验使得很难得出结论。需要进一步的研究来确定一系列有效的干预措施,并可用于促进COPD患者的PA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interventions to increase physical activity in people with COPD: systematic review.

People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are very sedentary and this contributes to their health problems. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effects of interventions designed to increase physical activity (PA) in people with COPD. Studies were included when PA was the primary outcome and measured objectively. Six databases were searched and 15 studies with a total of 761 subjects were identified that met inclusion criteria. Nine of the studies were quasi-experimental (QE) and six were randomized controlled trials (RCT). Interventions included pulmonary rehabilitation (n = 7), exercise only (n = 2), behavioral only (n = 2) and a combination of both behavioral and pulmonary rehabilitation/exercise interventions (n = 4). Methodological quality was evaluated using the Downs and Black checklist. The quality of the pulmonary rehabilitation studies was the lowest with a fair rating and the quality of exercise only studies was the highest with a good rating. Eight of the 15 studies demonstrated statistically significant increases in PA: two pulmonary rehabilitation (QE = 2), two exercise only (RCT = 2), two behavioral only (RCT = 1, QE = 1), and two combined behavioral and pulmonary rehabilitation/exercise (RCT = 2). The magnitude of increase was modest in all but one study; and in many studies the increase in PA was not clinically meaningful. Longer interventions demonstrated a higher success rate and only three studies examined longer term effects of the interventions. Existing interventions are promising, but the small number of randomized controlled trials makes it difficult to draw conclusion. Further research is needed to identify a range of interventions that are effective and could be used to promote PA in people with COPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual review of nursing research
Annual review of nursing research Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This landmark annual review has provided nearly three decades of knowledge, insight, and research on topics critical to nurses everywhere. The purpose of this annual review is to critically examine the full gamut of literature on key topics in nursing practice, including nursing theory, care delivery, nursing education, and the professional aspects of nursing. Past volumes of ARNR have addressed critical issues such as: •Pediatric care •Complementary and alternative health •Chronic illness •Geriatrics •Alcohol abuse •Patient safety •Rural nursing •Tobacco use
期刊最新文献
Simulation in Undergraduate Education. State of Simulation Research in Advanced Practice Nursing Education. Human Simulation in Nursing Education. Hospital-Based Simulation. Interprofessional Simulation: From the Classroom to Clinical Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1