{"title":"提高透析液质量对血液透析患者氧化应激和血脂状况的影响","authors":"Driss Elkabbaj, Abdelali Bahadi, Yahia Cherrah, Mourad Errasfa, Rachid Eljaoudi","doi":"10.5402/2013/717849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of malondialdehyde as an oxidative stress marker in the same hemodialysis patients after changing the quality of dialysate with ultrapure dialysis fluid. Methods. This prospective study concerns hemodialysis patients; all patients were in the first step treated with conventional dialysate, and in the second step (three months later) the same patients were treated with online produced ultrapure dialysis fluid. The malondialdehyde, C-reactive protein, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, fibrinogen, and albumin were quantified before the two steps. Results. Thirty-seven patients completed the study. Ultrapure dialysis fluid reduced but not significantly the malondialdehyde concentrations. Both dialysis fluids were associated with improvement in the malondialdehyde level before and after the hemodialysis session. In lipid parameters, there was a significant decrease with conventional dialysis fluid versus ultrapure dialysis fluid of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein in patients' blood. Instead, the level of low-density lipoprotein, fibrinogen, albumin, and C-reactive protein does not change significantly. Conclusion. The lipid parameters were improved for triglycerides and total cholesterol. Malondialdehyde increases following the hemodialysis session, and the conventional dialysate increased malondialdehyde levels more than the ultrapure dialysis but the differences were not statistically significant. </p>","PeriodicalId":90192,"journal":{"name":"ISRN nephrology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"717849"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4045418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of improving quality of dialysis fluid on oxidative stress and lipid profile in hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Driss Elkabbaj, Abdelali Bahadi, Yahia Cherrah, Mourad Errasfa, Rachid Eljaoudi\",\"doi\":\"10.5402/2013/717849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of malondialdehyde as an oxidative stress marker in the same hemodialysis patients after changing the quality of dialysate with ultrapure dialysis fluid. Methods. This prospective study concerns hemodialysis patients; all patients were in the first step treated with conventional dialysate, and in the second step (three months later) the same patients were treated with online produced ultrapure dialysis fluid. The malondialdehyde, C-reactive protein, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, fibrinogen, and albumin were quantified before the two steps. Results. Thirty-seven patients completed the study. Ultrapure dialysis fluid reduced but not significantly the malondialdehyde concentrations. Both dialysis fluids were associated with improvement in the malondialdehyde level before and after the hemodialysis session. In lipid parameters, there was a significant decrease with conventional dialysis fluid versus ultrapure dialysis fluid of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein in patients' blood. Instead, the level of low-density lipoprotein, fibrinogen, albumin, and C-reactive protein does not change significantly. Conclusion. The lipid parameters were improved for triglycerides and total cholesterol. Malondialdehyde increases following the hemodialysis session, and the conventional dialysate increased malondialdehyde levels more than the ultrapure dialysis but the differences were not statistically significant. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN nephrology\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"717849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4045418/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/717849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/717849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评估使用超纯透析液改变透析液质量后,相同血液透析患者体内作为氧化应激标志物的丙二醛水平。研究方法这项前瞻性研究涉及血液透析患者;所有患者在第一步都接受了传统透析液的治疗,在第二步(三个月后),同样的患者接受了在线生产的超纯透析液的治疗。在两个步骤之前,对丙二醛、C 反应蛋白、总胆固醇、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白、纤维蛋白原和白蛋白进行了量化。结果37名患者完成了研究。超纯透析液降低了丙二醛浓度,但降幅不大。两种透析液都能改善血液透析前后的丙二醛水平。在血脂参数方面,传统透析液与超纯透析液相比,患者血液中的甘油三酯、总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白含量明显下降。相反,低密度脂蛋白、纤维蛋白原、白蛋白和 C 反应蛋白的水平变化不大。结论甘油三酯和总胆固醇的血脂参数有所改善。血液透析后丙二醛会增加,传统透析液比超纯透析液更容易增加丙二醛水平,但差异没有统计学意义。
Impact of improving quality of dialysis fluid on oxidative stress and lipid profile in hemodialysis patients.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of malondialdehyde as an oxidative stress marker in the same hemodialysis patients after changing the quality of dialysate with ultrapure dialysis fluid. Methods. This prospective study concerns hemodialysis patients; all patients were in the first step treated with conventional dialysate, and in the second step (three months later) the same patients were treated with online produced ultrapure dialysis fluid. The malondialdehyde, C-reactive protein, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, fibrinogen, and albumin were quantified before the two steps. Results. Thirty-seven patients completed the study. Ultrapure dialysis fluid reduced but not significantly the malondialdehyde concentrations. Both dialysis fluids were associated with improvement in the malondialdehyde level before and after the hemodialysis session. In lipid parameters, there was a significant decrease with conventional dialysis fluid versus ultrapure dialysis fluid of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein in patients' blood. Instead, the level of low-density lipoprotein, fibrinogen, albumin, and C-reactive protein does not change significantly. Conclusion. The lipid parameters were improved for triglycerides and total cholesterol. Malondialdehyde increases following the hemodialysis session, and the conventional dialysate increased malondialdehyde levels more than the ultrapure dialysis but the differences were not statistically significant.