膜生物不相容性和超滤对血液透析脉搏波分析的影响。

ISRN nephrology Pub Date : 2012-12-17 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.5402/2013/892315
Maria-Pau Valenzuela, Jaume Almirall, María-José Amengual
{"title":"膜生物不相容性和超滤对血液透析脉搏波分析的影响。","authors":"Maria-Pau Valenzuela,&nbsp;Jaume Almirall,&nbsp;María-José Amengual","doi":"10.5402/2013/892315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Membrane bioincompatibility was demonstrated by successive white blood cell counts and C3a generation. Pulse wave analysis was obtained by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor) in a sequential way: basal, after 30 minutes with nul ultrafiltration, and after a complete dialysis with ultrafiltration. At 15 minutes of haemodialysis, significant decrease in leukocyte count occurred: 6801 ± 1186 versus 4412 ± 1333 (P < 0.001), while C3a levels sharply increased from 427 ± 269 to 3501 ± 1638 ng/mL (P < 0.000). No changes were observed in augmentation index without ultrafiltration: 26.1 ± 11.1 versus 26.6 ± 12.4. Only aortic systolic blood pressure was lower at 15 minutes: 120.1 ± 17.7 versus 110.4 ± 25.8 mmHg (P = 0.009), in agreement with a reduction in brachial systolic blood pressure: 135.1 ± 18.1 versus 122.7 ± 27.4 mmHg (P = 0.01), without changes in aortic or brachial diastolic blood pressure. Important changes in pulse wave analysis were observed after a complete haemodialysis session: augmentation index 29.9 ± 10.1 versus 18.6 ± 15.0, aortic systolic blood pressure 139.8 ± 25.5 versus 119.4 ± 28.5 mmHg (P < 0.00), without changes in aortic diastolic blood pressure. In summary, haemodialysis with cellulose diacetate acutely induced a transient state of immunoactivation due to bioincompatibility, this phenomenon was nondetectable by pulse wave analysis. Complete haemodialysis session led to important changes in pulse wave analysis. </p>","PeriodicalId":90192,"journal":{"name":"ISRN nephrology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"892315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4045438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Membrane Bioincompatibility and Ultrafiltration Effects on Pulse Wave Analysis during Haemodialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Maria-Pau Valenzuela,&nbsp;Jaume Almirall,&nbsp;María-José Amengual\",\"doi\":\"10.5402/2013/892315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Membrane bioincompatibility was demonstrated by successive white blood cell counts and C3a generation. Pulse wave analysis was obtained by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor) in a sequential way: basal, after 30 minutes with nul ultrafiltration, and after a complete dialysis with ultrafiltration. At 15 minutes of haemodialysis, significant decrease in leukocyte count occurred: 6801 ± 1186 versus 4412 ± 1333 (P < 0.001), while C3a levels sharply increased from 427 ± 269 to 3501 ± 1638 ng/mL (P < 0.000). No changes were observed in augmentation index without ultrafiltration: 26.1 ± 11.1 versus 26.6 ± 12.4. Only aortic systolic blood pressure was lower at 15 minutes: 120.1 ± 17.7 versus 110.4 ± 25.8 mmHg (P = 0.009), in agreement with a reduction in brachial systolic blood pressure: 135.1 ± 18.1 versus 122.7 ± 27.4 mmHg (P = 0.01), without changes in aortic or brachial diastolic blood pressure. Important changes in pulse wave analysis were observed after a complete haemodialysis session: augmentation index 29.9 ± 10.1 versus 18.6 ± 15.0, aortic systolic blood pressure 139.8 ± 25.5 versus 119.4 ± 28.5 mmHg (P < 0.00), without changes in aortic diastolic blood pressure. In summary, haemodialysis with cellulose diacetate acutely induced a transient state of immunoactivation due to bioincompatibility, this phenomenon was nondetectable by pulse wave analysis. Complete haemodialysis session led to important changes in pulse wave analysis. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN nephrology\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"892315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4045438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/892315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/892315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

连续的白细胞计数和C3a的产生证明了膜的生物不相容性。脉搏波分析采用压平血压计(sphygmogo),按顺序进行:基础透析、无超滤30分钟后、完全透析后超滤。在血液透析15分钟时,白细胞计数明显减少,从6801±1186减至4412±1333 (P < 0.001),而C3a水平从427±269急剧上升至3501±1638 ng/mL (P < 0.000)。未经超滤处理的增强指数无变化,分别为26.1±11.1和26.6±12.4。只有主动脉收缩压在15分钟时降低:120.1±17.7 mmHg比110.4±25.8 mmHg (P = 0.009),与肱动脉收缩压的降低一致:135.1±18.1 mmHg比122.7±27.4 mmHg (P = 0.01),主动脉或肱动脉舒张压没有变化。完全血液透析后脉搏波分析的重要变化:增强指数29.9±10.1比18.6±15.0,主动脉收缩压139.8±25.5比119.4±28.5 mmHg (P < 0.00),主动脉舒张压无变化。综上所述,双醋酸纤维素血液透析由于生物不相容性而急性诱导短暂的免疫激活状态,这种现象是脉搏波分析无法检测到的。完全血液透析导致脉搏波分析的重要变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Membrane Bioincompatibility and Ultrafiltration Effects on Pulse Wave Analysis during Haemodialysis.

Membrane bioincompatibility was demonstrated by successive white blood cell counts and C3a generation. Pulse wave analysis was obtained by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor) in a sequential way: basal, after 30 minutes with nul ultrafiltration, and after a complete dialysis with ultrafiltration. At 15 minutes of haemodialysis, significant decrease in leukocyte count occurred: 6801 ± 1186 versus 4412 ± 1333 (P < 0.001), while C3a levels sharply increased from 427 ± 269 to 3501 ± 1638 ng/mL (P < 0.000). No changes were observed in augmentation index without ultrafiltration: 26.1 ± 11.1 versus 26.6 ± 12.4. Only aortic systolic blood pressure was lower at 15 minutes: 120.1 ± 17.7 versus 110.4 ± 25.8 mmHg (P = 0.009), in agreement with a reduction in brachial systolic blood pressure: 135.1 ± 18.1 versus 122.7 ± 27.4 mmHg (P = 0.01), without changes in aortic or brachial diastolic blood pressure. Important changes in pulse wave analysis were observed after a complete haemodialysis session: augmentation index 29.9 ± 10.1 versus 18.6 ± 15.0, aortic systolic blood pressure 139.8 ± 25.5 versus 119.4 ± 28.5 mmHg (P < 0.00), without changes in aortic diastolic blood pressure. In summary, haemodialysis with cellulose diacetate acutely induced a transient state of immunoactivation due to bioincompatibility, this phenomenon was nondetectable by pulse wave analysis. Complete haemodialysis session led to important changes in pulse wave analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urinary biomarkers of acute kidney injury in patients with liver cirrhosis. Angiotensin Type-1 Receptor Blockade May Not Protect Kidney against Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. The Utility of Serial Allograft Biopsies during Delayed Graft Function in Renal Transplantation under Current Immunosuppressive Regimens. Effect of α -Lipoic Acid on Oxidative Stress in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Intravenous Iron. Proteinuria, (99m) Tc-DTPA Scintigraphy, Creatinine-, Cystatin- and Combined-Based Equations in the Assessment of Chronic Kidney Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1