从DNA序列数据中划分细菌生态型的算法的准确性和效率。

Juan Carlos Francisco, Frederick M Cohan, Danny Krizanc
{"title":"从DNA序列数据中划分细菌生态型的算法的准确性和效率。","authors":"Juan Carlos Francisco,&nbsp;Frederick M Cohan,&nbsp;Danny Krizanc","doi":"10.1504/IJBRA.2014.062992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification of closely related, ecologically distinct populations of bacteria would benefit microbiologists working in many fields including systematics, epidemiology and biotechnology. Several laboratories have recently developed algorithms aimed at demarcating such 'ecotypes'. We examine the ability of four of these algorithms to correctly identify ecotypes from sequence data. We tested the algorithms on synthetic sequences, with known history and habitat associations, generated under the stable ecotype model and on data from Bacillus strains isolated from Death Valley where previous work has confirmed the existence of multiple ecotypes. We found that one of the algorithms (ecotype simulation) performs significantly better than the others (AdaptML, GMYC, BAPS) in both instances. Unfortunately, it was also shown to be the least efficient of the four. While ecotype simulation is the most accurate, it is by a large margin the slowest of the algorithms tested. Attempts at improving its efficiency are underway. </p>","PeriodicalId":35444,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJBRA.2014.062992","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and efficiency of algorithms for the demarcation of bacterial ecotypes from DNA sequence data.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Carlos Francisco,&nbsp;Frederick M Cohan,&nbsp;Danny Krizanc\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJBRA.2014.062992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Identification of closely related, ecologically distinct populations of bacteria would benefit microbiologists working in many fields including systematics, epidemiology and biotechnology. Several laboratories have recently developed algorithms aimed at demarcating such 'ecotypes'. We examine the ability of four of these algorithms to correctly identify ecotypes from sequence data. We tested the algorithms on synthetic sequences, with known history and habitat associations, generated under the stable ecotype model and on data from Bacillus strains isolated from Death Valley where previous work has confirmed the existence of multiple ecotypes. We found that one of the algorithms (ecotype simulation) performs significantly better than the others (AdaptML, GMYC, BAPS) in both instances. Unfortunately, it was also shown to be the least efficient of the four. While ecotype simulation is the most accurate, it is by a large margin the slowest of the algorithms tested. Attempts at improving its efficiency are underway. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJBRA.2014.062992\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBRA.2014.062992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBRA.2014.062992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

鉴定密切相关的、生态上不同的细菌种群将有利于在系统学、流行病学和生物技术等许多领域工作的微生物学家。几个实验室最近开发了旨在区分这种“生态型”的算法。我们研究了这些算法中的四种从序列数据中正确识别生态型的能力。我们在稳定生态型模型下生成的具有已知历史和栖息地关联的合成序列以及从死亡谷分离的芽孢杆菌菌株的数据上测试了算法,其中先前的工作已经证实了多种生态型的存在。我们发现,在这两种情况下,其中一种算法(生态型模拟)的性能明显优于其他算法(AdaptML, GMYC, BAPS)。不幸的是,它也是四种方法中效率最低的。虽然生态型模拟是最准确的,但它在测试的算法中却是最慢的。提高其效率的尝试正在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy and efficiency of algorithms for the demarcation of bacterial ecotypes from DNA sequence data.

Identification of closely related, ecologically distinct populations of bacteria would benefit microbiologists working in many fields including systematics, epidemiology and biotechnology. Several laboratories have recently developed algorithms aimed at demarcating such 'ecotypes'. We examine the ability of four of these algorithms to correctly identify ecotypes from sequence data. We tested the algorithms on synthetic sequences, with known history and habitat associations, generated under the stable ecotype model and on data from Bacillus strains isolated from Death Valley where previous work has confirmed the existence of multiple ecotypes. We found that one of the algorithms (ecotype simulation) performs significantly better than the others (AdaptML, GMYC, BAPS) in both instances. Unfortunately, it was also shown to be the least efficient of the four. While ecotype simulation is the most accurate, it is by a large margin the slowest of the algorithms tested. Attempts at improving its efficiency are underway.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications
International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Bioinformatics is an interdisciplinary research field that combines biology, computer science, mathematics and statistics into a broad-based field that will have profound impacts on all fields of biology. The emphasis of IJBRA is on basic bioinformatics research methods, tool development, performance evaluation and their applications in biology. IJBRA addresses the most innovative developments, research issues and solutions in bioinformatics and computational biology and their applications. Topics covered include Databases, bio-grid, system biology Biomedical image processing, modelling and simulation Bio-ontology and data mining, DNA assembly, clustering, mapping Computational genomics/proteomics Silico technology: computational intelligence, high performance computing E-health, telemedicine Gene expression, microarrays, identification, annotation Genetic algorithms, fuzzy logic, neural networks, data visualisation Hidden Markov models, machine learning, support vector machines Molecular evolution, phylogeny, modelling, simulation, sequence analysis Parallel algorithms/architectures, computational structural biology Phylogeny reconstruction algorithms, physiome, protein structure prediction Sequence assembly, search, alignment Signalling/computational biomedical data engineering Simulated annealing, statistical analysis, stochastic grammars.
期刊最新文献
CoSec In silico studies on Acalypha indica, Catharanthus roseus and Coleus aromaticus derivative compounds against Omicron Prediction of ncRNA from RNA-Seq Data using Machine Learning Techniques A Machine Learning Approach to Assisted Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease with Convolutional Neural Network Development of Predictive Model of Diabetic Using Supervised Machine Learning Classification Algorithm of Ensemble Voting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1