复发、缓解和继发进行性多发性硬化症患者的认知障碍:计算机认知筛查电池的疗效。

ISRN Neurology Pub Date : 2014-03-13 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/151379
Athanasios Papathanasiou, Lambros Messinis, Vasileios L Georgiou, Panagiotis Papathanasopoulos
{"title":"复发、缓解和继发进行性多发性硬化症患者的认知障碍:计算机认知筛查电池的疗效。","authors":"Athanasios Papathanasiou,&nbsp;Lambros Messinis,&nbsp;Vasileios L Georgiou,&nbsp;Panagiotis Papathanasopoulos","doi":"10.1155/2014/151379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective. To investigate the pattern of cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients using a computerized battery. Methods. RRMS patients (N = 50), SPMS patients (N = 30), and controls (N = 31) were assessed by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS VS) computerized battery, Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B, and semantic and phonological verbal fluency tasks. Results. The overall prevalence of cognitive dysfunction was 53.75% (RRMS 38%, SPMS 80%). RRMS patients differed from controls with large effect size on reaction time, medium effect size on TMT A and small on TMT B, phonological verbal fluency, composite memory, psychomotor speed, and cognitive flexibility. SPMS patients differed from controls in all neuropsychological measures (except complex attention) with large effect sizes on TMT A and B, phonological verbal fluency, composite memory, psychomotor speed, reaction time, and cognitive flexibility. Between patient groups, medium effect sizes were present on TMT B and psychomotor speed, while small effect sizes were present on composite memory and processing speed. Conclusion. CNS VS is sensitive in detecting cognitive impairment in RRMS and SPMS patients. Significant impairment in episodic memory, executive function, and processing speed were identified, with gradual increment of the frequency as disease progresses. </p>","PeriodicalId":14626,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Neurology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"151379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/151379","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients: efficacy of a computerized cognitive screening battery.\",\"authors\":\"Athanasios Papathanasiou,&nbsp;Lambros Messinis,&nbsp;Vasileios L Georgiou,&nbsp;Panagiotis Papathanasopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/151379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective. To investigate the pattern of cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients using a computerized battery. Methods. RRMS patients (N = 50), SPMS patients (N = 30), and controls (N = 31) were assessed by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS VS) computerized battery, Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B, and semantic and phonological verbal fluency tasks. Results. The overall prevalence of cognitive dysfunction was 53.75% (RRMS 38%, SPMS 80%). RRMS patients differed from controls with large effect size on reaction time, medium effect size on TMT A and small on TMT B, phonological verbal fluency, composite memory, psychomotor speed, and cognitive flexibility. SPMS patients differed from controls in all neuropsychological measures (except complex attention) with large effect sizes on TMT A and B, phonological verbal fluency, composite memory, psychomotor speed, reaction time, and cognitive flexibility. Between patient groups, medium effect sizes were present on TMT B and psychomotor speed, while small effect sizes were present on composite memory and processing speed. Conclusion. CNS VS is sensitive in detecting cognitive impairment in RRMS and SPMS patients. Significant impairment in episodic memory, executive function, and processing speed were identified, with gradual increment of the frequency as disease progresses. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN Neurology\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"151379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/151379\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/151379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/151379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

目标。使用计算机电池研究复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)和继发性进行性多发性硬化症(SPMS)患者认知功能障碍的模式。方法。RRMS患者(N = 50), SPMS患者(N = 30)和对照组(N = 31)通过中枢神经系统生命体征(CNS VS)计算机化电池,Trail Making Tests (TMT) A和B,以及语义和语音语言流畅性任务进行评估。结果。总体认知功能障碍患病率为53.75% (RRMS为38%,SPMS为80%)。RRMS患者的反应时间效应量大,TMT A效应量中等,TMT B效应量小,语音语言流畅性、复合记忆、精神运动速度和认知灵活性与对照组不同。SPMS患者在所有神经心理学测量(除了复杂注意)上都与对照组不同,在TMT A和B、语音语言流畅性、复合记忆、精神运动速度、反应时间和认知灵活性上的效应量很大。患者组间,TMT B和精神运动速度存在中等效应,而复合记忆和加工速度存在小效应。结论。CNS VS对RRMS和SPMS患者的认知障碍检测敏感。情节记忆、执行功能和处理速度的显著损伤被确定,随着疾病的进展,频率逐渐增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients: efficacy of a computerized cognitive screening battery.

Objective. To investigate the pattern of cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients using a computerized battery. Methods. RRMS patients (N = 50), SPMS patients (N = 30), and controls (N = 31) were assessed by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS VS) computerized battery, Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B, and semantic and phonological verbal fluency tasks. Results. The overall prevalence of cognitive dysfunction was 53.75% (RRMS 38%, SPMS 80%). RRMS patients differed from controls with large effect size on reaction time, medium effect size on TMT A and small on TMT B, phonological verbal fluency, composite memory, psychomotor speed, and cognitive flexibility. SPMS patients differed from controls in all neuropsychological measures (except complex attention) with large effect sizes on TMT A and B, phonological verbal fluency, composite memory, psychomotor speed, reaction time, and cognitive flexibility. Between patient groups, medium effect sizes were present on TMT B and psychomotor speed, while small effect sizes were present on composite memory and processing speed. Conclusion. CNS VS is sensitive in detecting cognitive impairment in RRMS and SPMS patients. Significant impairment in episodic memory, executive function, and processing speed were identified, with gradual increment of the frequency as disease progresses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Small fiber neuropathy associated with hyperlipidemia: utility of cutaneous silent periods and autonomic tests. Cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients: efficacy of a computerized cognitive screening battery. Minimizing technical failure of percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia using neuronavigation. Nonmotor symptoms in early- and advanced-stage Parkinson's disease patients on dopaminergic therapy: how do they correlate with quality of life? Evaluating different aspects of prospective memory in amnestic and nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1