阿替洛尔与氯沙坦作为轻中度原发性高血压的一线药物的多中心双盲随机对照试验。

Q4 Medicine Journal of the Indian Medical Association Pub Date : 2013-12-01
Santanu Guha, Rajnish Avasthi, V S Narain, C Rajendiran, Monjori Mitra, Sayantan Ray, Debdutta Majumdar, Md Miraj Mondal, Siddhartha Mani, Soura Mookerjee, Jayanta Saha, Dipankar Ghosh Dastidaro
{"title":"阿替洛尔与氯沙坦作为轻中度原发性高血压的一线药物的多中心双盲随机对照试验。","authors":"Santanu Guha,&nbsp;Rajnish Avasthi,&nbsp;V S Narain,&nbsp;C Rajendiran,&nbsp;Monjori Mitra,&nbsp;Sayantan Ray,&nbsp;Debdutta Majumdar,&nbsp;Md Miraj Mondal,&nbsp;Siddhartha Mani,&nbsp;Soura Mookerjee,&nbsp;Jayanta Saha,&nbsp;Dipankar Ghosh Dastidaro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provides a more reliable assessment of actual BP than office BP and is a more sensitive risk predictor of clinical cardiovascular outcomes. Recent international guidelines for hypertension have emphasised the usefulness of ambulatory BP for diagnosis and management of hypertension. We used ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to monitor the effect of the pharmacological treatment in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension. This was a multicentric randomised controlled trial having 360 subjects with 180 in each treatment arm. The duration of study was 6 months. The patients were randomly selected to receive atenolol or losartan as initial therapy. The dose of atenolol or losartan was 50 mg once daily at 8 am in the morning. Ambulatory BP assessment was done in a subgroup of subjects using Schiller BR-102 plus machine. One hundred and thirty patients were recruited for the study using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. There were 66 patients in atenolol arm and 64 patients in the losartan arm. A significant white coat hypertension was noticed in both the arms. Out of 130 subjects in the ambulatory group, 41.53% had a white coat hypertension. Statistically significant reduction of office BP was observed with both atenolol and losartan; however, no significant difference in efficacy of the two drugs was found in reducing office BP. However, when using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, the reduction with either drug was not significant. The dipper status was better in the atenolol group than the losartan group. Neither of the drugs prevent morning surge of BP when administered once daily in the morning. There was high prevalence of white coat hypertension in patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension. There was similar reduction of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure by the 2 study drugs. Atenolol scores over losartan in converting non-dipper to dipper but its' impact on clinical outcome is not known. Morning surge of BP was unaffected by either of the study drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multicentric double blind randomised controlled trial of atenolol versus losartan as first line drug for mild to moderate essential hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Santanu Guha,&nbsp;Rajnish Avasthi,&nbsp;V S Narain,&nbsp;C Rajendiran,&nbsp;Monjori Mitra,&nbsp;Sayantan Ray,&nbsp;Debdutta Majumdar,&nbsp;Md Miraj Mondal,&nbsp;Siddhartha Mani,&nbsp;Soura Mookerjee,&nbsp;Jayanta Saha,&nbsp;Dipankar Ghosh Dastidaro\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provides a more reliable assessment of actual BP than office BP and is a more sensitive risk predictor of clinical cardiovascular outcomes. Recent international guidelines for hypertension have emphasised the usefulness of ambulatory BP for diagnosis and management of hypertension. We used ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to monitor the effect of the pharmacological treatment in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension. This was a multicentric randomised controlled trial having 360 subjects with 180 in each treatment arm. The duration of study was 6 months. The patients were randomly selected to receive atenolol or losartan as initial therapy. The dose of atenolol or losartan was 50 mg once daily at 8 am in the morning. Ambulatory BP assessment was done in a subgroup of subjects using Schiller BR-102 plus machine. One hundred and thirty patients were recruited for the study using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. There were 66 patients in atenolol arm and 64 patients in the losartan arm. A significant white coat hypertension was noticed in both the arms. Out of 130 subjects in the ambulatory group, 41.53% had a white coat hypertension. Statistically significant reduction of office BP was observed with both atenolol and losartan; however, no significant difference in efficacy of the two drugs was found in reducing office BP. However, when using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, the reduction with either drug was not significant. The dipper status was better in the atenolol group than the losartan group. Neither of the drugs prevent morning surge of BP when administered once daily in the morning. There was high prevalence of white coat hypertension in patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension. There was similar reduction of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure by the 2 study drugs. Atenolol scores over losartan in converting non-dipper to dipper but its' impact on clinical outcome is not known. Morning surge of BP was unaffected by either of the study drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Indian Medical Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Indian Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动态血压监测提供了比办公室血压更可靠的实际血压评估,是临床心血管预后更敏感的风险预测指标。最近的国际高血压指南强调了动态血压对高血压诊断和治疗的有用性。我们使用动态血压监测来监测1期或2期高血压患者的药物治疗效果。这是一项多中心随机对照试验,共有360名受试者,每个治疗组180名。研究时间为6个月。随机选择患者接受阿替洛尔或氯沙坦作为初始治疗。阿替洛尔或氯沙坦的剂量为50 mg,每日1次,早上8点服用。使用席勒BR-102 +机对一组受试者进行动态血压评估。这项研究招募了130名患者,使用动态血压监测。阿替洛尔组66例,氯沙坦组64例。双臂可见明显的白大褂性高血压。在门诊组的130名受试者中,41.53%的人有白大衣高血压。阿替洛尔和氯沙坦均可显著降低办公室血压;然而,两种药物在降低办公室血压方面的疗效无显著差异。然而,当使用动态血压监测时,两种药物的降低都不显著。阿替洛尔组的浸出状态优于氯沙坦组。当每天早晨服用一次时,这两种药物都不能防止血压晨升。在1期和2期高血压患者中,白大衣高血压的患病率较高。两种研究药物对收缩压和舒张压的降低效果相似。阿替洛尔的评分高于氯沙坦,但其对临床结果的影响尚不清楚。两种研究药物均未影响晨间血压升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A multicentric double blind randomised controlled trial of atenolol versus losartan as first line drug for mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provides a more reliable assessment of actual BP than office BP and is a more sensitive risk predictor of clinical cardiovascular outcomes. Recent international guidelines for hypertension have emphasised the usefulness of ambulatory BP for diagnosis and management of hypertension. We used ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to monitor the effect of the pharmacological treatment in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension. This was a multicentric randomised controlled trial having 360 subjects with 180 in each treatment arm. The duration of study was 6 months. The patients were randomly selected to receive atenolol or losartan as initial therapy. The dose of atenolol or losartan was 50 mg once daily at 8 am in the morning. Ambulatory BP assessment was done in a subgroup of subjects using Schiller BR-102 plus machine. One hundred and thirty patients were recruited for the study using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. There were 66 patients in atenolol arm and 64 patients in the losartan arm. A significant white coat hypertension was noticed in both the arms. Out of 130 subjects in the ambulatory group, 41.53% had a white coat hypertension. Statistically significant reduction of office BP was observed with both atenolol and losartan; however, no significant difference in efficacy of the two drugs was found in reducing office BP. However, when using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, the reduction with either drug was not significant. The dipper status was better in the atenolol group than the losartan group. Neither of the drugs prevent morning surge of BP when administered once daily in the morning. There was high prevalence of white coat hypertension in patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension. There was similar reduction of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure by the 2 study drugs. Atenolol scores over losartan in converting non-dipper to dipper but its' impact on clinical outcome is not known. Morning surge of BP was unaffected by either of the study drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Indian Medical association, popularly known as JIMA, an indexed (in index medicus) monthly journal, has the largest circulation (over 1.75 lakh Copies per month) of all the indexed and other medical journals of India and abroad. This journal is also available in microfilm through Bell & Howels, USA. The founder leaders of this prestigious journal include Late Sir Nilratan Sircar, Dr Bidhan Chandra Roy, Dr Kumud Sankar Ray and other scholars and doyens of the medical profession. It started in the pre-independence era (1930) with only 122 doctors.
期刊最新文献
Essential thrombocythaemia Medullary carcinoma of the thyroid Animal Bite Family planning. Peripartum cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1