降钙素原比c反应蛋白、红细胞沉降率和白细胞计数更能预测脓毒症患者的dna血症。

Christian Leli, Angela Cardaccia, Marta Ferranti, Angelica Cesarini, Francesco D'Alò, Carla Ferri, Elio Cenci, Antonella Mencacci
{"title":"降钙素原比c反应蛋白、红细胞沉降率和白细胞计数更能预测脓毒症患者的dna血症。","authors":"Christian Leli,&nbsp;Angela Cardaccia,&nbsp;Marta Ferranti,&nbsp;Angelica Cesarini,&nbsp;Francesco D'Alò,&nbsp;Carla Ferri,&nbsp;Elio Cenci,&nbsp;Antonella Mencacci","doi":"10.3109/00365548.2014.936493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Procalcitonin (PCT) levels can be used to predict bacteremia and DNAemia in patients with sepsis. In this study, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT in predicting blood culture (BC) results and DNAemia, as detected by real-time PCR (RT-PCR), was compared with that of other markers of inflammation commonly evaluated in patients with suspected sepsis, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cell (WBC) count.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 571 patients for whom BC, blood RT-PCR, PCT, CRP, ESR, and WBC count were requested for laboratory diagnosis of sepsis were included in the study. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the ability of the above biomarkers to predict BC and blood RT-PCR results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 108 pathogens were identified by BC (79 pathogens, 14.5% positive rate) and/or RT-PCR (90 pathogens, 16.5% positive rate), after exclusion of 26 contaminated samples. The PCT areas under the curve (AUCs) in predicting BC (0.843; 95% CI 0.796-0.890; p < 0.0001) and RT-PCR (0.916; 95% CI 0.888-0.945; p < 0.0001) results were significantly greater than AUCs found for CRP, ESR, and WBC count.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCT showed a better diagnostic accuracy than CRP, ESR, and WBC count in predicting DNAemia and bacteremia in patients with suspected sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21541,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"46 11","pages":"745-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365548.2014.936493","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procalcitonin better than C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and white blood cell count in predicting DNAemia in patients with sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Leli,&nbsp;Angela Cardaccia,&nbsp;Marta Ferranti,&nbsp;Angelica Cesarini,&nbsp;Francesco D'Alò,&nbsp;Carla Ferri,&nbsp;Elio Cenci,&nbsp;Antonella Mencacci\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/00365548.2014.936493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Procalcitonin (PCT) levels can be used to predict bacteremia and DNAemia in patients with sepsis. In this study, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT in predicting blood culture (BC) results and DNAemia, as detected by real-time PCR (RT-PCR), was compared with that of other markers of inflammation commonly evaluated in patients with suspected sepsis, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cell (WBC) count.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 571 patients for whom BC, blood RT-PCR, PCT, CRP, ESR, and WBC count were requested for laboratory diagnosis of sepsis were included in the study. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the ability of the above biomarkers to predict BC and blood RT-PCR results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 108 pathogens were identified by BC (79 pathogens, 14.5% positive rate) and/or RT-PCR (90 pathogens, 16.5% positive rate), after exclusion of 26 contaminated samples. The PCT areas under the curve (AUCs) in predicting BC (0.843; 95% CI 0.796-0.890; p < 0.0001) and RT-PCR (0.916; 95% CI 0.888-0.945; p < 0.0001) results were significantly greater than AUCs found for CRP, ESR, and WBC count.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCT showed a better diagnostic accuracy than CRP, ESR, and WBC count in predicting DNAemia and bacteremia in patients with suspected sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"46 11\",\"pages\":\"745-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365548.2014.936493\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.936493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.936493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

背景:降钙素原(PCT)水平可用于预测脓毒症患者的菌血症和dna血症。本研究将实时荧光定量PCR (RT-PCR)检测的PCT预测血培养(BC)结果和dna血症的诊断准确性与疑似脓毒症患者常用的其他炎症标志物(如c反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和白细胞(WBC)计数)进行比较。方法:选取571例脓毒症实验室诊断要求BC、RT-PCR、PCT、CRP、ESR和WBC计数的患者作为研究对象。进行受试者工作特征曲线分析,比较上述生物标志物预测BC和血液RT-PCR结果的能力。结果:在排除污染样品26份后,BC法(79份,阳性率14.5%)和/或RT-PCR法(90份,阳性率16.5%)共检出病原菌108份。PCT曲线下面积(auc)预测BC (0.843;95% ci 0.796-0.890;p < 0.0001)和RT-PCR (0.916;95% ci 0.888-0.945;p < 0.0001)的结果明显大于CRP、ESR和WBC计数的auc。结论:PCT在预测疑似脓毒症患者dna血症和菌血症方面的诊断准确性优于CRP、ESR和WBC计数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Procalcitonin better than C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and white blood cell count in predicting DNAemia in patients with sepsis.

Background: Procalcitonin (PCT) levels can be used to predict bacteremia and DNAemia in patients with sepsis. In this study, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT in predicting blood culture (BC) results and DNAemia, as detected by real-time PCR (RT-PCR), was compared with that of other markers of inflammation commonly evaluated in patients with suspected sepsis, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cell (WBC) count.

Methods: A total of 571 patients for whom BC, blood RT-PCR, PCT, CRP, ESR, and WBC count were requested for laboratory diagnosis of sepsis were included in the study. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the ability of the above biomarkers to predict BC and blood RT-PCR results.

Results: A total of 108 pathogens were identified by BC (79 pathogens, 14.5% positive rate) and/or RT-PCR (90 pathogens, 16.5% positive rate), after exclusion of 26 contaminated samples. The PCT areas under the curve (AUCs) in predicting BC (0.843; 95% CI 0.796-0.890; p < 0.0001) and RT-PCR (0.916; 95% CI 0.888-0.945; p < 0.0001) results were significantly greater than AUCs found for CRP, ESR, and WBC count.

Conclusions: PCT showed a better diagnostic accuracy than CRP, ESR, and WBC count in predicting DNAemia and bacteremia in patients with suspected sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risk of neonatal and childhood morbidity among preterm infants exposed to marijuana. Performance of the Simplexa™ Flu A/B & RSV Direct Kit on respiratory samples collected in saline solution. Elevated levels of circulating histones indicate disease activity in patients with hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). The decline of the impetigo epidemic caused by the epidemic European fusidic acid-resistant impetigo clone: an 11.5-year population-based incidence study from a community in Western Norway. Efficacy and safety of switching to raltegravir plus atazanavir dual therapy in pretreated HIV-1-infected patients over 144 weeks: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1