硬膜外地塞米松对预防硬膜穿刺后头痛有效吗?

Atabak Najafi, Sara Emami, Mohammadreza Khajavi, Farhad Etezadi, Farsad Imani, Mahbod Lajevardi, Pejman Pourfakhr, Reza Shariat Moharari
{"title":"硬膜外地塞米松对预防硬膜穿刺后头痛有效吗?","authors":"Atabak Najafi,&nbsp;Sara Emami,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Khajavi,&nbsp;Farhad Etezadi,&nbsp;Farsad Imani,&nbsp;Mahbod Lajevardi,&nbsp;Pejman Pourfakhr,&nbsp;Reza Shariat Moharari","doi":"10.1016/j.aat.2014.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the common complications of spinal anesthesia; it is observed in 1–40% of cases involving spinal anesthesia. It can cause considerable morbidity and 40% of cases may require invasive treatments such as epidural blood patch. With the exception of invasive treatments such as an epidural blood patch, current standard treatment modalities have not proved efficacious. There had been some research done that indicated successful prophylaxis and/or treatment of PDPH by administration of intravenous steroids. Based on those findings, we hypothesize that a direct injection of corticosteroids to the anesthesia puncture site could increase the amount of corticosteroid that accumulates in the puncture site, and will be more effective in decreasing dural inflammation and incidence of PDPH than that of parenteral steroids. We formulated our study to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone directly injected into spinal anesthesia puncture sites.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 268 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups; one group received a prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone (2 mL, 8 mg) and the other group received 2 mL of normal saline. The incidence and intensity of PDPH and puncture site backache were each measured at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after spinal anesthesia. The intensity of the headache was graded according to the meningeal headache index.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall incidence of headache during the 7-day period was 5 patients (3.7%) in the control group and 11 patients (8.2%) in the study group, which is not statistically significant (X<sup>2</sup> = 2.393 and <em>p</em> = 0.122. The severity of headache also shows no statistical significance (2.2% in cases versus 6% in controls; z = 1.53, <em>p</em> = 0.126). The intensity of headache reported at the 24 hours (z = 0.698; <em>p</em> = 0.485), 72 hours (z = 0.849; <em>p</em> = 0.396), and 7 days (z = 0.008; <em>p</em> = 0.994) was not different. There also was no difference in the incidence of backache in the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In contrast to other studies that showed the efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention and treatment of PDPH, our study did not show any significant effect of prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone in prevention of PDPH. However regarding the low number of PDPH in routine cases, evaluation of this intervention in groups with a high incidence of PDPH by using of particulate steroids is recommended to confirm these preliminary findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87042,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","volume":"52 3","pages":"Pages 95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aat.2014.07.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is epidural dexamethasone effective in preventing postdural puncture headache?\",\"authors\":\"Atabak Najafi,&nbsp;Sara Emami,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Khajavi,&nbsp;Farhad Etezadi,&nbsp;Farsad Imani,&nbsp;Mahbod Lajevardi,&nbsp;Pejman Pourfakhr,&nbsp;Reza Shariat Moharari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aat.2014.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the common complications of spinal anesthesia; it is observed in 1–40% of cases involving spinal anesthesia. It can cause considerable morbidity and 40% of cases may require invasive treatments such as epidural blood patch. With the exception of invasive treatments such as an epidural blood patch, current standard treatment modalities have not proved efficacious. There had been some research done that indicated successful prophylaxis and/or treatment of PDPH by administration of intravenous steroids. Based on those findings, we hypothesize that a direct injection of corticosteroids to the anesthesia puncture site could increase the amount of corticosteroid that accumulates in the puncture site, and will be more effective in decreasing dural inflammation and incidence of PDPH than that of parenteral steroids. We formulated our study to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone directly injected into spinal anesthesia puncture sites.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 268 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups; one group received a prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone (2 mL, 8 mg) and the other group received 2 mL of normal saline. The incidence and intensity of PDPH and puncture site backache were each measured at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after spinal anesthesia. The intensity of the headache was graded according to the meningeal headache index.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall incidence of headache during the 7-day period was 5 patients (3.7%) in the control group and 11 patients (8.2%) in the study group, which is not statistically significant (X<sup>2</sup> = 2.393 and <em>p</em> = 0.122. The severity of headache also shows no statistical significance (2.2% in cases versus 6% in controls; z = 1.53, <em>p</em> = 0.126). The intensity of headache reported at the 24 hours (z = 0.698; <em>p</em> = 0.485), 72 hours (z = 0.849; <em>p</em> = 0.396), and 7 days (z = 0.008; <em>p</em> = 0.994) was not different. There also was no difference in the incidence of backache in the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In contrast to other studies that showed the efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention and treatment of PDPH, our study did not show any significant effect of prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone in prevention of PDPH. However regarding the low number of PDPH in routine cases, evaluation of this intervention in groups with a high incidence of PDPH by using of particulate steroids is recommended to confirm these preliminary findings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 95-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aat.2014.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187545971400085X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187545971400085X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:硬脊膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是脊髓麻醉的常见并发症之一;在1-40%的脊髓麻醉病例中观察到。它可引起相当大的发病率,40%的病例可能需要侵入性治疗,如硬膜外血贴。除了侵入性治疗,如硬膜外血液贴片,目前的标准治疗方式尚未证明有效。已经有一些研究表明静脉注射类固醇可以成功预防和/或治疗PDPH。基于这些发现,我们假设在麻醉穿刺部位直接注射皮质类固醇可以增加皮质类固醇在穿刺部位的蓄积量,并且在减少硬脑膜炎症和PDPH发生率方面比非肠外类固醇更有效。我们制定了我们的研究来评估地塞米松直接注射到脊髓麻醉穿刺部位的效果。方法268例脊髓麻醉患者随机分为两组;一组给予地塞米松硬膜外预防性注射(2 mL, 8 mg),另一组给予生理盐水2 mL。分别于脊髓麻醉后24小时、72小时和7天测量PDPH和穿刺部位背痛的发生率和强度。根据脑膜头痛指数对头痛程度进行分级。结果对照组患者7 d头痛总发生率为5例(3.7%),研究组患者11例(8.2%),差异无统计学意义(X2 = 2.393, p = 0.122)。头痛的严重程度也无统计学意义(病例为2.2%,对照组为6%;Z = 1.53, p = 0.126)。24小时报告的头痛强度(z = 0.698;P = 0.485), 72小时(z = 0.849;P = 0.396), 7天(z = 0.008;P = 0.994)差异无统计学意义。两组患者腰痛发生率也无差异。结论与其他研究显示静脉注射地塞米松对PDPH的预防和治疗效果不同,本研究未发现预防性硬膜外注射地塞米松对PDPH的预防效果显著。然而,考虑到常规病例中PDPH发生率较低,建议在PDPH发生率高的人群中通过使用颗粒类固醇来评估这种干预措施,以证实这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is epidural dexamethasone effective in preventing postdural puncture headache?

Background

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the common complications of spinal anesthesia; it is observed in 1–40% of cases involving spinal anesthesia. It can cause considerable morbidity and 40% of cases may require invasive treatments such as epidural blood patch. With the exception of invasive treatments such as an epidural blood patch, current standard treatment modalities have not proved efficacious. There had been some research done that indicated successful prophylaxis and/or treatment of PDPH by administration of intravenous steroids. Based on those findings, we hypothesize that a direct injection of corticosteroids to the anesthesia puncture site could increase the amount of corticosteroid that accumulates in the puncture site, and will be more effective in decreasing dural inflammation and incidence of PDPH than that of parenteral steroids. We formulated our study to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone directly injected into spinal anesthesia puncture sites.

Methods

A total of 268 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups; one group received a prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone (2 mL, 8 mg) and the other group received 2 mL of normal saline. The incidence and intensity of PDPH and puncture site backache were each measured at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after spinal anesthesia. The intensity of the headache was graded according to the meningeal headache index.

Results

The overall incidence of headache during the 7-day period was 5 patients (3.7%) in the control group and 11 patients (8.2%) in the study group, which is not statistically significant (X2 = 2.393 and p = 0.122. The severity of headache also shows no statistical significance (2.2% in cases versus 6% in controls; z = 1.53, p = 0.126). The intensity of headache reported at the 24 hours (z = 0.698; p = 0.485), 72 hours (z = 0.849; p = 0.396), and 7 days (z = 0.008; p = 0.994) was not different. There also was no difference in the incidence of backache in the two groups.

Conclusion

In contrast to other studies that showed the efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention and treatment of PDPH, our study did not show any significant effect of prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone in prevention of PDPH. However regarding the low number of PDPH in routine cases, evaluation of this intervention in groups with a high incidence of PDPH by using of particulate steroids is recommended to confirm these preliminary findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of perioperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on complications after gastrointestinal surgery: A meta-analysis Quadratus lumborum block intramuscular approach for pediatric surgery Reply to: Respiratory acidosis in obese gynecologic patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery independently of the type of ventilation Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting following gynecological laparoscopy: A comparison of standard anesthetic technique and propofol infusion Severe acute peripheral edema induced by noninvasive blood pressure cuff in an elderly patient with hypoalbuminemia under general anesthesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1