治疗试验和长期跟踪评估。

Jack R Cornelius, Ihsan M Salloum, Robert Ferrell, Antoine B Douaihy, Jeanie Hayes, Levent Kirisci, Michelle Horner, Dennis C Daley
{"title":"治疗试验和长期跟踪评估。","authors":"Jack R Cornelius, Ihsan M Salloum, Robert Ferrell, Antoine B Douaihy, Jeanie Hayes, Levent Kirisci, Michelle Horner, Dennis C Daley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the acute phase (12-week) and the long-term (1 year) efficacy of fluoxetine versus placebo for the treatment of the depressive symptoms and the cannabis use of youth with comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD) and an cannabis use disorder (CUD)(cannabis dependence or cannabis abuse). We hypothesized that fluoxetine would demonstrate efficacy in the acute phase trial and at the 1-year follow-up evaluation. Data is also provided regarding the prevalence of risky sexual behaviors in our study sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recently completed the first double-blind placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in adolescents and young adults with comorbid MDD/CUD. A total of 70 persons participated in the acute phase trial, and 68 of those persons (97%) also participated in the 1-year follow-up evaluation. Results of the acute phase study have already been presented (Cornelius, Bukstein, et al., 2010), but the results of the 1 year follow-up assessment have not been published previously. All participants in both treatment groups also received manual-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivation enhancement therapy (MET) during the 12-week course of the study. The 1-year follow-up evaluation was conducted to assess whether the clinical improvements noted during the acute phase trial persisted long term.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the acute phase trial, subjects in both the fluoxetine group and the placebo group showed significant within-group improvement in depressive symptoms and in cannabis-related symptoms. However, no significant difference was noted between the floxetine group and the placebo group on any treatment outcome variable during the acute phase trial. End of study levels of depressive symptoms were low in both the fluoxetine group and the placebo group. Most of the clinical improvements in depressive symptoms and for cannabis-related symptoms persisted at the 1-year follow-up evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fluoxetine did not demonstrate greater efficacy than placebo for treating either the depressive symptoms or the cannabis-related symptoms of our study sample during the acute phase study or at the 1-year follow-up assessment. The lack of a significant treatment effect for fluoxetine may at least in part reflect efficacy of the CBT/MET psychotherapy. A persistence of the efficacy of the acute phase treatment was noted at the 1-year follow-up evaluation, suggesting long-term effectiveness for the CBT/MET psychotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":90547,"journal":{"name":"International journal of medical and biological frontiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4200540/pdf/nihms513297.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TREATMENT TRIAL AND LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP EVALUATION AMONG COMORBID YOUTH WITH MAJOR DEPRESSION AND A CANNABIS USE DISORDER.\",\"authors\":\"Jack R Cornelius, Ihsan M Salloum, Robert Ferrell, Antoine B Douaihy, Jeanie Hayes, Levent Kirisci, Michelle Horner, Dennis C Daley\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the acute phase (12-week) and the long-term (1 year) efficacy of fluoxetine versus placebo for the treatment of the depressive symptoms and the cannabis use of youth with comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD) and an cannabis use disorder (CUD)(cannabis dependence or cannabis abuse). We hypothesized that fluoxetine would demonstrate efficacy in the acute phase trial and at the 1-year follow-up evaluation. Data is also provided regarding the prevalence of risky sexual behaviors in our study sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recently completed the first double-blind placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in adolescents and young adults with comorbid MDD/CUD. A total of 70 persons participated in the acute phase trial, and 68 of those persons (97%) also participated in the 1-year follow-up evaluation. Results of the acute phase study have already been presented (Cornelius, Bukstein, et al., 2010), but the results of the 1 year follow-up assessment have not been published previously. All participants in both treatment groups also received manual-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivation enhancement therapy (MET) during the 12-week course of the study. The 1-year follow-up evaluation was conducted to assess whether the clinical improvements noted during the acute phase trial persisted long term.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the acute phase trial, subjects in both the fluoxetine group and the placebo group showed significant within-group improvement in depressive symptoms and in cannabis-related symptoms. However, no significant difference was noted between the floxetine group and the placebo group on any treatment outcome variable during the acute phase trial. End of study levels of depressive symptoms were low in both the fluoxetine group and the placebo group. Most of the clinical improvements in depressive symptoms and for cannabis-related symptoms persisted at the 1-year follow-up evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fluoxetine did not demonstrate greater efficacy than placebo for treating either the depressive symptoms or the cannabis-related symptoms of our study sample during the acute phase study or at the 1-year follow-up assessment. The lack of a significant treatment effect for fluoxetine may at least in part reflect efficacy of the CBT/MET psychotherapy. A persistence of the efficacy of the acute phase treatment was noted at the 1-year follow-up evaluation, suggesting long-term effectiveness for the CBT/MET psychotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of medical and biological frontiers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4200540/pdf/nihms513297.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of medical and biological frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of medical and biological frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究比较了氟西汀与安慰剂治疗合并重度抑郁障碍(MDD)和大麻使用障碍(CUD)(大麻依赖或大麻滥用)的青少年抑郁症状和大麻使用的急性期(12 周)和长期(1 年)疗效。我们假设氟西汀将在急性期试验和 1 年随访评估中显示出疗效。我们还提供了有关研究样本中危险性行为发生率的数据:最近,我们完成了第一项氟西汀双盲安慰剂对照研究,研究对象为合并 MDD/CUD 的青少年。共有 70 人参加了急性期试验,其中 68 人(97%)还参加了为期 1 年的随访评估。急性期研究的结果已经公布(Cornelius, Bukstein, et al.在为期 12 周的研究过程中,两个治疗组的所有参与者都接受了人工认知行为疗法(CBT)和动机增强疗法(MET)。为期 1 年的随访评估旨在评估急性期试验中发现的临床改善是否会长期存在:结果:在急性期试验中,氟西汀组和安慰剂组的受试者在抑郁症状和大麻相关症状方面均有显著的组内改善。不过,在急性期试验中,氟西汀组和安慰剂组在任何治疗结果变量上都没有明显差异。研究结束时,氟西汀组和安慰剂组的抑郁症状水平都很低。在为期一年的随访评估中,大部分抑郁症状和大麻相关症状的临床改善仍在持续:在急性期研究和为期一年的随访评估中,氟西汀对治疗研究样本的抑郁症状或大麻相关症状的疗效均未超过安慰剂。氟西汀的治疗效果不明显至少部分反映了 CBT/MET 心理疗法的疗效。在为期 1 年的随访评估中,急性期治疗的疗效得以持续,这表明 CBT/MET 心理疗法具有长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TREATMENT TRIAL AND LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP EVALUATION AMONG COMORBID YOUTH WITH MAJOR DEPRESSION AND A CANNABIS USE DISORDER.

Objective: This study compared the acute phase (12-week) and the long-term (1 year) efficacy of fluoxetine versus placebo for the treatment of the depressive symptoms and the cannabis use of youth with comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD) and an cannabis use disorder (CUD)(cannabis dependence or cannabis abuse). We hypothesized that fluoxetine would demonstrate efficacy in the acute phase trial and at the 1-year follow-up evaluation. Data is also provided regarding the prevalence of risky sexual behaviors in our study sample.

Methods: We recently completed the first double-blind placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in adolescents and young adults with comorbid MDD/CUD. A total of 70 persons participated in the acute phase trial, and 68 of those persons (97%) also participated in the 1-year follow-up evaluation. Results of the acute phase study have already been presented (Cornelius, Bukstein, et al., 2010), but the results of the 1 year follow-up assessment have not been published previously. All participants in both treatment groups also received manual-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivation enhancement therapy (MET) during the 12-week course of the study. The 1-year follow-up evaluation was conducted to assess whether the clinical improvements noted during the acute phase trial persisted long term.

Results: During the acute phase trial, subjects in both the fluoxetine group and the placebo group showed significant within-group improvement in depressive symptoms and in cannabis-related symptoms. However, no significant difference was noted between the floxetine group and the placebo group on any treatment outcome variable during the acute phase trial. End of study levels of depressive symptoms were low in both the fluoxetine group and the placebo group. Most of the clinical improvements in depressive symptoms and for cannabis-related symptoms persisted at the 1-year follow-up evaluation.

Conclusions: Fluoxetine did not demonstrate greater efficacy than placebo for treating either the depressive symptoms or the cannabis-related symptoms of our study sample during the acute phase study or at the 1-year follow-up assessment. The lack of a significant treatment effect for fluoxetine may at least in part reflect efficacy of the CBT/MET psychotherapy. A persistence of the efficacy of the acute phase treatment was noted at the 1-year follow-up evaluation, suggesting long-term effectiveness for the CBT/MET psychotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anterior-Posterior Connectivity within the Default Mode Network Increases During Maturation. The "S" Allele of the Serotonin Transporter Is Not Associated with Major Depression or Alcohol Use Disorders in a Veteran Sample. LONGER-TERM EFFECTIVENESS OF CBT IN TREATMENT OF COMORBID AUD/MDD ADOLESCENTS. Interleukin-17 Induces Expression of Chemokines and Cytokines in Prostatic Epithelial Cells but Does Not Stimulate Cell Growth In Vitro. Cannabis Use Disorders Predispose to the Development of Sexually Transmitted Diseases among Youth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1