接受直肠脱垂酶手术的妇女盆底症状和生活质量分析

World journal of colorectal surgery Pub Date : 2013-12-01
Dr Ellington, M Mann, Cb Bowling, Er Drelichman, Wj Greer, Jm Szychowski, He Richter
{"title":"接受直肠脱垂酶手术的妇女盆底症状和生活质量分析","authors":"Dr Ellington,&nbsp;M Mann,&nbsp;Cb Bowling,&nbsp;Er Drelichman,&nbsp;Wj Greer,&nbsp;Jm Szychowski,&nbsp;He Richter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Characterize pelvic floor symptom distress and impact, sexual function and quality of life in women who underwent rectal prolapse surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects undergoing rectal prolapse surgery from 2004-2009 completed questionnaires including the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. Baseline demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics were extracted by chart review. Demographic and clinic outcomes of women undergoing transperineal and abdominal approaches were compared. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45 were identified; two deceased at follow-up. 28/43 subjects (65.1%) responded to the questionnaires. Mean time from original procedure was 3.9 ± 3.1 years. No differences in median total Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and subscale scores, and Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire scores in women undergoing open rectopexy versus transperineal proctectomy were seen (all p>0.05). 26 (60%) participants answered the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, nine reported sexual activity within the last month. All underwent abdominal procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are few colorectal or other pelvic floor symptoms after rectal prolapse repair. Robust prospective studies are needed to more fully characterize and understand issues associated with rectal prolapse surgery in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":90396,"journal":{"name":"World journal of colorectal surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219513/pdf/nihms567599.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PELVIC FLOOR SYMPTOMS AND QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSES IN WOMEN UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR RECTAL PROLPASE.\",\"authors\":\"Dr Ellington,&nbsp;M Mann,&nbsp;Cb Bowling,&nbsp;Er Drelichman,&nbsp;Wj Greer,&nbsp;Jm Szychowski,&nbsp;He Richter\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Characterize pelvic floor symptom distress and impact, sexual function and quality of life in women who underwent rectal prolapse surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects undergoing rectal prolapse surgery from 2004-2009 completed questionnaires including the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. Baseline demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics were extracted by chart review. Demographic and clinic outcomes of women undergoing transperineal and abdominal approaches were compared. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45 were identified; two deceased at follow-up. 28/43 subjects (65.1%) responded to the questionnaires. Mean time from original procedure was 3.9 ± 3.1 years. No differences in median total Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and subscale scores, and Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire scores in women undergoing open rectopexy versus transperineal proctectomy were seen (all p>0.05). 26 (60%) participants answered the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, nine reported sexual activity within the last month. All underwent abdominal procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are few colorectal or other pelvic floor symptoms after rectal prolapse repair. Robust prospective studies are needed to more fully characterize and understand issues associated with rectal prolapse surgery in women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of colorectal surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219513/pdf/nihms567599.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of colorectal surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of colorectal surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨接受直肠脱垂手术的妇女盆底症状、困扰和影响、性功能和生活质量。方法:2004-2009年接受直肠脱垂手术的患者填写盆底困扰问卷、盆底冲击问卷和脱垂/尿失禁性问卷。通过图表回顾提取基线人口统计学、医学和外科特征。比较经会阴入路和腹部入路妇女的人口学和临床结果。连续变量采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,分类测量采用Fisher精确检验。结果:共鉴定出45例;随访时2例死亡。43名受试者中有28人(65.1%)回复了问卷。术后平均时间为3.9±3.1年。盆底窘迫量表、盆底冲击问卷和亚量表评分中位数以及脱垂/尿失禁性问卷评分在开腹直肠切除术和经会阴直肠直肠切除术妇女中均无差异(均p>0.05)。26名(60%)参与者回答了脱垂/尿失禁性问卷,9名报告了上个月的性行为。所有患者均接受了腹部手术。结论:直肠脱垂修复术后很少出现结直肠或其他盆底症状。需要强有力的前瞻性研究来更充分地描述和理解与女性直肠脱垂手术相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PELVIC FLOOR SYMPTOMS AND QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSES IN WOMEN UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR RECTAL PROLPASE.

Objective: Characterize pelvic floor symptom distress and impact, sexual function and quality of life in women who underwent rectal prolapse surgery.

Methods: Subjects undergoing rectal prolapse surgery from 2004-2009 completed questionnaires including the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. Baseline demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics were extracted by chart review. Demographic and clinic outcomes of women undergoing transperineal and abdominal approaches were compared. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical measures.

Results: 45 were identified; two deceased at follow-up. 28/43 subjects (65.1%) responded to the questionnaires. Mean time from original procedure was 3.9 ± 3.1 years. No differences in median total Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and subscale scores, and Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire scores in women undergoing open rectopexy versus transperineal proctectomy were seen (all p>0.05). 26 (60%) participants answered the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, nine reported sexual activity within the last month. All underwent abdominal procedures.

Conclusion: There are few colorectal or other pelvic floor symptoms after rectal prolapse repair. Robust prospective studies are needed to more fully characterize and understand issues associated with rectal prolapse surgery in women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy and the effect of endoscopist experience on polyp detection rates at a tertiary referral center A case of acute intestinal obstruction in an infant during the COVID-19 pandemic Anal pruritus: Diagnosis and management Charity colonoscopy event and fund in Singapore: A Novel Method to Raise Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Screening The structural relationships between quality of life and mental conditions in stoma patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1