计划剖腹产中脊柱麻醉引起的低血压的预防:HEA 130/ 0.4与等渗盐水填充

L. Bennasr, S. Ben Marzouk, Z. Ajili, A. Riahi, M.A. Jarraya, S. Massoudi, H. Jabri, H. Maghrebi
{"title":"计划剖腹产中脊柱麻醉引起的低血压的预防:HEA 130/ 0.4与等渗盐水填充","authors":"L. Bennasr,&nbsp;S. Ben Marzouk,&nbsp;Z. Ajili,&nbsp;A. Riahi,&nbsp;M.A. Jarraya,&nbsp;S. Massoudi,&nbsp;H. Jabri,&nbsp;H. Maghrebi","doi":"10.1016/j.annfar.2014.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of HES 130/0.4 coloading compared to normal saline solution for prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Prospective, randomized.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>One hundred and twenty ASA I and II patients scheduled for elective caesarean section were recruited. Patients were randomized to receive either 500<!--> <!-->mL of HES 130/0.4 (Voluven<sup>®</sup>) coloading (Group<!--> <!-->V) or 500<!--> <!-->mL of normal saline solution coloading (Group<!--> <!-->C). Spinal anesthesia technique and ephedrine administration were standardized in both groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Hypotension occurred in 43 patients in group C and 24 patients in group V (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). Ephedrine consumption was significantly lower in group V (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005). Nausea, vomiting and headache incidence was higher in group C (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006). Apgar scores and umbilical blood gazes were comparable between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>HES 130/0.4 coload was more effective than normal saline solution to prevent hypotension following spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. HES 130/0.4 coload reduced the incidence, the duration of longest hypotension, the need for ephedrine and the adverse maternal effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7913,"journal":{"name":"Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation","volume":"33 12","pages":"Pages 643-647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annfar.2014.10.004","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prévention de l’hypotension induite par la rachianesthésie au cours de la césarienne programmée : coremplissage par HEA 130/0,4 vs sérum salé isotonique\",\"authors\":\"L. Bennasr,&nbsp;S. Ben Marzouk,&nbsp;Z. Ajili,&nbsp;A. Riahi,&nbsp;M.A. Jarraya,&nbsp;S. Massoudi,&nbsp;H. Jabri,&nbsp;H. Maghrebi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annfar.2014.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of HES 130/0.4 coloading compared to normal saline solution for prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Prospective, randomized.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>One hundred and twenty ASA I and II patients scheduled for elective caesarean section were recruited. Patients were randomized to receive either 500<!--> <!-->mL of HES 130/0.4 (Voluven<sup>®</sup>) coloading (Group<!--> <!-->V) or 500<!--> <!-->mL of normal saline solution coloading (Group<!--> <!-->C). Spinal anesthesia technique and ephedrine administration were standardized in both groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Hypotension occurred in 43 patients in group C and 24 patients in group V (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). Ephedrine consumption was significantly lower in group V (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005). Nausea, vomiting and headache incidence was higher in group C (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006). Apgar scores and umbilical blood gazes were comparable between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>HES 130/0.4 coload was more effective than normal saline solution to prevent hypotension following spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. HES 130/0.4 coload reduced the incidence, the duration of longest hypotension, the need for ephedrine and the adverse maternal effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation\",\"volume\":\"33 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 643-647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annfar.2014.10.004\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0750765814011629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0750765814011629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的比较HES 130/0.4与生理盐水在预防择期剖宫产术中腰麻低血压的效果。研究设计前瞻性、随机化。患者和方法纳入120例ASA I和II期择期剖宫产患者。患者随机接受500ml HES 130/0.4 (Voluven®)灌胃(V组)或500ml生理盐水灌胃(C组)。两组均采用标准化的脊髓麻醉技术和麻黄碱给药。主要终点是选择性剖宫产脊柱麻醉期间产妇低血压的发生率。结果C组43例出现血压升高,V组24例出现血压升高(p = 0.001)。V组麻黄碱用量显著降低(P = 0.005)。C组恶心、呕吐、头痛发生率较高(p = 0.006)。阿普加评分和脐血凝视在两组之间具有可比性。结论hes 130/0.4负荷对预防剖宫产择期腰麻术后低血压的效果优于生理盐水。HES 130/0.4负荷降低了发生率、最长低血压持续时间、麻黄素需要量和产妇不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prévention de l’hypotension induite par la rachianesthésie au cours de la césarienne programmée : coremplissage par HEA 130/0,4 vs sérum salé isotonique

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of HES 130/0.4 coloading compared to normal saline solution for prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section.

Study design

Prospective, randomized.

Patients and methods

One hundred and twenty ASA I and II patients scheduled for elective caesarean section were recruited. Patients were randomized to receive either 500 mL of HES 130/0.4 (Voluven®) coloading (Group V) or 500 mL of normal saline solution coloading (Group C). Spinal anesthesia technique and ephedrine administration were standardized in both groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section.

Results

Hypotension occurred in 43 patients in group C and 24 patients in group V (p = 0.001). Ephedrine consumption was significantly lower in group V (P = 0.005). Nausea, vomiting and headache incidence was higher in group C (p = 0.006). Apgar scores and umbilical blood gazes were comparable between groups.

Conclusion

HES 130/0.4 coload was more effective than normal saline solution to prevent hypotension following spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. HES 130/0.4 coload reduced the incidence, the duration of longest hypotension, the need for ephedrine and the adverse maternal effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Atrial natriuretic factor]. [Amniotic fluid embolism]. [Axillary block]. [Infraclavicular block]. Editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1