(99m)Tc-DTPA尿清除率法评估糖尿病肾病肾小球滤过率可能优于血浆消失法。

Nephron Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-01-08 DOI:10.1159/000368901
Shih-Han S Huang, Misha Eliasziw, J David Spence, Guido Filler, William C Vezina, David N Churchill, Daniel C Cattran, Bonnie Richardson, Andrew A House
{"title":"(99m)Tc-DTPA尿清除率法评估糖尿病肾病肾小球滤过率可能优于血浆消失法。","authors":"Shih-Han S Huang,&nbsp;Misha Eliasziw,&nbsp;J David Spence,&nbsp;Guido Filler,&nbsp;William C Vezina,&nbsp;David N Churchill,&nbsp;Daniel C Cattran,&nbsp;Bonnie Richardson,&nbsp;Andrew A House","doi":"10.1159/000368901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Isotopic glomerular filtration rate (iGFR) measurement is comparable to the inulin method. In this study, we compared urinary and plasma iGFR methodologies in patients with diabetic nephropathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 147 patients from 3 sites in the Diabetic Intervention with Vitamins to Improve Nephropathy (DIVINe) trial provided 213 sets of urine and blood collections, at baseline, 18 and 36 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (with standard deviation) plasma iGFR of 60.7 (24.9) ml/min/1.73 m(2) compared to urinary iGFR of 52.0 (28.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2) was statistically significant (p value <0.001). Although plasma and urinary iGFRs were highly related (R(2) = 0.86), plasma iGFR increasingly overestimated urinary iGFRs at lower GFRs. In contrast to the cross-sectional analyses, the two measures of iGFR were weakly related (R(2) = 0.32) in regard to patients' change over 18 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plasma iGFR may not be a suitable method for accurately measuring GFR in patients with advancing degrees of chronic kidney disease from diabetic nephropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"128 3-4","pages":"367-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000368901","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The (99m)Tc-DTPA urinary clearance method may be preferable to the plasma disappearance method for assessing glomerular filtration rate in diabetic nephropathy.\",\"authors\":\"Shih-Han S Huang,&nbsp;Misha Eliasziw,&nbsp;J David Spence,&nbsp;Guido Filler,&nbsp;William C Vezina,&nbsp;David N Churchill,&nbsp;Daniel C Cattran,&nbsp;Bonnie Richardson,&nbsp;Andrew A House\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000368901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Isotopic glomerular filtration rate (iGFR) measurement is comparable to the inulin method. In this study, we compared urinary and plasma iGFR methodologies in patients with diabetic nephropathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 147 patients from 3 sites in the Diabetic Intervention with Vitamins to Improve Nephropathy (DIVINe) trial provided 213 sets of urine and blood collections, at baseline, 18 and 36 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (with standard deviation) plasma iGFR of 60.7 (24.9) ml/min/1.73 m(2) compared to urinary iGFR of 52.0 (28.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2) was statistically significant (p value <0.001). Although plasma and urinary iGFRs were highly related (R(2) = 0.86), plasma iGFR increasingly overestimated urinary iGFRs at lower GFRs. In contrast to the cross-sectional analyses, the two measures of iGFR were weakly related (R(2) = 0.32) in regard to patients' change over 18 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plasma iGFR may not be a suitable method for accurately measuring GFR in patients with advancing degrees of chronic kidney disease from diabetic nephropathy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephron Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"128 3-4\",\"pages\":\"367-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000368901\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephron Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000368901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000368901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:同位素肾小球滤过率(iGFR)测量与菊粉法相当。在这项研究中,我们比较了糖尿病肾病患者尿液和血浆iGFR方法。方法:在糖尿病维生素干预改善肾病(DIVINe)试验中,来自3个地点的147例患者在基线、18和36个月时收集了213组尿液和血液。结果:血浆iGFR均值(标准差)为60.7 (24.9)ml/min/1.73 m(2),尿iGFR均值为52.0 (28.0)ml/min/1.73 m(2),差异有统计学意义(p值)。结论:血浆iGFR可能不是糖尿病肾病合并慢性肾脏病进展患者准确测定GFR的合适方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The (99m)Tc-DTPA urinary clearance method may be preferable to the plasma disappearance method for assessing glomerular filtration rate in diabetic nephropathy.

Background: Isotopic glomerular filtration rate (iGFR) measurement is comparable to the inulin method. In this study, we compared urinary and plasma iGFR methodologies in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Methods: A total of 147 patients from 3 sites in the Diabetic Intervention with Vitamins to Improve Nephropathy (DIVINe) trial provided 213 sets of urine and blood collections, at baseline, 18 and 36 months.

Results: The mean (with standard deviation) plasma iGFR of 60.7 (24.9) ml/min/1.73 m(2) compared to urinary iGFR of 52.0 (28.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2) was statistically significant (p value <0.001). Although plasma and urinary iGFRs were highly related (R(2) = 0.86), plasma iGFR increasingly overestimated urinary iGFRs at lower GFRs. In contrast to the cross-sectional analyses, the two measures of iGFR were weakly related (R(2) = 0.32) in regard to patients' change over 18 months of follow-up.

Conclusion: Plasma iGFR may not be a suitable method for accurately measuring GFR in patients with advancing degrees of chronic kidney disease from diabetic nephropathy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephron Clinical Practice
Nephron Clinical Practice 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Outcomes of In-Centre Haemodialysis Patients between the 1st and 2nd COVID-19 Outbreak in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: A UK Renal Registry Analysis Association of Serum Triglycerides and Renal Outcomes among 1.6 Million US Veterans Genetic Deletion of the Stromal Cell Marker CD248 (Endosialin) Protects against the Development of Renal Fibrosis Contents Vol. 128, 2014 Author Index Vol. 127, No. 1-4, 2014
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1