{"title":"披露经验作为神经外科手术知情同意的风险因素:Johnson v. Kokemoor案例。","authors":"John D Banja","doi":"10.1001/virtualmentor.2015.17.01.oped1-1501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The case of Johnson v Kokemoor illuminates the conflict between patients' right to informed consent and clinicians' need to learn through practice, a conflict that possibly could be resolved through greater transparency about clinicians' experience or experience-dependent medical fees.","PeriodicalId":75209,"journal":{"name":"The virtual mentor : VM","volume":"17 1","pages":"69-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disclosure of experience as a risk factor in informed consent for neurosurgery: the case of Johnson v. Kokemoor.\",\"authors\":\"John D Banja\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/virtualmentor.2015.17.01.oped1-1501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The case of Johnson v Kokemoor illuminates the conflict between patients' right to informed consent and clinicians' need to learn through practice, a conflict that possibly could be resolved through greater transparency about clinicians' experience or experience-dependent medical fees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The virtual mentor : VM\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"69-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The virtual mentor : VM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2015.17.01.oped1-1501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The virtual mentor : VM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2015.17.01.oped1-1501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disclosure of experience as a risk factor in informed consent for neurosurgery: the case of Johnson v. Kokemoor.
The case of Johnson v Kokemoor illuminates the conflict between patients' right to informed consent and clinicians' need to learn through practice, a conflict that possibly could be resolved through greater transparency about clinicians' experience or experience-dependent medical fees.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
